The Matildas and the media.
The MSM has hyped the Australian Women's national football to ridiculous extremes, even raising popular expectation to the level of probable world champions. Of course their object is to make money by treating us to a lot of jingoistic nonsense laid on with a trowel. Of course reality bites when a team of unknowns does a big job on us (Tracey Holmes reported that so little was know about the Nigerian team as to beggar a performance prediction).
I saw the effect of the ridiculous media hype on this site when, on the Game Day thread, MR chided The King for his spoilers on the Ashes and the WC result. MR explained that the disclosed Cricket result was the driver but I suspect that her dashed Matilda expectations was the real cause. The King, as is his clumsy wont, had spoiled the collective fantasy.
I'm not bagging MR, she is no doubt a fine patriotic Australian who wants to see Aussie success and on that score she is pretty typical. Indeed, one felt a tsunami of disappointment surge through the ether at news of the drubbing. After all with Easts now gone to Gowings all we have to cling to is the Swimming. No doubt, however, the MSM will now turn to the "plucky and gallant in defeat" trope that has been stock in trade since Gallipoli.The reality will be straight losses from now on.
My question is why do we keep on heeding the MSM? And why do we obsess about the dross it feeds us while not seeming to give a fig about the predicament of, say, Julian Assange? Surely, his is the real cause for some kind of patriotic media mission.
The MSM has hyped the Australian Women's national football to ridiculous extremes, even raising popular expectation to the level of probable world champions. Of course their object is to make money by treating us to a lot of jingoistic nonsense laid on with a trowel. Of course reality bites when a team of unknowns does a big job on us (Tracey Holmes reported that so little was know about the Nigerian team as to beggar a performance prediction).
I saw the effect of the ridiculous media hype on this site when, on the Game Day thread, MR chided The King for his spoilers on the Ashes and the WC result. MR explained that the disclosed Cricket result was the driver but I suspect that her dashed Matilda expectations was the real cause. The King, as is his clumsy wont, had spoiled the collective fantasy.
I'm not bagging MR, she is no doubt a fine patriotic Australian who wants to see Aussie success and on that score she is pretty typical. Indeed, one felt a tsunami of disappointment surge through the ether at news of the drubbing. After all with Easts now gone to Gowings all we have to cling to is the Swimming. No doubt, however, the MSM will now turn to the "plucky and gallant in defeat" trope that has been stock in trade since Gallipoli.The reality will be straight losses from now on.
My question is why do we keep on heeding the MSM? And why do we obsess about the dross it feeds us while not seeming to give a fig about the predicament of, say, Julian Assange? Surely, his is the real cause for some kind of patriotic media mission.
Comment