Inglis Head High Tackle On Young

[player 1]

Serious injury to a defenseless ball carrier (Young) by Inglis with direct contact to the face using arm.

Young carried off in medicab. Inglis laughing after being put on report.

Something stinks. You take a player out of the game with a high tackle, you get sent off, it's not that complicated.

What is wrong, exactly, with these arse pirates in pink?

[Guest]

yeah, he definitely should have been sent off
coward act, cheap shot. hes a grub.
the refs need to stop this, and the only way is to start sending people off
Young will be out for a long time now, and will probably have problems in the future.

Inglis will be out for a couple of weeks now

[Rooster_6]

Then Dragons get denied what should have been at the worst a BOTD try.

Someones looking out for Souffs tonight.

[Guest]

That dirty cat should have gone for that. With what we have seen over the past few weeks with high shots, the poofs in pink had the perfect opportunity to make an example of a situation (not the player) and they just let is pass. Souffs are fast becomming the new Melb. Not in ability, but in being a protected species.

Fvark souffs.

[player 1]

Then Dragons get denied what should have been at the worst a BOTD try.

Someones looking out for Souffs tonight.

Tell me about it. That was another hilarious example of the video ref manipulating to give a bogus decision. The last shot, which they allowed to linger, was of the ball being off the ground after it had crossed the tryline. But the previous frame, where the ball appeared to touch the chalk, was not looked at again. That was the shot that should have got the BOD call - no way they could say that didn't touch the chalk with certainty.

And how biased are Smith and Brandy? Regarding the Inglis head high, they keep saying it was a "big hit". No talk whatsoever of the prospect he should have been sent off - which was the obvious correct decision. I don't know how the dragons players can restrain themselves, especially after Inglis laughed at Young being carried off, from putting a swinging arm to his jungle monkey head the next time he's held in a tackle unable to defend himself.

[redwhiteblue]

That dirty cat should have gone for that. With what we have seen over the past few weeks with high shots, the poofs in pink had the perfect opportunity to make an example of a situation (not the player) and they just let is pass. Souffs are fast becomming the new Melb. Not in ability, but in being a protected species.

Fvark souffs.

Some of your finest Filthy!

[Kingbilly]

While I think it was a low act, I am not sure he should have been sent.
I thought a couple of tackles last night were worse and should have resulted in send offs and I do believe the Refs are being pea hearts.
I thought Burgess should have been penalised for his late hit on Morris after the try.

No doubt $ouff$ are getting toughness confused with filth.

I can't really cope with this game, its just too confusing seeing St George getting refereed out of the game.

[player 1]

Is Everingham a mong?

[player 1]

If it was a low act, which it was, and the result was a player taken out of the game, what makes you unsure he should have been sent off?

[elo]

Lucky Inglis wasn't wearing a tricolour jersey, would have been sent for sure if he were.

[Geohood]

Lucky Inglis wasn't wearing a tricolour jersey, would have been sent for sure if he were.

Or JWH..

[Guest]

If that was JWH he would have been sent.

[Guest]

Careless nothing more, he may do a week on the sidelines.

[kurtsherlock6]

Careless nothing more, he may do a week on the sidelines.

Should be at least a month, but i'm sure he will get the "benefit of the doubt".

[kurtsherlock6]

Then Dragons get denied what should have been at the worst a BOTD try.

Someones looking out for Souffs tonight.

They've been looked after all year.

Fark Souffs!