Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Zillman Suspended

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Zillman Suspended

    BOTH parties could agree on one thing; there was no blood from the red mark on Jamie Simpson's arm. But that's not to say there won't be any more bad blood between them after Gold Coast fullback William Zillman was suspended for four matches after being found guilty of biting the South Sydney winger.

    Gold Coast officials immediately foreshadowed an appeal after Zillman became the first player suspended for biting since Brad Morrin in 2007 - after both players had painted vastly different pictures of a post-match conversation that was the centre of it.

    Zillman claimed that Simpson had told him ''I'm not going to say anything'' after the final whistle, while the winger said Zillman had told him: ''We'll see what happens.''

    ''I shook his hand and said 'Jamie, I'm really sorry, it was unintentional'. He took it really well,'' Zillman said. ''He just said, 'yeah mate, no worries, I'm not going to say anything'.''

    The three-man panel of Bob Lindner, Mark Coyne and Sean Garlick were shown a video tape taken at half-time by Souths officials Shane Richardson and Tony Henderson, which showed a red mark on Simpson's right forearm. NRL prosecutor Peter Kite also submitted a statement by Simpson, as well as reports by referees Tony Archer and Gerard Sutton and touch judge Chris James, who was the closest official to the incident when it occurred.

    The audio of the incident heard Simpson yell, ''F---, he bit me, he just bit me, he just bit me'' in James's direction, before later showing both on-field officials.

    Zillman's defence counsel, Geoff Bellew, suggested the motion that Simpson described during the hour-long hearing last night, as ''very forceful clamping down'', would have resulted in a more serious injury.

    ''Why is it that you don't see something more tangible in the nature of the injury,'' Bellew said. ''Where on earth is the injury that might be consistent with it? There isn't one.''

    Bellew also said Zillman's jaw did not move sufficiently to warrant a biting motion. ''It didn't happen and there was no biting action,'' he said.

    Zillman said he was ''just trying to square my head up to stand up'' when he turned his head and his mouth came into contact with Simpson's arm.

    ''I went to the ground and I felt a second movement,'' Zillman said. ''Jamie had control of my head … it [the grip] was pretty strong. That's what we're taught. You don't go in half-hearted. Having control of my head, there wasn't too much I could do. He was able to turn me around and slow the play-the-ball down.

    ''His arm was in my mouth but … I didn't clamp down. The minute I realised what was going on, I turned away.''

    Kite replied to that statement: ''It could be the minute you just realised what you'd done, you turned away.''

    Under cross-examination, Simpson said he had ''put my hand on the ball to slow the play-the-ball down'' and denied he had a hold of Zillman's head or neck.

    After the guilty finding, Kite tendered evidence of Morrin's bite on Parramatta's Timana Tahu, which resulted in an eight-match suspension for the Bulldogs player, as well as a photograph of the mark on Tahu's left arm.

    Kite asked the panel to consider a suspension of between four and five matches, while Bellew argued that the offence ''paled into insignificance'' when compared to Morrin's.

    ''This was a complete aberration and completely out of character, and he's entitled to a benefit for that,'' Bellew said.

    The suspension rules Zillman out until the second week of the finals. The Titans sit in third place on the competition table.

  • #2
    How could jamie simpson go full steam ahead and prosecute zillman. Shit go, Should of just forgotten about it.

    Comment


    • #3
      He never bit him.
      Its more a case of bullshit bitter souths players
      The Internet is a place for posting silly things
      Try and be serious and you will look stupid
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Kingbilly View Post
        He never bit him.
        Its more a case of bullshit bitter souths players
        exactly
        wasnt even a bite.
        bloody bullshitter jamie simpson is

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by sydneyroosterselyse View Post
          exactly
          wasnt even a bite.
          bloody bullshitter jamie simpson is
          It was a bite in the view of the officials and the panel but maybe you had a better view. You should have volunteered to be a witness

          Comment


          • #6
            watch the TV Kobber, it was plain to anyone that while his head changed position, his jaw didn't move.

            Read the submissions put by Souths people and you would think he put salt and pepper on him first
            The Internet is a place for posting silly things
            Try and be serious and you will look stupid
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #7
              Why would you dob???

              Fark me biting has always been part of the game.

              As has the old fashioned square up.

              Ogre said as much last week on the footy show, leave it on the field.



              The FlogPen .

              You know it makes sense.

              Comment


              • #8
                He also had a mouth guard..

                Comment


                • #9
                  Souffs players have no honour. bunch of snitches

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by stsae View Post
                    Why would you dob???

                    Fark me biting has always been part of the game.

                    As has the old fashioned square up.

                    Ogre said as much last week on the footy show, leave it on the field.

                    so which method did you find most effective. A quick nip with the incisors or a good old fashioned gnawing with the molars. Biting is the act of a woman as opposed to two men going at it with their fists. Also ive never heard of anyone setting out to feast on an opponent as part of a square up.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      oh please, women don't bite, we scratch. think eye gouge. biting is the act of a pathetic little boy.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        that one on timana tahu was a bite
                        simpson one was nothing...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by kobber View Post
                          so which method did you find most effective. A quick nip with the incisors or a good old fashioned gnawing with the molars. Biting is the act of a woman as opposed to two men going at it with their fists. Also ive never heard of anyone setting out to feast on an opponent as part of a square up.
                          I dont recall saying he had to bite him back to get square mate.

                          A get square can come in many forms. A sly knee in the balls, an old fashioned rib tickler or an old fashioned all in, just opening up on the biter.

                          Im not condoning biting. Its something thats been around as long as I played and watched footy though.

                          Sure its 2009 and such things are rare but it still happens.

                          I just learnt you never dob, you know the old what happens on the field stays on the field.

                          It may take a few years but payback is sweeeet.



                          The FlogPen .

                          You know it makes sense.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            sweet
                            paybacks a bitch

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X