The Uluṟu Statement Of The Heart

[Jacks Fur Coat]

Supreme Grand Wizard? Paddo? You? Jack? And who are the grand ones minions? Oh the mystery.

If it's me, I'll take Supreme Grand Wizard

Compared to what I've been called on here.

[ism22]

Lol God no! It's all the pep talks I've been getting from Paddo and Andy.

Sounds like this thread's becoming a bootcamp / motivational thread?

CAAAARN... WHO SAID STOP YOU SHEEPLE?!?!?!? GIMME 50 MORE BURPEES!!!!

[Rooster1908]

Sounds like this thread's becoming a bootcamp / motivational thread?

CAAAARN... WHO SAID STOP YOU SHEEPLE?!?!?!? GIMME 50 MORE BURPEES!!!!

Ah a follower calling no voter sheepie.

[mightyrooster]

If it's me, I'll take Supreme Grand Wizard

Compared to what I've been called on here.

True but I think it’s the bit about the Wizard letting his minions off the chain which is a tad disturbing.

[mightyrooster]

Sounds like this thread's becoming a bootcamp / motivational thread?

CAAAARN... WHO SAID STOP YOU SHEEPLE?!?!?!? GIMME 50 MORE BURPEES!!!!

Nah I’ve been lectured about sticking to my beliefs and not backing down so I’ve been trying to put that into practice today lol.

[Rocky Rhodes]

Thanks BB. You voiced your opinion without abusing or labelling the other side.
The point is we all had our reasons for voting how we did. No need to call people dumb or a virtue signaller or woke. Especially dumb that is particularly rude. I happened to put a lot of thought into how I voted. The No vote won. Please be dignified in your victory people. If the best you can come up with is you’re dumb or go suck s*** losers etc, then it’s a very sad situation.

The funny thing about u being offended by name calling (none was directed purely on u) is that u seem to be only offended by the "No" voters. U seem to turn a blind eye towards even the heaviest name callers on ur woke "Yes" Sheeples side. The biggest name callers are Paddo cult, Sally, Random and a few other leftards...

So let's get real, u are only offended because your side lost...ur complete bias proves that.

[Rocky Rhodes]

I started on the internet about 20 years ago, with no idea what forums were about and no idea much how to post in them.
I joined the New York Times opinion forums.
First Amendment free speech, ...and some Americans used every grain of it, to say whatever they liked, including verbally abusing anyone and everyone they wished.
I tried the "Race Relations" forum...yikes!!!
I tried the "Middle East" forum...triple yikes!!!
I tried the "Drugs" forum...and wrote "say no to drugs". Luckily it was only verbal abuse I received. lol

It was there, at the NYT that my skin turned into thick skin like a crocodile.

Some comedy Gold in there..

[mightyrooster]

The funny thing about u being offended by name calling (none was directed purely on u) is that u seem to be only offended by the "No" voters. U seem to turn a blind eye towards even the heaviest name callers on ur woke "Yes" Sheeples side. The biggest name callers are Paddo cult, Sally, Random and a few other leftards...

So let's get real, u are only offended because your side lost...ur complete bias proves that.

You make a fair point Rocky. All I can say is I have never brought out the racist card or the like and yes if there is name calling from the Yes side I agree it is a poor excuse for a proper discussion too.

I’m not a sore loser at all but Ray and a few others are definitely nasty winners. I’m also not a leftard. I’m more of a swinging voter. I’ve voted for both sides over the course of the past 40 years or so. I’ve also voted against both sides and gone independent or Democrat at various times in the past as neither was appealing.

[Rocky Rhodes]

I would have been happy if only First Nations people voted on this, but alas, the Constitution doesn't allow it.

I think your posts sum up the No Vote misinformation campaign perfectly.

It was pretty clear that it was an advisory group and that parliament was not bound in any way, shape, or form, to implement via legislation or government policies any of the Voice recommendations.

And the High Court cannot overturn statute laws made by Parliament or force Parliament to enact any statute laws from any recommendations from any group, including the Voice.

Electorate education levels, household income, birthplace, and age were key factors.

Anyway, there are other ways to get this through before a future second referendum: state and territory governments treaties and voices to parliament.

For instance, the Minns government has a mandate for this from the last state election.

Whether it takes another 5 or 10 or 15 years, it will be enshrined in the constitution.

