Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This is why that ignorant halfwit Tony Abbott must never become PM.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This is why that ignorant halfwit Tony Abbott must never become PM.

    He is a dangerous, fundamentalist in his thinking and he his a raging farking moron of the highest calibre.

    http://www.smh.com.au/environment/cl...301-1bd7q.html

    TONY ABBOTT has ordered his troops to focus on the government during what will be a protracted climate change debate and to shelve their personal views so they do not become distracted by an internal fight over whether global warming is real.

    Mr Abbott issued the edict to his party room yesterday as the independent MP, Tony Windsor - one target of Mr Abbott's call for a ''people's revolt'' - revealed he had received death threats.

    Mr Windsor told the Seven Network that unless the harsh language of the debate so far was toned down, inside Parliament and on talkback radio, there could be another shooting like that of the Arizona congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.

    ''We're getting very close … to going over the edge,'' he said.

    Mr Abbott called yesterday for ''tens of thousands of people'' to ''bombard'' Labor and independent MPs with emails, phone calls and letters, and to bail them up in the street.

    He and Julia Gillard continued to trade blows in Parliament yesterday after both gave rallying cries to their troops.

    Mr Abbott told the party room that regardless of personal points of view, the Coalition accepted that humans contributed to climate change and MPs and senators must focus on Ms Gillard for breaking her promise not to introduce a carbon tax.

    ''This is a tax issue, not an issue about climate change,'' he said. ''Yes, we believe climate change is real, yes, we believe humans make a contribution towards climate change.''

    The Nationals leader, Warren Truss, said ''this is about a prime minister who is a liar''.

    Mr Abbott, who once described climate change science as ''absolute crap'', presides over a party about half of which disputes that humans contribute to climate change.

    Ms Gillard told caucus to prepare for a long and hard debate. Mr Abbott's ''culture of complaint'' ultimately would be exposed, she said. Just as he no longer complained about the flood levy after claiming it would bring down the government, so too would he be rendered mute by policy success on a carbon price.

    ''We will engage patiently, calmly, methodically,'' she said. ''Tony Abbott will appear increasingly hysterical and flaky.''

    Mr Abbott has promised to repeal the carbon tax if elected in 2013 but the Greens said they would block any such moves.

    Mr Abbott said the Senate would have to respect an ''overwhelming mandate''. ''I'm not assuming that the Senate will be hostile and I am assuming that should we win, we'll have a very strong mandate,'' he said.

    Another option would be for an Abbott government to call a double dissolution election if the Senate twice rejected legislation to repeal the tax.

    Ms Gillard said this would create investment uncertainty and ''rip out of the purses and the wallets of householders that assistance that we have provided them and which they have factored into their family budgets''.

    ''Directors, businesses, boards would make decisions, they would start employing people, and then Mr Abbott would come and sweep that away, recklessly stranding those investments and losing those jobs,'' she said.
    __________________________________________________ ____________

    He believes manking is contributing to global warming but will actively campaign against a measure to address mankind's contribution for the sake of political point scoring.

    Here you are liberal voters, your moronic ****ing hero in all his two-faced, lying, backflipping, do nothing, complaining, bullshit infested glory!

    If this clown ever becomes PM we are farked.

    Chook.

  • #2
    Chook he probably believes we are only having a tiny effect on climate change then his stance is totally consistent and correct.

    Comment


    • #3
      Chook,

      Please detail how many degrees a Carbon Tax will lower the Earths Temperature by.
      Alcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk.

      Comment


      • #4
        As for Windsors claim that he had a death threat that is just ridiculous. I have heard the call several times and it was not a death threat it was vicious caller that hoped he would die.

        Comment


        • #5
          The Coalition Believes in Climate change. We all do. Its been changing for billions of years. The Coalition says man contributes to it. Sure Thats plausible although i dont believe our CO2 emissions of 340 ppm make the Earth warmer. Neither do Atmospheric scientists.

          Lets lower emissions of CO2? Why? Its nuts. Its an inert gas that helps plants grow and does not heat the planet. The pretense that CO2 is Carbon Pollution is false.

          I would pour money to stop Carbon Monoxide production, other toxic LEad based emissions, chemical runoff into rivers and harbours. Yes Yes Yes . Improve our water and air quality.

          THATS what the government should focus on.

          Global Warming and the fairy tale that man causes it through industry, is designed to shift money from us to developing polluters. The organisers of this scam, the Al Gores of the world and the Goldman Sachs, skim the cream, off the top and make billions. Its a pyramid scheme. It is a rort. its a lie. and the Australian Government is complicit and heaviily involved in the crime.
          Alcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by melon.... View Post
            The Coalition Believes in Climate change. We all do. Its been changing for billions of years. The Coalition says man contributes to it. Sure Thats plausible although i dont believe our CO2 emissions of 340 ppm make the Earth warmer. Neither do Atmospheric scientists.
            Which ones melon, link it.

            Originally posted by melon.... View Post
            Lets lower emissions of CO2? Why? Its nuts. Its an inert gas that helps plants grow and does not heat the planet. The pretense that CO2 is Carbon Pollution is false.
            So I take it you haven't wrapped your lips around a tail pipe or sealed your head in a pastic bag yet melon to test your statement? Can you please advise when you will so I can be there to see it.

            Originally posted by melon.... View Post
            I would pour money to stop Carbon Monoxide production, other toxic LEad based emissions, chemical runoff into rivers and harbours. Yes Yes Yes . Improve our water and air quality.

