Originally posted by Rocky Rhodes
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Uluṟu Statement Of The Heart
Collapse
X
-
- 1 like
-
As noted, what swayed my vote was my discussions with indigenous Australians who are close to me (friends and colleagues).
Further, I used my legal skills to interpret the proposed amendments. This dispelled a lot of the misinformation that was intentionally being disseminated (which I thought was poor form).
Comment
-
Originally posted by mightyrooster View Post
I voted yes so clearly when Ray says all yes voters are dumb, virtue signallers and he has no respect for any yes voter of course there’s a chance I would find that offensive. I am not dumb and am capable of thinking for myself. It is possible to have a difference of opinion when neither party is dumb. I don’t vote on party lines. Believe it or not some Libs voted Yes so you don’t have to be a lefty to vote yes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
No one should be bullying anyone on how they voted .But if you check a certain ACT yes poster he is as bad or worse that most .
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by mightyrooster View PostAs I said to Rocky, my initial reaction was because Ray was being very derogatory to yes voters. The depth of feeling towards us yes voters, fellow Australians in a democracy and I felt the comments were quite nasty and bordered on hatred with words like he has no respect for us at all. I took that personally as I thought it was unnecessary. That was all I was responding to. Of course there have been yes voters on here who have also used personal abusive arguments which I addressed when Rocky raised it with me. I get that.
Who ever thought this was a good idea and wouldn't create division was a fool.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster1908 View Post
Sorry MR in no way having a shot at you . just over the likes of Ism virtue signaling .
Who ever thought this was a good idea and wouldn't create division was a fool.When you trust your television
what you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
they can bend it all they want
John Mayer
Comment
-
Originally posted by mightyrooster View Post
Yep, these threads would be so lame and boring without us Ken Behrens to spice things up.When you trust your television
what you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
they can bend it all they want
John Mayer
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by rented tracksuit View PostWho cares who voted what. NO won. Move on.
That is all.
I think the difference with 'yes' voters is that we invested in something. We wanted change and saw decent benefits in it.
This wasn't a standard political contest of 'Albo versus Dutton' (those I see this is the driving factor for some of the Albo haters in here), it was a question of social conscience.
Yes voters have a right to unpack what just happened without being heckled / aggravated IMO. Doesn't take a genius to realise there's sensitivities at play here. If it were a footy game then it'd be a 'winners and losers' situation but we'd still be entitled to unpack the outcome as to why our 'better team' didn't win on the day (whether it be the refs/bunker, coaching, injuries, luck with 1%'ers, lack of concentration during a clutch moment...etc).
A tone I'm noticing here is that there's a lot of active no campaigners as opposed to just voters (i.e. people who took the effort to spread misinformation online & were walking around with no banners... likely because they belong to a conservative political party that gave them the said banners) are intentionally showing zero empathy /understanding and acting as if it was a contest.
IMO a level of empathy would be appreciated at such times. I'm not throwing daggers at anybody who voted no, but I do have a right to unpack what just happened, which includes resentment for things such as the misinformation that fouled who started out as a bipartisan effort to give Indigenous Australians constitutional recognition. For WHATEVER reason... Dutton changed the Libs' policy position to 'no we don't support the Uluru Statement' and actively campaigned against it (including by spreading misinformation about it) when it began its life as Liberal Party policy (with bipartisan support).
IMO it was a nasty (desperate) political stunt from Dutton aimed at winning points for himself as a leader of the Liberal Party as he's still on VERY shaky ground. I accept that people voted no and have made my peace with that. However, I remain disappointed that Dutton chose the path he did and that more robust discussions were avoided as the result of an elaborate misinformation campaign.
Comment
Comment