The Uluṟu Statement Of The Heart

[Andrew Walker]

I append the full Uluṟu Statement Of The Heart for all to read. It is not a 1 page document as Albanese has said on many occasions, it is a 26 page document. Quite interesting reading Mentions of treaties and even reparations can be found within

https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-...f57ee0da52?amp

[ism22]

It's a single page document.

- Peta Credlin's just trying to confuse things by saying there's a 15 page document... no wait a 26 page document (depends what meeting summaries you wanna attach to the statement itself).

- Peter Dutton is trying to distract people from the fact that the statement directly asks for a voice to parliament.

Typical right-wing FUD trolling. Neeeeeext.

---

Sources (though I know you're not a fan of official/mainstream texts):

https://voice.gov.au/about-voice/uluru-statement

https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au...he_Heart_0.pdf

[Andrew Walker]

It's a single page document.

- Peta Credlin's just trying to confuse things by saying there's a 15 page document... no wait a 26 page document (depends what meeting summaries you wanna attach to the statement itself).

- Peter Dutton is trying to distract people from the fact that the statement directly asks for a voice to parliament.

Typical right-wing FUD trolling. Neeeeeext.

---

Sources (though I know you're not a fan of official/mainstream texts):

https://voice.gov.au/about-voice/uluru-statement

https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au...he_Heart_0.pdf

You dopey lying cnut it’s not one page I’ve read it in it’s entirety

[player 1]

It's a single page document.

- Peta Credlin's just trying to confuse things by saying there's a 15 page document... no wait a 26 page document (depends what meeting summaries you wanna attach to the statement itself).

- Peter Dutton is trying to distract people from the fact that the statement directly asks for a voice to parliament.

Typical right-wing FUD trolling. Neeeeeext.

---

Sources (though I know you're not a fan of official/mainstream texts):

https://voice.gov.au/about-voice/uluru-statement

https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au...he_Heart_0.pdf

Ok, ok, Issy.

So it's one page. If you and Albo say so now.

But.......all these other pages were written by the same people who wrote the 1st page. Whether you call them "minutes" (what a laugh) or anything else, they clearly show the agenda of the authors of the "1 page" statement.

Or were those pages AW attached (and everyone should read) "invented" as some kind of right wing conspiracy??

To pretend that the dystopia described in the above attached full statement is not high on the agenda of the activists running the yes campaign is disingenuous in the extreme.

I can't believe that 38% of the electorate still intend to vote yes.

[player 1]

Get ready for lots of this.....https://www.skynews.com.au/australia...c68b3ac35042f4

[zac]

I append the full Uluṟu Statement Of The Heart for all to read. It is not a 1 page document as Albanese has said on many occasions, it is a 26 page document. Quite interesting reading Mentions of treaties and even reparations can be found within

https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-...f57ee0da52?amp

like even the sky news website says - to say the statement of the heart is just one page is 'technically correct'. better to say that it is correct, that the uluru statement of the heart is one page and that the statement is supported by ten guiding principles. feel free to criticise the guiding principles but don't say that the actual statement of the heart isn't a one page document

[Paddo Colt 61]

Right on Zac, the statement is one page but the MSM (you know who) has pushed the alarm button and, as usual, dopes like the Player and others see a threat. What beats me is how the ignorant and powerless can possibly imagine themselves threatened by anything at all apart from the Liberal Party. If anything, that powerless group should be getting up its own voice to parliament, Problem is that they're too stupid to know what their interests are. Herewith The Voice, we see them following Tory "advice" once again. Will they never learn?

You're not rich you idiots. Conservative interests do not include you - never have and never will. They use you and they laugh at your gormlessness. Serves yez right, yez deserve everything that's coming to you.

Clearly, the referendum is Murdoch's chance to begin the political offensive against Labor that always occurs at about this point in the electoral cycle and they'll add plenty to it as we go on. QANTAS is a good example. The ALP is in a political bind. Open up to the cut price carriers with the repercussions that will follow for the airlines many thousands of employees or protect QANTAS from that. The Libs would never have allowed Qatar to compete. News will milk this one, pushing the "benefits of competition" mantra that we all know but have never actually seen in action in all of the privatisations that have gone before and then they will move on to the next, and the next, building a media cacophony of beat ups and fake outrage. And the mugs can be relied on to buy it every time, eh Player.