LOL...U are orange tan man FAKE news Salvotard.

Stick to ur stupid boring baseball because u clearly have ZERO idea about anything political or anything common sense related.

Yeah maybe we should only allow the shooters party to get mandatory ownership of guns in our constitution...lol

The voice was anything but an advisory group, "Voice, Treaty, Truth" is what it was about....and the Truth part being about reparations i.e payments, taxes etc etc.

High Court cannot overturn laws made??? lol...complete BS...that is the purpose of the high court, to judge matters of the law.

Peeps of all educational backgrounds said "No" to the voice...likewise complete banana's like ur self said yes.

Anyway, there are other ways to get this through before a future second referendum: state and territory governments treaties and voices to parliament.

Yeah Nah...perhaps u might wanna Sally Google if States can pass treaties etc....what u so upset u forgot to Google?

State, territory, and local governments have no power under the Commonwealth Constitution to enter into treaties. The High Court of Australia has made clear that the sole power to enter into treaties rests with the Commonwealth government.

So all that Qld treaties by Palachook nonsense was nothing but fake news.

So yeah, head back to dreamland if u think a failed Referendum is gonna come back again.

Name one failed Referendum that returned?

Australia failed to become a republic referendum in 1999? 24 years on and counting

Unfortunately for u, neither of these things will happen in ur lifetime. No Voice, no republic.

[Rocky Rhodes]

You make a fair point Rocky. All I can say is I have never brought out the racist card or the like and yes if there is name calling from the Yes side I agree it is a poor excuse for a proper discussion too.

I’m not a sore loser at all but Ray and a few others are definitely nasty winners. I’m also not a leftard. I’m more of a swinging voter. I’ve voted for both sides over the course of the past 40 years or so. I’ve also voted against both sides and gone independent or Democrat at various times in the past as neither was appealing.

Fair enough, as long as u jump on "Name Calling" from both sides and be fair..

As for the racist card, that was clearly played by the "Yes" campaign early on...look at Paddo Cult or Sally as examples. Anyone not voting 'yes' was racist according to them.
This is what happens when u divide by race...Jacinta Price was right...it was a divisive campaign.

Labour has a left wing and right wing.
Liberals/ nationals have both wings as well.

So changing from either side doesn't clear u of not been "left".
I voted some independent last election too...

Anyways if u not solid "left" then why take offense?

Finally, just out of interest, what swayed u to vote YES?

[Random Rooster]

If it's me, I'll take Supreme Grand Wizard

Compared to what I've been called on here.

Sorry Jack, hate to disappoint you but it's not you- far from it actually

[mightyrooster]

Fair enough, as long as u jump on "Name Calling" from both sides and be fair..

As for the racist card, that was clearly played by the "Yes" campaign early on...look at Paddo Cult or Sally as examples. Anyone not voting 'yes' was racist according to them.
This is what happens when u divide by race...Jacinta Price was right...it was a divisive campaign.

Labour has a left wing and right wing.
Liberals/ nationals have both wings as well.

So changing from either side doesn't clear u of not been "left".
I voted some independent last election too...

Anyways if u not solid "left" then why take offense?

Finally, just out of interest, what swayed u to vote YES?

I voted yes so clearly when Ray says all yes voters are dumb, virtue signallers and he has no respect for any yes voter of course there’s a chance I would find that offensive. I am not dumb and am capable of thinking for myself. It is possible to have a difference of opinion when neither party is dumb. I don’t vote on party lines. Believe it or not some Libs voted Yes so you don’t have to be a lefty to vote yes.

[Rocky Rhodes]

I voted yes so clearly when Ray says all yes voters are dumb, virtue signallers and he has no respect for any yes voter of course there’s a chance I would find that offensive. I am not dumb and am capable of thinking for myself. It is possible to have a difference of opinion when neither party is dumb. I don’t vote on party lines. Believe it or not some Libs voted Yes so you don’t have to be a lefty to vote yes.

U failed to answer the question...what swayed u to vote the way u did...yeah i know which way u voted by why? Just out of interest..

Yes, liberal party have left wing and right wing factions too.

[rented tracksuit]

Anyhoo, what will be their next attempt at change?

[Jacks Fur Coat]

Sorry Jack, hate to disappoint you but it's not you- far from it actually

I'm crushed....will have to change my sig.