            THATS what the government should focus on.
            THAT'S WHAT A CARBON TAX WILL DO MELON REDUCE POLLUTING IN OUR AIR!!! Geesus farking christ it's like talking to a wall!

            Originally posted by melon.... View Post
            Global Warming and the fairy tale that man causes it through industry, is designed to shift money from us to developing polluters. The organisers of this scam, the Al Gores of the world and the Goldman Sachs, skim the cream, off the top and make billions. Its a pyramid scheme. It is a rort. its a lie. and the Australian Government is complicit and heaviily involved in the crime.
            Bingo! And in springs the right-wing conspiracy theory bullshit. Honestly mate, do you actually believe this shit cause if you do, if you really believe this garbage than you need professional help. Or maybe you can join the 911 truthers, I hear they are looking for some extremely gullible people. Ask rcptn, he's a card carrying member.

            You are a true liberal melon. You consider it plausable that mankind is contributing to global warming through but it isn't plausable that a reduction in man made pollution will reduce that global warming.

            Chook.

            Comment


            • #7
              nother option would be for an Abbott government to call a double dissolution election if the Senate twice rejected legislation to repeal the tax.


              Maybe this is what he's got in mind.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by shadow View Post
                nother option would be for an Abbott government to call a double dissolution election if the Senate twice rejected legislation to repeal the tax.


                Maybe this is what he's got in mind.
                Only the PM can call a double dissallusion election.

                Chook.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Chook View Post

                  You consider it plausable that mankind is contributing to global warming through but it isn't plausable that a reduction in man made pollution will reduce that global warming.

                  Chook.
                  Sounds pretty whacky Chook..

                  So does someone believing that handing over their hard earned cash to Julia and Wayne is going to effect world climate change..

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Pass the Ball View Post
                    Sounds pretty whacky Chook..

                    So does someone believing that handing over their hard earned cash to Julia and Wayne is going to effect world climate change..
                    If you're truly stupid enough to believe handing over your hard earned to Julia and Wayne will effect world climate change than that's your problem. I don't. But I do believe a reduction in CO2 emissions through a carbon tax will effect world climate change. Do you?

                    Chook.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Chook View Post
                      If you're truly stupid enough to believe handing over your hard earned to Julia and Wayne will effect world climate change than that's your problem. I don't. But I do believe a reduction in CO2 emissions through a carbon tax will effect world climate change. Do you?

                      Chook.
                      I do not think that little Australia can effect world climate change, No.
                      I am however, all for reducing CO2 emissions as well as other pollutants. Just not through a TAX.

                      If the notion is so stupid, why are you advocating the hand over of cash to Julia and Wayne..?
                      Last edited by Pass the Ball; 03-02-2011, 12:19 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Chook View Post
                        If you're truly stupid enough to believe handing over your hard earned to Julia and Wayne will effect world climate change than that's your problem. I don't. But I do believe a reduction in CO2 emissions through a carbon tax will effect world climate change. Do you?

                        Chook.
                        Not unless the world does and it won't so we'll be pissing into the wind.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Chook View Post
                          Which ones melon, link it.



                          So I take it you haven't wrapped your lips around a tail pipe or sealed your head in a pastic bag yet melon to test your statement? Can you please advise when you will so I can be there to see it.



                          THAT'S WHAT A CARBON TAX WILL DO MELON REDUCE POLLUTING IN OUR AIR!!! Geesus farking christ it's like talking to a wall!



                          Bingo! And in springs the right-wing conspiracy theory bullshit. Honestly mate, do you actually believe this shit cause if you do, if you really believe this garbage than you need professional help. Or maybe you can join the 911 truthers, I hear they are looking for some extremely gullible people. Ask rcptn, he's a card carrying member.

                          You are a true liberal melon. You consider it plausable that mankind is contributing to global warming through but it isn't plausable that a reduction in man made pollution will reduce that global warming.

                          Chook.
                          Chook, Car fumes that poison people are mostly comprised of Carbon Monoxide, not big bad plant food carbon dioxide.

                          If I die with my head in a plastic bag it wont be the CO2 that kills me, but rather the other stuff like the Nitrogen and Oxygen blend I need to inhale so my organs continue working. And I would invite you....only so that you can hear my last words "See I told you !!"


                          A tax will never control the world's temperature. If yo believe it will, please detail by how many degrees.

                          Oh and 10% of this tax has been earmarked for the UN. Thats Gillards words not mine. But I do stand corrected, because since the floods, this Carbon Tax isnt primarily about wealth redistribution. It now shifts its focus, to delivering the undeliverable under Labor. A Surplus for 2012/13.

                          Im going out for some fresh air.
                          Last edited by melon....; 03-02-2011, 03:58 PM.
                          Alcohol never solved any life problems.....then again neither did milk.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by melon.... View Post
                            Chook, A tax will never control the world's temperature. If you believe it will, please detail by how many degrees.
                            Expect a detailed answer from Chook here.

                            Chook, don't forget the pissing into the wind degree.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              When it comes to the economic effect of the carbon tax on Australia, I look to Ross Greenwood rather than Ross Garnaut who was responsible for the near destruction...hell, it has been destroyed...of the fabric and textiles industry back in the mid-80s when he told Hawke and Keating to deregulate it.

                              Ross Greenwood stated that the Carbox tax is being touted to balance the books, nothing more.

                              Even if you believe that human beings have any measurable effect on this planet then maybe you should try and embrace a rational thought and accept that Australia and it's contributions are about 1/1000th of China and India.

                              The people out there that want to give their money to the government, they have ways and means without bringing in a tax that the rational and sane people do not want to pay to help this spendthrift government cover their backsides.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X