Issac Luke the CAT!

[supermario]

You were the one questioning our memory of fighting for a finals spot. I would wager that I've seen my team play in more semi finals and gradn finals than you ever have.

I would put the Whole GDP of Australia, America and the UK combined on the odds that you have seen the Roosters in grand finals more times than Darkyboy has !

[Guest]

how did souths go in 2000 & 2001 dork.

[Guest]

Yeh true the bloke who got hit in the head in our semi-final last year with seconds to go against the Tigers who could of layed down and got a penalty but didn't draws so many comparisons to Isaac Luke the bloke who copped a love tap and went down like he had been shot.

It's good to see that Souffs fans are just as insecure as always coming to see what we thought.

Is the fact that Thurston called it a "love tap" an indication he like his sex rough?

[bondi-boy]

Tallis just said on Fox...[on the replay of the Sunday night show]...after the Luke tackle/hit was replayed...that he would've stayed down, as Souths' season was on the line.

[Guest]

wt* are you talking about? He played the rules as stated by PIM. The shot was high but the fact he catted the way he did is just dirty.

I thought it was obvious but I'll explain it for you.

Replace Souths with the Roosters, and Luke with Friend. You wouldn't be so concerned if it was Friend who stayed down to get the penalty.

[Guest]

I thought it was obvious but I'll explain it for you.

Replace Souths with the Roosters, and Luke with Friend. You wouldn't be so concerned if it was Friend who stayed down to get the penalty.

Righteous outrage in life only applies to the deeds of others not yours or those close to you. I thought you would've understood that

[Guest]

Tallis just said on Fox...[on the replay of the Sunday night show]...after the Luke tackle/hit was replayed...that he would've stayed down, as Souths' season was on the line.

I agree with him, problem is the on field refs saw no problems. The hit went on report which was the biggest joke.

[supermario]

I agree with him, problem is the on field refs saw no problems. The hit went on report which was the biggest joke.

Apparently the ruling is, the video ref can only intervien if the high shot warrants a player to be placed on report. that will probably need clarification though

[Guest]

Apparently the ruling is, the video ref can only intervien if the high shot warrants a player to be placed on report. that will probably need clarification though

No clarification required - you have hit the nail on the head. The rule was brought in to ensure only the most serious offences benefit from a player lieing down - instead now the refs call a minor high contact and put it on report to get around the rule.

[Guest]

TBH i dont mind Luke as a player, he did what he had to do and won the game for Souffs.
Darque, at least we have made the GF 5 of the last 11, when was the last time you guys did?
You may say we only won 1 "however it's nice to be competing for it and not trying to avoid spoons, not that you'd know."

[Rooster_6]

No clarification required - you have hit the nail on the head. The rule was brought in to ensure only the most serious offences benefit from a player lieing down - instead now the refs call a minor high contact and put it on report to get around the rule.

Wrong again, it wasn't even put on report, they totally disregarded the rule.