Originally posted by Paddo Colt 61
View Post
1. As noted, I've read this [disputed, selectively] 'leaked cable' and addressed it on multiple occasions (noting it agrees that killings happened on the way to and from the square but the particular person did not observe what happened in the square). It's a red herring at best for you to STILL be focussing on whether or not all the killings happened inside the square. Noting, there's multiple other cables (including the one that Bob Hawke leaked) and eye witness accounts.
PS - so you know, a communique is not the same thing as a cable (a communique is an agreement between leaders at say a G20 meeting whereas a cable is a message that is sent internally between government officials... they are generally 'secret' on the basis that they are for internal usage only, on the basis that they are a WIP and facts are yet to be properly fleshed out. Hence why they may well contain a heap of seemingly conflicting versions of events as people are trying to piece things together). Nice try at using big words though...
2. It's a good question... why did the CCP arrest & kill people then try its hardest to burn all the evidence? Happy to discuss your thoughts on why they did this. Again, noting it's an established fact that even today the mention of the massacre in China will lead to your arrest. This topic requires discussion before it is of any value to go further - you cannot ignore the elephant in the room.
Comment