Originally posted by Random Rooster
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Federal Election
Collapse
X
-
random - yes, the australian economy has had long term growth, but was it because of the recession or because of the economic reforms that hawke and keating implemented? would those reforms have been less effective if they'd raised interest rates a bit sooner than they did and achieved a smoother slow down?
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Random Rooster View Post
Thats because it actually was the recession we had to have.....
http://www.marketeconomics.com.au/24...we-had-to-have
What didn't help was standing up to Kerry Packer. Keating as Treasurer had overseen new media rules that prevented media owners from owning both TV stations and newspapers....which infuriated Packer (he wanted to buy Fairfax print media) who went on a anti-Keating rampage.Anyone remember the 60 Minutes program on Packer’s Nine Network in the late 1990s that falsely alleged Keating had been involved in dodgy dealings during his ownership of a piggery, later sold on to Indonesian interests?? Packers personal attacks on Keating were infamous albeit lacking any truth. Interesting days!!!
Of course in 2007 the Howard government began the unravelling of Paul Keating's cross media regulations. Howard had to pay back the massive push he got to be PM from Packer....even if it was to the detriment of the Australian people.
Surely now im in Paddos good books???!!!???.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by A Country Member View PostOh really? Never heard that!
I am sure they are ruing the day when house were cheap but money was expensive instead of cheap money and expensive houses. Just hope they had superannuation to help them get by
Comment
-
PS - to those still following the election there have been the following updates:
- Greens won Brisbane, so progressives now have a lower-house majority. ALP's predicted to win Macnamara, which would give them an outright majority in the lower house (just to please the bitter Tories who were trying to say it wasn't a valid win... despite the fact the Libs have literally never formed a majority in the lower house, so are always strong-armed by the Nats).
- The senate's likely to be a progressive majority with ALP on 26, Greens on 12 and Pocock on 1. IMO this will be pretty neat as we'll finally get some proper debates going on about issues that matter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by zac View Postrandom - yes, the australian economy has had long term growth, but was it because of the recession or because of the economic reforms that hawke and keating implemented? would those reforms have been less effective if they'd raised interest rates a bit sooner than they did and achieved a smoother slow down?
You would make a good Australian treasurer! Do you work in the finance field?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Random Rooster View Post
Yes very good point Zac and in hindsight you are probably right....i don't think they would have been less effective if the interest rate was pushed up sooner- but the high interest rate was causing a lot of pain as it was- it would have been a brave move.
You would make a good Australian treasurer! Do you work in the finance field?
the other thing about the seat count is that the independent in fowler is a good chance to be disqualified. don't know what the rules of vietnamese citizenship are but a google search suggests that they're enough to mean that dai le has a problem.
Comment
Comment