Originally posted by kobber
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
800 Peer Reviewed Papers Deny Man Made CC
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Poptech View Posthob-knocker, you are right I really put your buddy in his place.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hob-knockerAre you also a teabagger?
Guess what though, come the November U.S. congressional elections when we throw out all the socialists, global warming legislation will be officially dead in the water and we can then move on to growing our economy way beyond #1. It has to break your heart but you will get over it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Poptech View Posthob-knocker, no I do not partake in your sexual behaviors.
Guess what though, come the November U.S. congressional elections when we throw out all the socialists, global warming legislation will be officially dead in the water and we can then move on to growing our economy way beyond #1. It has to break your heart but you will get over it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Poptech View Posthob-knocker, no I do not partake in your sexual behaviors.
Guess what though, come the November U.S. congressional elections when we throw out all the socialists, global warming legislation will be officially dead in the water and we can then move on to growing our economy way beyond #1. It has to break your heart but you will get over it.
Us "soft power" is still strong aswell. I know so many ppl who really beleive America maintains a positive effect in the world.
Hey, if the fires start getting to bad in LA just drop the bomb
Comment
-
Thank God global warming is a myth or we'd all be toast
http://www.news.com.au/world/russian...-1225903171451
Comment
-
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/2...-manipulation/
Kobber you need to read about the medieval warming period which was hotter than today.
I wonder what humans contribution to carbon emissions was then?
Comment
-
Originally posted by rcptn View Posthttp://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/2...-manipulation/
Kobber you need to read about the medieval warming period which was hotter than today.
I wonder what humans contribution to carbon emissions was then?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#38633455
Comment
-
Originally posted by kobber View PostThose full armour suits must have been murder. RSVP/PTS like your thoughts on this
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#38633455Last edited by rcptn; 08-10-2010, 08:25 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rcptn View PostNASA is not a trustworthy source for anyting imho and is run by a nutter called James Hansen. That Dr Jay Swally made a ludicrous claim that the current climate in washington has changed from 20 - 30 years ago. Imho opinion the climate has not changed at all in my 42 years in the areas I have lived.
Comment
-
Who the **** cares about Global Warming, not me thats for one.
I could not give a stuff whether the planet is warming or cooling, lets just look after the damn thing.
All the arguements both for and against, is so far away from remotely doing anything for the planet that its ridiculous.
So **** all the lying bastards that keep talking about it, because they are really not interested in doing anything environmentally worth while.The Internet is a place for posting silly things
Try and be serious and you will look stupid
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kingbilly View PostI could not give a stuff whether the planet is warming or cooling, lets just look after the damn thing.
All the arguements both for and against, is so far away from remotely doing anything for the planet that its ridiculous.
.
wonderful conservative strategy.......don't talk about it........just do it.........it will all work out..........or THE MARKET IS ALWAYS RIGHT.....lol
Comment
-
neither party can convince me one way or the other, so I think the point KB makes is a fair one-we need to look after the environment, no matter what the cause or effects of climate change are.
i agree with the point made earlier too-of course the dates of articles are relevant-years ago scientists thought the world was flat-new research frequently disproves or changes the findings!!! i'm sure theres articles in the past that support nearly any crazy shit i can come up with! if you're trying to convince someone of an argument at least present current fact and research
Comment
-
Originally posted by my_dogs_named_fitzy View Postneither party can convince me one way or the other, so I think the point KB makes is a fair one-we need to look after the environment, no matter what the cause or effects of climate change are.
i agree with the point made earlier too-of course the dates of articles are relevant-years ago scientists thought the world was flat-new research frequently disproves or changes the findings!!! i'm sure theres articles in the past that support nearly any crazy shit i can come up with! if you're trying to convince someone of an argument at least present current fact and research
In those 800 peer reviewed papers there are a lot that were published in the last 5 years. Anyway my original point stands I'm sure the new climate change commission of 5 so called experts who present evidence to the citizens assembly will not present any of this info because it is not pro man made climate change. In my view the climate change commission should have 2 out 5 man made climate change sceptics experts but will not have any.
Comment
Comment