Oh dear.

[Guest]

f i g h t ! ! !

[kurtsherlock6]

Still begging for acceptance I see rocky. It's ok, its not your fault your mum and dad are brother and sister.

Chook.

Thats a very low blow even by your standards

[Guest]

Lol...You are such a predictable Loser Chook. Everytime you get your arse kicked in a debate/argument you bring out the 2 old chestnuts which you have used at least 100 times between them. These are:
1. If you wooping my arse your parents practice incest..
2. If you are wooping my arse you crave acceptance

The first one is a reflection of your sick mind, the second has delicious irony because no one seeks attention and acceptance more than you. I just looked over 5 pages in this section and there are 13 threads seeking attention lol. Poor Chooky wooky, nobody accepts him. Maybe if you were not such a Loser....

Actually your the only one I use the incest reasoning on as I can't for the life of me think of any other syndrome or disorder that would explain how utterly moronic you are.

Incest would also explain why you have never formed your own opinion on any topic on this forum ever! Rather you latch onto other's opinions and posts and reconcile that you agree with them and that then forms your opinion. You've been registered since 2009 and have started less than 5 threads. You are a sheep rocky. You are af follower of others opinions as yours, ie you crave acceptance by leaching of others.

Leach away tard, it's truly funny to watch.

Chook.

[Rocky Rhodes]

Actually your the only one I use the incest reasoning on as I can't for the life of me think of any other syndrome or disorder that would explain how utterly moronic you are.

Incest would also explain why you have never formed your own opinion on any topic on this forum ever! Rather you latch onto other's opinions and posts and reconcile that you agree with them and that then forms your opinion. You've been registered since 2009 and have started less than 5 threads. You are a sheep rocky. You are af follower of others opinions as yours, ie you crave acceptance by leaching of others.

Leach away tard, it's truly funny to watch.

Chook.

hahaha....thanks for proving my point again you completely stupid moron. The fact that you have a complete fixation on Incest speaks more about you that anyone else. And the forums ultimate extreme left wing sheep calling me a sheep hahahaha. Let's face it, you can't think outside of the left / right wing spectrum. The fact that you call anyone stupid who thinks different to you speaks volumes.

Now crawl back into the cellar under your parents house you complete maggot because the sky is falling. From there you can create another thread begging for acceptance you mutant freak.

[Guest]

And slowly the lies are unravelling.
"The Met Office has downgraded its forecast for global warming to suggest that by 2017 temperatures will have remained about the same for two decades."

And here

"In recent years, researchers have considered the possibility that the sun plays a role in global warming. After all, the sun is the main source of heat for our planet....., a dawning realization among researchers that even these apparently tiny variations can have a significant effect on terrestrial climate"

[Guest]

Ditto on the straw clutching attempt tootsie.

The link still refers to a warming planet.

Chook.

[Guest]

Ditto on the straw clutching attempt tootsie.

The link still refers to a warming planet.

Chook.

Have another read Chook. You can stop driving your Prius now.

[stsae]

Have another read Chook. You can stop driving your Prius now.

LOL, Poopsie why are you stirring up the ChookMan???

How you been anyways mate???

[Guest]

Have another read Chook. You can stop driving your Prius now.

From your link Toots - "Raymond Bradley of UMass, who has studied historical records of solar activity imprinted by radioisotopes in tree rings and ice cores, says that regional rainfall seems to be more affected than temperature. "If there is indeed a solar effect on climate, it is manifested by changes in general circulation rather than in a direct temperature signal." This fits in with the conclusion of the IPCC and previous NRC reports that solar variability is NOT the cause of global warming over the last 50 years."

Did you not read that paragraph Toots or just ignore it cause it doesn't fit your viewpoint?

Chook.

[Burnt Rooster]

Some in here obvoiusly have way too much free time on their hands.

[Guest]

From your link Toots - "Raymond Bradley of UMass, who has studied historical records of solar activity imprinted by radioisotopes in tree rings and ice cores, says that regional rainfall seems to be more affected than temperature. "If there is indeed a solar effect on climate, it is manifested by changes in general circulation rather than in a direct temperature signal." This fits in with the conclusion of the IPCC and previous NRC reports that solar variability is NOT the cause of global warming over the last 50 years."

Did you not read that paragraph Toots or just ignore it cause it doesn't fit your viewpoint?

Chook.

My question too hard for you Toots?

