If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It’s the way the woke snowflakes of today think Andy. It’s their way or no way and if you disagree, you get the honour of some new fancy term or label to make them feel better about themselves or somehow in control.
And of course woke and snowflakes are not labels. Just putting it out there.
And of course woke and snowflakes are not labels. Just putting it out there.
NO.
Those terms are not pointing at anyone in particular. They describe the actions of a group. Unlike the insults thrown directly at individuals from the other side.
If it was a personal label, it would be justified in response to the attacks from the YES camp.
Those terms are not pointing at anyone in particular. They describe the actions of a group. Unlike the insults thrown directly at individuals from the other side.
If it was a personal label, it would be justified in response to the attacks from the YES camp.
Those terms are not pointing at anyone in particular. They describe the actions of a group. Unlike the insults thrown directly at individuals from the other side.
If it was a personal label, it would be justified in response to the attacks from the YES camp.
Bravo RT Bravo Bravo
When you trust your television
what you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
they can bend it all they want
Nobody is dummy spitting. I can't recall the term that Izzy used but essentially we are now debriefing, picking over the entrails if you will. We can't put such a significant result aside without discussion. We need to consider what makes us tick as a nation. Did Dutton, the Libs and News jettison principle and National integrity for miserable political point scoring? I say that they did. Not that there is anything new in that, the same sort of destructive impulses from the same cabal were at play in the Coup in '75.
wow..................our sites back up, and this thread is still going.
Is it down to the yes voters still spitting the dummy?
No dummy spitting here Eddie.
Just as a general comment (not specifically at you Eddie), imagine if fans were not allowed to discuss a Roosters loss after a game we were expected to win, or lost badly etc. If the no vote had lost would no voters be keeping quiet or would they be blowing up about how the world has gone completely woke / mad / crazy and complaining that they can't upset the precious petals / snowflakes / lightweights? Food for thought. But I know what the response will be. NO!
Just as a general comment (not specifically at you Eddie), imagine if fans were not allowed to discuss a Roosters loss after a game we were expected to win, or lost badly etc. If the no vote had lost would no voters be keeping quiet or would they be blowing up about how the world has gone completely woke / mad / crazy and complaining that they can't upset the precious petals / snowflakes / lightweights? Food for thought. But I know what the response will be. NO!
The difference is MR, YES was never expected to win.
The whole thing was a waste of time and tax payer money.
The difference is MR, YES was never expected to win.
The whole thing was a waste of time and tax payer money.
Lol, nice avoiding of my question there. I think maybe at the start people did expect YES had a good chance to win but it went downhill pretty quickly and by the end it was fairly clear it was never going to win.
Lol, nice avoiding of my question there. I think maybe at the start people did expect YES had a good chance to win but it went downhill pretty quickly and by the end it was fairly clear it was never going to win.
Theres no question to answer MR. NO was soundly beaten. There is no ‘if’. Not when the result wasn’t even close.
Maybe I shouldn't comment because I didn't vote.........................no bugger it. When the dust finally settles, I agree with RT that this whole exercise was nothing more than a huge waste of tax payers money.
One observation is that on the whole, the yes crowd were more rude and obnoxious than the no lot.
Theres no question to answer MR. NO was soundly beaten. There is no ‘if’. Not when the result wasn’t even close.
As I said Renty, I have accepted the result and moved on. My YES vote only happened after a LOT of thinking and tooing and froing anyway. But it was definitely a yes in the end and I wouldn't change my mind if I had the choice again. But I think it's only fair that the losers are allowed to assess and unpack want went wrong. No voters may not care to admit it but I am fairly certain they would be discussing and whining just as much as the Yes voters are now if the results were reversed. And yes it can be said because I am saying it, no ifs or buts about it.
As I said Renty, I have accepted the result and moved on. My YES vote only happened after a LOT of thinking and tooing and froing anyway. But it was definitely a yes in the end and I wouldn't change my mind if I had the choice again. But I think it's only fair that the losers are allowed to assess and unpack want went wrong. No voters may not care to admit it but I am fairly certain they would be discussing and whining just as much as the Yes voters are now if the results were reversed. And yes it can be said because I am saying it, no ifs or buts about it.
I respect your vote MR. I always did. I only got involved here to pull up those acting like they should have everything go their way and spitting their dummies when the voice of reason said they shouldn’t.
My comments here are not about the whys and why nots of the referrndum but the mechanics of how one side played bullying tactics which backfired on them.
Comment