[player 1]

like even the sky news website says - to say the statement of the heart is just one page is 'technically correct'. better to say that it is correct, that the uluru statement of the heart is one page and that the statement is supported by ten guiding principles. feel free to criticise the guiding principles but don't say that the actual statement of the heart isn't a one page document

Feel free to actually read what's behind the"guiding principles", as attached above by Andy. This is the agenda of the yes camp. These pages are obviously attached to it, whether or not you obsess over whether the "official statement" is only 1 page. Quite a few of the indigenous authors of it have gone on the record multiple times saying these additional pages are part of the statement, only to recently deny it or say it was "a poor choice of words". There is nothing in there about improving education, health or employment prospects of indigenous Australians. It is an attempted cash and land grab, and like almost all of the annual 38 billion dollars supposedly already spent trying to improve things for the indigenous, the vast majority of the extra cash will go to the Aboriginal Industry - public servants and contractors who are the ones to profit from all this, and in whose interest it is for conditions for Aborigines in remote communities to never improve.

As for Paddo, I think if Albo told you to eat a turd you'd swallow it whole and say yum.

Also Paddo, you confuse people who actually own anything that they've worked for with "the rich".

[player 1]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/306157055220045

[player 1]

https://twitter.com/FairAusADV/statu...34051bfa1f2110

[Random Rooster]

It is an attempted cash and land grab

Can't have that!

[player 1]

Can't have that!

Ha ha good one.

[zac]

Feel free to actually read what's behind the"guiding principles", as attached above by Andy. This is the agenda of the yes camp. These pages are obviously attached to it, whether or not you obsess over whether the "official statement" is only 1 page. Quite a few of the indigenous authors of it have gone on the record multiple times saying these additional pages are part of the statement, only to recently deny it or say it was "a poor choice of words". There is nothing in there about improving education, health or employment prospects of indigenous Australians. It is an attempted cash and land grab, and like almost all of the annual 38 billion dollars supposedly already spent trying to improve things for the indigenous, the vast majority of the extra cash will go to the Aboriginal Industry - public servants and contractors who are the ones to profit from all this, and in whose interest it is for conditions for Aborigines in remote communities to never improve.

As for Paddo, I think if Albo told you to eat a turd you'd swallow it whole and say yum.

Also Paddo, you confuse people who actually own anything that they've worked for with "the rich".

the main reason this is an issue is because, the argument goes, the yes camp are lying about what's in the uluru statement. they're not.

sure, there's a lot of other stuff and i looked at the guiding principles and glanced through the rest but so what? the voice will have no power other than the power to advise government and the parliament. what the parliament does with that advice is up to the parliament. the more impractical the advice from the voice the less likely parliament will listen to it

[Andrew Walker]

the main reason this is an issue is because, the argument goes, the yes camp are lying about what's in the uluru statement. they're not.

sure, there's a lot of other stuff and i looked at the guiding principles and glanced through the rest but so what? the voice will have no power other than the power to advise government and the parliament. what the parliament does with that advice is up to the parliament. the more impractical the advice from the voice the less likely parliament will listen to it

Unlike yourself who chooses not to thoroughly investigate or arm yourself with the full spectrum of knowledge that is available. I have done so and having done just that I will be voting NO. This my dear commie mate is why the govt did not want these 26 pages to see the light of day

[player 1]

the main reason this is an issue is because, the argument goes, the yes camp are lying about what's in the uluru statement. they're not.

sure, there's a lot of other stuff and i looked at the guiding principles and glanced through the rest but so what? the voice will have no power other than the power to advise government and the parliament. what the parliament does with that advice is up to the parliament. the more impractical the advice from the voice the less likely parliament will listen to it

They are lying about these extra pages being a more detailed description of what kind of "advice" they'll be giving parliament. And who pays for the inevitable high court legal challenges if their "advice" isn't heeded to their satisfaction? Oh yeah, the evil whitey taxpayers.