Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Conspiracy theory

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Yeah he was in front of the kicker. It was close, but I think the refs were caught up in the moment and didn't think about the offside.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by stephenj View Post
      youll laugh at me but i think we can knock off the dogs in the last round? that would let melbourne finish first? then play a harder team? thus giving the dogs an easier run into the grand final?
      Not laughing stephen. I picked us NOT to lose our last game weeks ago! It will just rub salt into the wound that we can beat a side like that when its all too late.

      Comment


      • #18
        I cannot see us winning against the mutts We will have a red hot go in our last home game against the tigers thern clock off the following week With playerrs more concerned about staying able bodied for the mad sunday/monday drinkathon
        When you trust your television
        what you get is what you got
        Cause when they own the information
        they can bend it all they want

        John Mayer

        Comment


        • #19
          Yes the Dog's are getting the favoured treatment the Dragon's got in 2010 can it get any more obvious,really felt sorry for Robbie last night that was disgusting....

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by ARES View Post
            Yes the Dog's are getting the favoured treatment the Dragon's got in 2010 can it get any more obvious,really felt sorry for Robbie last night that was disgusting....
            Right on!!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Easts 2034 View Post
              Do you expect every team to only have one good player? Just shut up, please.
              No, what kind of a conspiracy would it be if the Chooks had just 1 player of that quality? Surely we'd be cheating.

              Comment


              • #22
                We really need to start winning games, for no other reason than it MIGHT stop our own fans embarrassing us with stupid sentiment.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                  Adsding to tonights match I had a smeaking suspicion Mutts 2nd try the try scorer was in front of Keating the kicker
                  It was Reynolds & I was yelling at the screen that he was a yard in front of Keating, could not understand how it wasn't picked up by any of the 5 officials, unbelievable!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    why are the dogs getting the benefit of the doubt? the rub of the green? the biasedrefs, turning a blind eye?
                    its the nrl vs afl battle.
                    with the gws giants coming into the competition, the nrl had to do something to ensure that rugby league was the sport in sydneys west.
                    it was gws vs the bulldogs, tigers, panthers and eels.
                    sure the giants are coming last, but its their first year, but they got 15000 fans or something like that to their first game, and that was embarrassing apparently. when was the last time the roosters got 15000 to a game?
                    anyway, in a battle where the nrl had to dominate, the panthers and the eels are running last or second last, and the tigers lost 5 were 1 and 5 at the start of may. something had to be done.
                    que nrl hq - the bulldogs will win the 2012 nrl premiership. if we want rugby league to be the dominant sport in western sydney, then every decision must go the bulldogs, every match official must ensure that they do whatever they can to help the bulldogs win.
                    yes. fixing.
                    how would you feel if you were in charge of it all? so guilty, that i would step down. what about you david gallop?

                    is this what rugby league has become?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                      Adsding to tonights match I had a smeaking suspicion Mutts 2nd try the try scorer was in front of Keating the kicker
                      It bloody was AW I had a running battle all night with a Bullscum mate over it unbelievable how that didn't go to the video ref.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Felt bad after that try. I always barrack for anyone who plays against either the scumdogs or the vermin. I particularly like the tigers and the way that they play very entertaining footy. If I wasn't a rooster through and through, I'd be barracking for wests. I think that one other pleasing aspect about them is that they have that "never say die " attitude, which we had in 2010 but have lost in the following years.

                        How he gave that a try is impossible to understand, especially after the touch judge pointed it out to the ref.
                        Comment of the year:

                        Andrew Johns, Semi-Final vs North Queensland ,

                        "It's touched Lui's hand and travelled forward but that's not a knock on"

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          It was just so blatant you just have to wonder what's going on.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            There are fair comments here on the battle of the west due to afl and favoritism to the vermin however the whole factor includes the gambling element via centre bet etc - I hate the subliminal gambling comments by commentators and centre bets influence in games as evident of last nite and I back that comment up by the state of origin inglis try and the telegraph headline the next day about up to the minute gambling with a pic of the game - co incidental I think not

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by John View Post
                              BOD is when the video ref thinks a player has scored and Ref's call is when he can't form a stronger opinion than the ref, who offers what he thinks.
                              Thanks for explaining it. I understand now. The referees can read each other's minds. It is extraordinary they possess extra-sensory perception, yet lack the basic senses such as eyesight.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by John View Post
                                BOD is when the video ref thinks a player has scored and Ref's call is when he can't form a stronger opinion than the ref, who offers what he thinks.
                                I think you will find that BOD is when the video ref wants to give a 50/50 try and Refs Call is where the video ref wants the 50/50 try to be denied.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X