Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Konrad Hurrell
Collapse
X
-
When you trust your television
what you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
they can bend it all they want
John Mayer
-
Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat View PostI see Hurrell as a future forward...just too big and stocky to remain in the centres I would think.
Moga will have him for speed and mobility every time in the backs...we have the right one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster85 View PostR6 is still bitter because of the way he talked about Hurrell before he played, and dominated, us..
Made him look a fool.
You post some illogical shit sometimes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostHow did him playing well disprove my statement that he had achieved nothing to date and that people were overrating him purely based on potentia?
You post some illogical shit sometimes.
And now you are getting bitter and trying to bring this back on me. Classic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster85 View PostBecause you were wrong, and you can never seem to accept when you are - no matter the subject.
And now you are getting bitter and trying to bring this back on me. Classic.
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostDon't confuse match fitness with natural fitness, he's never been able to play the full 80 minutes even in the Under 20's. Also he was dropped back to the NSW Cup to work on his defence and rightly so, he's woeful.
A promising talent sure but he's done nothing to date, a few big runs doesn't make you a first grader.
1) That he can't play the full 80 minutes?
2) That he's a woeful defender?
3) That he hadn't achieved anything to date before the Roosters game?
I still stand by all those assertions, at the time he hadn't achieved anything, he still hasn't shown the durability and fitness to play 80 minutes & he still hasn't proven himself in defence. If you disagree at least put a half decent argument together...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostHere's my quote...
What was I wrong about?
1) That he can't play the full 80 minutes?
2) That he's a woeful defender?
3) That he hadn't achieved anything to date before the Roosters game?
I still stand by all those assertions, at the time he hadn't achieved anything, he still hasn't shown the durability and fitness to play 80 minutes & he still hasn't proven himself in defence. If you disagree at least put a half decent argument together...
The main point being from the Roosters game onwards he is scoring a try a game Instead of acknowledging this you still pick holes in his game I have no doubt you will continue to do so throughout his career whenever he is mentioned on here
As I f I would bet with you I dont know you so therfore I have major reservations about whether you would pay up or honour your bet if you loseWhen you trust your television
what you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
they can bend it all they want
John Mayer
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat View PostI see Hurrell as a future forward...just too big and stocky to remain in the centres I would think.
Moga will have him for speed and mobility every time in the backs...we have the right one.
Why would you consider him for the forwards when he is killing it as a centre. Confusing!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thirteen View Post.
Why would you consider him for the forwards when he is killing it as a centre. Confusing!#We Stand with ourJewish community#
Comment
-
Originally posted by Andrew Walker View PostThe other guy is right You are a bitter person As Hurrell has shown you up to be a goose
The main point being from the Roosters game onwards he is scoring a try a game Instead of acknowledging this you still pick holes in his game I have no doubt you will continue to do so throughout his career whenever he is mentioned on here
As I f I would bet with you I dont know you so therfore I have major reservations about whether you would pay up or honour your bet if you lose
Vatuvei & Graham fall into the same category, even SKD. Just because I bag them doesn't mean I don't rate their attacking ability they're all very very effective at what they do best but they're not well rounded players and thus don't deserve the accolades they get all the time imo. After all defense is 50% of the game...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostHere's my quote...
What was I wrong about?
1) That he can't play the full 80 minutes?
2) That he's a woeful defender?
3) That he hadn't achieved anything to date before the Roosters game?
I still stand by all those assertions, at the time he hadn't achieved anything, he still hasn't shown the durability and fitness to play 80 minutes & he still hasn't proven himself in defence. If you disagree at least put a half decent argument together...
2) Agree to a certain extent, but he is no worse than plenty of centres who have been playing first grade for years.
3) Of course, he hadn't, he played about 3 games and they were from the bench, the thing is you wrote him off as a threat against us and he made you look like a fool.
Heck you even said he isn't a First Grader, lol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostLike the other guy you can't even pinpoint what I was wrong about, you assume that I never rated his attacking ability because I talked him down. I said the same thing when everyone was getting wet about Uate, now everyone is starting to realise what a clumsy idiot he is.
Vatuvei & Graham fall into the same category, even SKD. Just because I bag them doesn't mean I don't rate their attacking ability they're all very very effective at what they do best but they're not well rounded players and thus don't deserve the accolades they get all the time imo. After all defense is 50% of the game...
I can only think of 3, maybe 4.
Hurrell's defense is first grade standard, especially considering he has played League for a year and a half. How often have you seen him f*ck up in defense lately?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster85 View Post1) Well yes, you were actually, he has been killing it over the course of 80 minutes for months now.
2) Agree to a certain extent, but he is no worse than plenty of centres who have been playing first grade for years.
3) Of course, he hadn't, he played about 3 games and they were from the bench, the thing is you wrote him off as a threat against us and he made you look like a fool.
Heck you even said he isn't a First Grader, lol.
So the only point you disagree with is the first one, that he doesn't have the fitness or durability to play the full 80 minutes. This despite the fact that in his 12 NRL games he's only played the full 80 minutes (at centre) in 6 of them.. that's 50% of his games. Even though I disagree with you on this I do think this is the least of his worries because it's a physical ability that can easily be rectified. More of worry is his defence.
I never once said he didn't have the potential to be a good player, in fact the contrary I said he did. Stop making assumptions because I'm not getting carried away with this bloke like the rest of the media and some supporters are, he's got a long way to go.
I've said similar things about Moga in that past, doesn't mean I don't rate the kid imo he's the most talented youngster I've ever seen come through the system but he's still got defensive issues and struggles to get involved in the play. Are you going to take that as me not rating him now too?
Comment
Comment