Originally posted by pearcesworstnightmare
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2 things from Origin already
Collapse
X
-
uate is not over rated he just isnt ready for soo, playing against uate iv seen what he can do and i think in time he will become a big player for nsw. i have no problem with the way slater goes for the ball in the air, many players lead with knees and there is no problem with that so why single slater out???
Comment
-
Originally posted by mattyboi89 View Postuate is not over rated he just isnt ready for soo, playing against uate iv seen what he can do and i think in time he will become a big player for nsw. i have no problem with the way slater goes for the ball in the air, many players lead with knees and there is no problem with that so why single slater out???
No offense but if he hasn't shown "what he can do" 4 years into his career then I'm afraid he could only do it in the juniors where I assume you played him..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hawkeye View PostQld's kicking game is a hundred times better. They find the grass constantly, every one of Pearce or Carney's kick found the back three on the full !
Oh and Uate is a massive liability, he runs hard but is mistake riddled ...kinda like Manu Vatuvei
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster85 View PostHe is over rated - he's talked up as the best winger in the comp, which is something he isn't, and if he is not ready for S.O.O now then he never will be.
No offense but if he hasn't shown "what he can do" 4 years into his career then I'm afraid he could only do it in the juniors where I assume you played him..
Comment
-
Why weren't we awarded a penalty try when Cronk was binned for being a grub?
In hindsight doesn't matter but we we potentially would have been up by an extra try if the refs didn't screw us. If QLD had scored in the final minutes I think more would be dirty about this call.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chook Norris View PostCarney outplayed Pearce tonight.. but both definitely needed a lot more patience and smart about the boot. Way way too many hopeful bombs
Comment
-
Originally posted by pearcesworstnightmare View PostWatch again dead shit, Uate looks at "The Cross Eyed Fiddler" as if to say " are you gunna catch it " by that time it was too late.
It was Not Uates ball.
Comment
-
Farah still tries to do too much out of dummy half with his decision making and kicking, he cut Pearce out a few times when there was space out wide. And Pearce's kicking was part of the game plan imo. He turned QLD around and made their pack work it out from deep in their half time and time again.
What Pearce needs to do more of is take the line on with the ball in both hands and ball play at the line not before it, he has a good short ball. In the couple of times he did last night he had the QLD defenders flat footed, all he needed was a support player and he'd put them through a hole.
Chook.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ism22 View PostWhy weren't we awarded a penalty try when Cronk was binned for being a grub?
In hindsight doesn't matter but we we potentially would have been up by an extra try if the refs didn't screw us. If QLD had scored in the final minutes I think more would be dirty about this call.
You heard Archer say to Gallen "we had to be certain Carney would have scored".
This has always been the rule regarding penalty tries and is flawed. If enforced to the letter, nobody can ever be awarded a penalty try, as you can't be 100% certain about anything. What if the player about to score when he is fouled has a stroke or cardiac arrest? What if he is struck by a meteor? What if an eagle swoops down onto the field and steals the football?
See what I mean? If a player deliberately commits a foul with the direct result (not on one or two tackles before) that an attacking player is unfairly denied the chance to score a try that, ON THE BALANCE OF PROBABILITY, he would otherwise have scored, then a penalty try should be awarded. Not this "certainty" bullshit, or even "beyond a reasonable doubt" (nobody is being sentenced to execution by lethal injection). Cronk manipulated this rule last night and 10 in the bin was not sufficient punishment.
This rule should be changed immediately.
Comment
-
Originally posted by player 1 View PostI agree with this.
You heard Archer say to Gallen "we had to be certain Carney would have scored".
This has always been the rule regarding penalty tries and is flawed. If enforced to the letter, nobody can ever be awarded a penalty try, as you can't be 100% certain about anything. What if the player about to score when he is fouled has a stroke or cardiac arrest? What if he is struck by a meteor? What if an eagle swoops down onto the field and steals the football?
See what I mean? If a player deliberately commits a foul with the direct result (not on one or two tackles before) that an attacking player is unfairly denied the chance to score a try that, ON THE BALANCE OF PROBABILITY, he would otherwise have scored, then a penalty try should be awarded. Not this "certainty" bullshit, or even "beyond a reasonable doubt" (nobody is being sentenced to execution by lethal injection). Cronk manipulated this rule last night and 10 in the bin was not sufficient punishment.
This rule should be changed immediately.
Comment
-
Comment