Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ban on Shoulder charge in 2013.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by BigMike View Post
    This is another problem that i have with the report. They only counted 71 shoulder charges in a season? How did they reach that number?

    Their definition of a shoulder charge(no use of arms) happens at least ten times a game. Just think of every kickoff when the defenders meet the prop steaming back in. Almost always one of them will come in with the shoulder.

    FFS - Sandow will pull off at least one or two a game (and fail each time)

    This just seems like a massive overreaction by trying to appease to the PC brigade.

    There's a reason our game is still going despite many attempts to kill it off. The gladitorial product was by far and away the best in this country - and the world. Change the product and join RU by fading into oblivion.
    I will make a bet with you now mate that the physicality of our game will not change.

    In a few years there will be hardly anyone left playing 1st grade who remembers the shoulder charge. They've been banned up until 18s for years now.

    In 5 years if we are still here and can determine if anything has changed dramatically the loser buys the winner the drink of their choice.

    I do agree the determining of what constitutes a shoulder charge is interesting and what they will actually penalize next season will be even more interesting.

    I really expect it's just more a legal fallback, the new rule, than anything. There will be the odd head clash from such a tackle, as there is still the odd accidental spear tackle, but at least now the game as a whole will not be able to be sued if someone gets badly injured.

    Remember Crackers suing Kearney for a spear tackle??? Had the rule banning such a tackle not been made he could've sued the game as a whole, duty of care sorta shit.

    It's the world we live in, we have to accept it and move with the times IMO.



    The FlogPen .

    You know it makes sense.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Greedy666 View Post
      This isn't fair!

      I always have to wear the gimp suit.

      You know that thing chafes me!
      Johnsons Baby Powder is the answer, Gimpy666.



      The FlogPen .

      You know it makes sense.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by milanja View Post
        Does a mandatory week off go with any concussion in the nfl? im not sure, but does a slight concussion mean that you could miss the superbowl? Or in our case a grand final? Im not sure if one concussion is worse than another, so im not 100% if somebody decides the severity of one and then instructs you if you need a week off.
        IMO this will be the next move, independent ARLC doctors at each game, to determine the risk of concussion in players.

        I truly believe there will be some massive litigation in this area very soon, not just in the US but here also.



        The FlogPen .

        You know it makes sense.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Greedy666 View Post
          This isn't fair!

          I always have to wear the gimp suit.

          You know that thing chafes me!
          Did you borrow it off Mickey?
          Originally posted by turk-283
          Kurt 79 - Kags 0..

          Comment

          Working...
          X