Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The tory bullcr@p thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Carlos Parra View Post
You said my comment was 100% fact free. I asked you to point out the lies/errors, but you failed miserably. You didn't even try.
For someone who tries to give off the appearance of being my 'better', you could at least educate yourself in matters of grammar.
It's not 'whom we're dealing with', it's 'who we're dealing with'.
Alternatively, you could have said 'with whom we are dealing'.
Get an education you imbecile.
When to use "whom" or "who" ? I'll make it simple. If you can replace the word (being either who or whom) with "he" or "she" then that's when you use the word "who"
For instance " ....... always masturbates" You can say "he always masturbates" or "she always masturbates" so you should use " who always masturbates"
Therefore " whom we are dealing with" is correct.....you can't say "he we are dealing with" or "she we are dealing with" , so "who" cannot be used
Many people get it wrong but personally i think if it sounds right then it doesn't matter
*These principles don't apply to AC DC guitarist Angus Young when he wrote the Who Made Who!
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Random Rooster View Post
Welcome to Sunday School with Randy Rooster!
When to use "whom" or "who" ? I'll make it simple. If you can replace the word (being either who or whom) with "he" or "she" then that's when you use the word "who"
For instance " ....... always masturbates" You can say "he always masturbates" or "she always masturbates" so you should use " who always masturbates"
Therefore " whom we are dealing with" is correct.....you can't say "he we are dealing with" or "she we are dealing with" , so "who" cannot be used
Many people get it wrong but personally i think if it sounds right then it doesn't matter
*These principles don't apply to AC DC guitarist Angus Young when he wrote the Who Made Who!
Comment
-
OK, I'll take the lesson but I maintain that it is better to say 'with whom we are dealing' rather than 'whom we are dealing with'.
As you say Random, it really doesn't matter.1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.
Comment
-
Okay but what about the alternative "facts"? Young people people on this site might be attracted to the bullying "debating" style and they should be made aware that Carlo was wrong on all counts. Murdoch plays the same game - divert, obfuscate, confuse - always with the intent of getting just 3%-5% of nongs to change their vote.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61 View PostOkay but what about the alternative "facts"? Young people people on this site might be attracted to the bullying "debating" style and they should be made aware that Carlo was wrong on all counts. Murdoch plays the same game - divert, obfuscate, confuse - always with the intent of getting just 3%-5% of nongs to change their vote.
I told you that your "whom we're dealing with here" sentence was grammatically clunky and that TROVE didn't like it. Earlier I provided you with a better alternative - I did not say it was WRONG.
Technically, what you typed was not incorrect, so happy masturbating Padded Cell 61.
Just consider yourself lucky that I didn't pull you up for ending a sentence with a preposition and an adverb.
Sentence structure, logic and research are clearly not your strong points.1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61 View PostSay what....No evidence for my factual corrections? Google them. And you weren't right about anything.
You're diverting - let the who/whom go ffs. It's irrelevant.
You claimed my entire post was 100% incorrect. I've been man enough to cede ground regarding your poor use of grammar, but you still haven't provided evidence for everything else that's supposed to be factually incorrect.1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.
Comment
-
Give us a break Mr. Tele. You don't think the High Court ordered the release of those detainees? You don't think that the RBA sets interest rates? You don't think that Immigration is bi-partisan? I don't need evidence for all of that - it's fact! Please, somebody wise him up.
And give up the grammar smoke screen as well ffs - you're wrong about that too. Wrong headed about everything really.
Comment
-
The RBA controls monetary policy by determining interest rates, regardless of which political party is in Government. It does this in order to keep inflation within a targeted range of about 2-3% over the economic cycle. This range ensures that the economy remains stable and doesn't overheat or go into recession.
The main reason Australia's inflation rate, and global rate's have been so high over the past 18 months is supply based - shortages in supply due to the Covid Pandemic, Vlad's invasion of Ukraine (see the myriad of other threads for this enthralling discussion), and natural disasters destroying crops etc.
Even if ScoMo was re-elected, the RBA would have still been on a mission to increase interest rates, as inflation is too high and needs to be brought under control. Increasing interest rates takes the heat out of the economy. That's a very simple and basic explanation.
Comment
-
Merci Mighty one but don't think that you are yet in my good books, I'm still intending to take you to task on that "complicated" situation in Gaza. There's not too much that's complicated about raining ordinance on civilians on the pretext of weeding out Hamas. Recently Israel claimed Hamas were hiding in ambulances. Yeah, right.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mightyrooster View PostThe RBA controls monetary policy by determining interest rates, regardless of which political party is in Government. It does this in order to keep inflation within a targeted range of about 2-3% over the economic cycle. This range ensures that the economy remains stable and doesn't overheat or go into recession.
The main reason Australia's inflation rate, and global rate's have been so high over the past 18 months is supply based - shortages in supply due to the Covid Pandemic, Vlad's invasion of Ukraine (see the myriad of other threads for this enthralling discussion), and natural disasters destroying crops etc.
Even if ScoMo was re-elected, the RBA would have still been on a mission to increase interest rates, as inflation is too high and needs to be brought under control. Increasing interest rates takes the heat out of the economy. That's a very simple and basic explanation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mightyrooster View PostThe RBA controls monetary policy by determining interest rates, regardless of which political party is in Government. It does this in order to keep inflation within a targeted range of about 2-3% over the economic cycle. This range ensures that the economy remains stable and doesn't overheat or go into recession.
The main reason Australia's inflation rate, and global rate's have been so high over the past 18 months is supply based - shortages in supply due to the Covid Pandemic, Vlad's invasion of Ukraine (see the myriad of other threads for this enthralling discussion), and natural disasters destroying crops etc.
Even if ScoMo was re-elected, the RBA would have still been on a mission to increase interest rates, as inflation is too high and needs to be brought under control. Increasing interest rates takes the heat out of the economy. That's a very simple and basic explanation.
Comment
Comment