Let me guess, you don't believe in man made global warming? That's fine. Many people don't believe in evolution either or gravity or science in general for that matter, but here's what I think has happened. You peruse a deniers website where they clutch at straws like the one you've posted here. That site has sucked you into believing this straw is some revelation and rather than actually read the entire article, you've just copied and pasted the straw clutch of the one paragraph that mentions solar output into here with a "hey look everyone I know what I'm talking about"?

How close am I Toots?

Chook.

[Guest]

My question too hard for you Toots?

Let me guess, you don't believe in man made global warming? That's fine. Many people don't believe in evolution either or gravity or science in general for that matter, but here's what I think has happened. You peruse a deniers website where they clutch at straws like the one you've posted here. That site has sucked you into believing this straw is some revelation and rather than actually read the entire article, you've just copied and pasted the straw clutch of the one paragraph that mentions solar output into here with a "hey look everyone I know what I'm talking about"?

How close am I Toots?

Chook.

Pardon the pun Chook, but you are getting colder
http://members.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/howmuch.htm
http://www.sciencebits.com/IceCoreTruth
"The ‘noncept’ is of course the ‘greenhouse effect.’ This was examined experimentally over 100 years ago by Prof. R. W Wood of Johns Hopkins U and found not to exist and High School Physics shows why: when a molecule radiates energy it cools and when another molecule absorbs that energy, it warms. So the net result is null; there is no increase in temperature."
No warming here
AGW alarmist gets it wrong
"In 2005, Flannery predicted Sydney's dams could be dry in as little as two years because global warming was drying up the rains, leaving the city "facing extreme difficulties with water".

Check Sydney's dam levels today: 73 per cent. Hmm. Not a good start.

In 2008, Flannery said: "The water problem is so severe for Adelaide that it may run out of water by early 2009."

Check Adelaide's water storage levels today: 77 per cent.

In 2007, Flannery predicted cities such as Brisbane would never again have dam-filling rains, as global warming had caused "a 20 per cent decrease in rainfall in some areas" and made the soil too hot, "so even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and river systems ... ".

Check the Murray-Darling system today: in flood. Check Brisbane's dam levels: 100 per cent full."
It's a scam
You didn't comment on this link so I'll post it again just in case you missed it Chook.
If Juliar and her inept government, are so concerned about rising carbon emissions, why then are they happy to increase our exports of coal?
The answer is, just like the fraudulent carbon tax, MONEY!

[Guest]

LOL, Poopsie why are you stirring up the ChookMan???

How you been anyways mate???

I've been well thanks mate. I wasn't stirring up anyone intentionally, just posting some interesting information. Chook certainly is passionate about his views I must say.
How is the home brew going?

[Guest]

Pardon the pun Chook, but you are getting colder
http://members.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/howmuch.htm
http://www.sciencebits.com/IceCoreTruth
"The ‘noncept’ is of course the ‘greenhouse effect.’ This was examined experimentally over 100 years ago by Prof. R. W Wood of Johns Hopkins U and found not to exist and High School Physics shows why: when a molecule radiates energy it cools and when another molecule absorbs that energy, it warms. So the net result is null; there is no increase in temperature."
No warming here
AGW alarmist gets it wrong
"In 2005, Flannery predicted Sydney's dams could be dry in as little as two years because global warming was drying up the rains, leaving the city "facing extreme difficulties with water".

Check Sydney's dam levels today: 73 per cent. Hmm. Not a good start.

In 2008, Flannery said: "The water problem is so severe for Adelaide that it may run out of water by early 2009."

Check Adelaide's water storage levels today: 77 per cent.

In 2007, Flannery predicted cities such as Brisbane would never again have dam-filling rains, as global warming had caused "a 20 per cent decrease in rainfall in some areas" and made the soil too hot, "so even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and river systems ... ".

Check the Murray-Darling system today: in flood. Check Brisbane's dam levels: 100 per cent full."
It's a scam
You didn't comment on this link so I'll post it again just in case you missed it Chook.
If Juliar and her inept government, are so concerned about rising carbon emissions, why then are they happy to increase our exports of coal?
The answer is, just like the fraudulent carbon tax, MONEY!

All very standard denier's furfees Toots.

Meanwhile in the real world Ice Sheets Melting at higher rates and now Permafrost is also melting.
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/cl...201-2an5d.html
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...predicted.html
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/cl...127-2a5tp.html

But it's ok Toots, it's not happening because Flannery was wrong about dam levels. Herein lies the problem debating deniers Toots, you guys rely exclusively on straws.

Chook.

[Guest]

Here ya Toots, Greg Jerico spells out where and how you're being mislead by reading deniers websites and listening to morons like Allan Jones and Andrew Bolt.

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/4465...WT.svl=theDrum

Chook.