Phil Rothfield loves Rugby League…

[Guest]

He loves it so much the red-cheeked alcho cannot wait to tear the game apart.

He’s got 3 stories in the daily telucrap about the betting scandal all laced with “GAME IN CRISIS” “CYCLONE SAVES GAME FROM FRONT PAGE”. The moronic farkwit even places the blame for how long it’s taken to get to this stage at the feet of the NRL –

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1225999061253

“In the months since, the NRL has been widely criticised for taking too long to come up with any new developments on this case.”

Has anyone told this brain dead idiot that it was the police investigating not the NRL? We don’t hear shit from this clown until there’s an opportunity to rip into the game then he crawls out from under Hartigan’s desk, wipes his mouth and leaps into action.

I thought Frilingos was bad, but compared to this brain dead moron, Chippy was brilliant. Honestly ToK, this bloke is an embarrassment to everyone in your company. He must suck cock really well.

Chook.

[Guest]

Why do people read that rag. I have not bought a single edition or read it on or off line since the Super League war.

[Guest]

Just a disgruntled Sharks fan.

[Guest]

I agree with Sootster. Phil ticks me off also, but I think to myself how hard it is being a Sharkies fan. If I was a Sharkies fan it would make me bitter & twisted also. I choose not to read anything coming from him anyway. I am sure his attitude will change if/when the team starts winning again and if/when that big development for Shark park goes through. The guy has never experienced a premiership win and the team's finance's are constantly on the brink. Imagine what that would do to you as a fan. It would be very tough to stay enthusiastic about the game for so long.

[Guest]

Why do people read that rag. I have not bought a single edition or read it on or off line since the Super League war.

We all read it for our footy news, well all except you.

Chook.

[Guest]

We all read it for our footy news, well all except you.

Chook.

I don't buy that crap either. The only time I do is when the kids get their footy cards. Just a waste of paper, SMH is the go if you want facts, not beat up sensationalized journo crap.

[Guest]

We all read it for our footy news, well all except you.

Chook.

Well if you want to read stories that get your blood pressure up and are anti our team most of the time (how many posts have been written here claiming the stories to be false and biased?), that is your choice. I use different sources for my footy news.

[Guest]

I don't buy that crap either. The only time I do is when the kids get their footy cards. Just a waste of paper, SMH is the go if you want facts, not beat up sensationalized journo crap.

Not so. It makes a great bottom of the bird cage liner.

[Guest]

Well if you want to read stories that get your blood pressure up and are anti our team most of the time (how many posts have been written here claiming the stories to be false and biased?), that is your choice. I use different sources for my footy news.

absolutely right, the anti Roosters bias is just so obvious

it can be quite upsetting on occasions

[Headless Chook]

I don't buy that crap either. The only time I do is when the kids get their footy cards. Just a waste of paper, SMH is the go if you want facts, not beat up sensationalized journo crap.

SMH are just as culpable when it comes to printing bullshit as what the DT are. They do after all, have Danny Weidler on their books, and the way they kow tow to Mundine and his cronies is downright embarrassing.

If you want facts, I suggest you read both papers, divide by 2, take away a 1000 and that should get you close to the sum total of facts in both papers.

[Guest]

SMH are just as culpable when it comes to printing bullshit as what the DT are. They do after all, have Danny Weidler on their books, and the way they kow tow to Mundine and his cronies is downright embarrassing.

If you want facts, I suggest you read both papers, divide by 2, take away a 1000 and that should get you close to the sum total of facts in both papers.

Very true. In fact half the articles you read in either the Daily Telucrap or the SMH are verbatim apart from author, font size and style.

The biggest difference in regards to the reporting of this betting scandal is that Phil Afterbirthhead is using it to tear into game again.

Chook.

[Guest]

I tend to agree that most stories are baseless and misleading.... but by God i need to get my footy fix from anywhere I can get it. I know its not always good for me but the compulsion to find anything Rooster related is stronger than me.

I've exhausted my stocks of recorded games, bought the summer edition of RLW and still trawl through the print media looking for footy stuff.

Sad, I know. Bring on the Trials

[Kingbilly]

facts and newspapers.
Not 2 words that go hand in hand if you as me.

[Guest]

I've actually heard that Phil Rothfield loves the cocks.

But I've never seen him at the club or at the SFS.

[OMR]

Let us all send in letters to the editor every time this farkwit writes an article that is lacking in fact and full of BS .It'l keep us busy all winter.