Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Best Player in the NRL
Collapse
X
-
I saw too many games that were there to win and Fittler was no where to be seen for me to put him up there with the top of the greatest ever.
I also rate those players like Civonecena, Pearce (snr jnr) Ray Price and those sorts of players. They do have alot to do with the great play makers.
BUT I do not rate Steve Price among these players, he is a filthy myth. Sure he has the stats but in my opinion its one of those cases where stats don't tell the whole storyThe Internet is a place for posting silly things
Try and be serious and you will look stupid
sigpic
Comment
-
Who I have seen in the past.
Daley, IMO, was the complete footballer. He oozed class.
Lazzo had that ability to fire up his side to his level, a modern day great front rower. Where games are won and lost.
T Lamb was that bloke you always wanted in your side. What a tough footballer. Just loved the game and hated to lose.
Today, I go for Cam Smiff. I know his name sounds like a gay porn character. But hes an old head in a young body. A REAL footballer, not an athlete. Just has that influence on the field, hes irreplacable.
And that chin, its so un-footy it makes me .
The FlogPen .
You know it makes sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pass the Ball View PostThat said, who was the best player a couple of years back..??
Johns, Fittler, Lockyer...It is all still opinion..
Fittler in the late 90s/early 2000s
Then Johns
Then Lockyer.
Maybe Thurston afterwards, but his consistency in club football leaves something to be desired
Comment
-
Originally posted by knightsfan94 View PostFreddy was a great player and probably one of the most dominant of this modern era, but to rate him ahead of the likes of Johns, Lockyer and Lewis? He is a shadow compared to those 3.
You mention "this modern era". Keep in mind that Fittler began his first grade career a full four seasons before Johns, and was dominant in that era, too, playing for Australia at age 18. Johns' best and most dominant period coincided with the rise of, and aftermath of, Super League with its emphasis on artificially fast play the balls. But my major argument against Johns was his lack of durability, as I said. I don't think he ever played a full season.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View PostYou mention "this modern era". Keep in mind that Fittler began his first grade career a full four seasons before Johns, and was dominant in that era, too, playing for Australia at age 18. Johns' best and most dominant period coincided with the rise of, and aftermath of, Super League with its emphasis on artificially fast play the balls. But my major argument against Johns was his lack of durability, as I said. I don't think he ever played a full season.Loved by few, hated by many, respected by all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stsae View PostWho I have seen in the past.
Daley, IMO, was the complete footballer. He oozed class.
Lazzo had that ability to fire up his side to his level, a modern day great front rower. Where games are won and lost.
T Lamb was that bloke you always wanted in your side. What a tough footballer. Just loved the game and hated to lose.
Today, I go for Cam Smiff. I know his name sounds like a gay porn character. But hes an old head in a young body. A REAL footballer, not an athlete. Just has that influence on the field, hes irreplacable.
And that chin, its so un-footy it makes me .
Lucky they could play footy, they are a stroke short of a good wank these days
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View PostYou could argue that Johns, Lewis and Lockyer were marginally superior to Fittler. You could argue that. I wouldn't, but you could. But to say that Fittler is a "shadow" of those three is a ludicrous statement. It's like saying that Lara was a shadow of Tendulkar. There's a hairs breadth between them.
You mention "this modern era". Keep in mind that Fittler began his first grade career a full four seasons before Johns, and was dominant in that era, too, playing for Australia at age 18. Johns' best and most dominant period coincided with the rise of, and aftermath of, Super League with its emphasis on artificially fast play the balls. But my major argument against Johns was his lack of durability, as I said. I don't think he ever played a full season.
Comment
-
Originally posted by knightsfan94 View PostNewcastle should of won the 02 Grand final if it wasn't for Johns getting injured in the qualifying final.
You cannot suggest that any side "should" win a Premiership based on an incident four weeks out from the Grand Final.FONK
Comment
Comment