Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Since when was SFS the Tigers home Ground?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    The Tigers play as many games at the SFS nowdays as they do Leichhardt and Campbelltown, so it is just as much one of their home grounds as the other 2.

    I don't blame Sheens for being cranky about being shafted to ANZ, which is a shit of a ground and also gives the Drag Queens a level playing field.

    NC
    Supporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by novice chook View Post
      The Tigers play as many games at the SFS nowdays as they do Leichhardt and Campbelltown, so it is just as much one of their home grounds as the other 2.

      I don't blame Sheens for being cranky about being shafted to ANZ, which is a shit of a ground and also gives the Drag Queens a level playing field.

      NC
      Your right, they played 4 games each at those grounds this year when being the home side.
      So why when SFS is our home ground also do we have to play them at Leichardt? They put in there requests to the NRL and i bet that was 1 of them.
      There the only side to have 3 home grounds, and like i wrote before Sheens suggests they got shafted last year because they played at our home ground week 1 of finals? but hang on tim you just said its your home ground to?
      Whingers, im glad he has been so called shafted.

      Comment


      • #18
        Fox, the Tigers had every right to play that finals game at Leicchardt or Campbelltown last year under the old rules but didn't - they agreed to play the game at the SFS so more fans could attend. It certainly wasn't a decision that favoured the Tigers and maybe Sheens thinks that after they did the right thing by the NRL last year, the Tigers deserved a little charity in return this year.

        I don't blame the Tigers for being peed off with being shunted to ANZ to play the Drag Queens.


        NC
        Supporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by novice chook View Post
          Fox, the Tigers had every right to play that finals game at Leicchardt or Campbelltown last year under the old rules but didn't - they agreed to play the game at the SFS so more fans could attend. It certainly wasn't a decision that favoured the Tigers and maybe Sheens thinks that after they did the right thing by the NRL last year, the Tigers deserved a little charity in return this year.

          I don't blame the Tigers for being peed off with being shunted to ANZ to play the Drag Queens.


          NC
          I blame the Tigers, there the ones who signed off on the finals being played at bigger venues, obviously they didnt think they'd play the Dragons week 1 and hence more games during the year being played at the SFS to give them an edge in Finals whether they finish top 4 or not.

          The NRL owe the Tigers nothing at all and i hope the Drag Queens kick there ass, am i getting the feeling ur a closet Tigers fan?
          Like i said who else has 3 home grounds, they get more then enough help.

          Comment


          • #20
            Wests v St.George should definitely be played at the SFS IMO...

            It is meant to be Wests home advantage and the SFS qualifies as a finals location.

            I think it is absolute madness. Imagine a heaving SFS compared to a hollow Homebush experience.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Pass the Ball View Post
              Wests v St.George should definitely be played at the SFS IMO...

              It is meant to be Wests home advantage and the SFS qualifies as a finals location.

              I think it is absolute madness. Imagine a heaving SFS compared to a hollow Homebush experience.
              I agree with u, but they should play at Leichardt and Manly at Brookvale, but these teams made there bed when they signed off on playing at bigger venues, and obvioulsy this game will attract more then 44000 people, thats why its at ANZ.
              The Tigers should never have a home game at SFS, we play 12 games a year there or 11 if u take out the NZ game, why do they get to benefit from 3 home grounds.

              Comment


              • #22
                I can see no benefit by whoring yourself out to 3 different grounds except for financial benefit.

                If we had of come in 4th, would we have to play St.George out at homebush or at home? Absolutely preposterous if we had to go to Homebush.....

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by The Fox View Post
                  getting the feeling ur a closet Tigers fan?
                  Like i said who else has 3 home grounds, they get more then enough help.
                  No closet Tigers fan, although I would much prefer them to the Drag Queens, whom I despise.

                  I'm sure Roosters fans wouldn't be happy if it was us being shifted from the SFS to ANZ to suit the NRL and the other clubs involved in a finals series. And don't think that couldn't happen.

                  NC
                  Supporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Fark off tigers!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by The Fox View Post
                      I agree with u, but they should play at Leichardt and Manly at Brookvale, but these teams made there bed when they signed off on playing at bigger venues, and obvioulsy this game will attract more then 44000 people, thats why its at ANZ.
                      The Tigers should never have a home game at SFS, we play 12 games a year there or 11 if u take out the NZ game, why do they get to benefit from 3 home grounds.
                      It was moreso an NRL directive. If the Tigers were against it, they would have had little choice but to agree.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Dubai View Post
                        It was moreso an NRL directive. If the Tigers were against it, they would have had little choice but to agree.
                        If the Tigers were against it we'd be reading that they were 1 of the clubs that were against it.
                        If it were the Roosters Vs Dragons it would be at the SFS because week 1 we wouldnt get over 40000 people at the game.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by novice chook View Post
                          No closet Tigers fan, although I would much prefer them to the Drag Queens, whom I despise.

                          I'm sure Roosters fans wouldn't be happy if it was us being shifted from the SFS to ANZ to suit the NRL and the other clubs involved in a finals series. And don't think that couldn't happen.

                          NC
                          All in all it should be changed to Week 1 you get home ground advantage, otherwise theres no advantage for finishing in the top 4 then maybe getting a second chance if u lose.
                          The Tigers should stay at Leichardt and Campbelltown and stay away from the SFS theres no affiliation for them there what so ever.
                          The only team that has a right there is Souths and they left due to a better deal with ANZ.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            40k at the SFS > 50k at ANZ anyway

                            So what a few more bandwagoners get to see their team.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by The Fox View Post
                              I agree with u, but they should play at Leichardt and Manly at Brookvale, but these teams made there bed when they signed off on playing at bigger venues, and obvioulsy this game will attract more then 44000 people, thats why its at ANZ.
                              The Tigers should never have a home game at SFS, we play 12 games a year there or 11 if u take out the NZ game, why do they get to benefit from 3 home grounds.
                              Because they seem to be the NRL's pets.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by roosterman 02-forever View Post
                                fark off tigers!
                                yesss!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X