Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The MRC, TV ratings and the fair dinkum scale.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I don't mind Latrell Mitchell myself even if he does play for another team - He was a big part of the two premierships in 2018 and 2019

    The same as Freddie Freeman who also plays for another team now in MLB . He played a big part in the 6 Division Titles and World Series win in his 12 years at the Atlanta Braves

    Comment


    • #17
      The putrid dog has a history of dog shots. He must spend time on the sidelines.

      Comment


      • #18
        It was stupid and he should be made to sit in the naughty corner all week, or make him follow Luke Coombes around the country skoaling beers.

        Seriously, ir was dumb with a capital D but wouldn't have bruised a grape, I'm tipping he won't miss any games

        Comment


        • #19
          Did he hurt Tyson.. no he didn't. Did he mean to hurt Tyson... yes he did ,you can see him cocking his elbow and going for the back of his head. This is a litmus test for me on the MRC and Judiciary. To intentionally attack the head of an opponent deserves citing and time on the sidelines.. no matter who the player is. LM did not get him flush so does that let him off? I do not see how an accidental head contact (high tackle) can get time on the sidelines and an intentional contact does not.
          For mine if he get off this it clearly shows that there is no integrity in the process and the fix is on.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Jacks Fur Coat View Post
            I think I'd rather he played, been a dead weight for them lately.
            Absolutely. He could dead set be the reason we win in round 27.
            FVCK CANCER

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by King Salvo View Post
              I don't mind Latrell Mitchell myself even if he does play for another team - He was a big part of the two premierships in 2018 and 2019

              The same as Freddie Freeman who also plays for another team now in MLB . He played a big part in the 6 Division Titles and World Series win in his 12 years at the Atlanta Braves
              You started out well with your first comment but your second paragraph fell into a huge pile of shyt.
              FVCK CANCER

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Renman View Post
                Did he hurt Tyson.. no he didn't. Did he mean to hurt Tyson... yes he did ,you can see him cocking his elbow and going for the back of his head. This is a litmus test for me on the MRC and Judiciary. To intentionally attack the head of an opponent deserves citing and time on the sidelines.. no matter who the player is. LM did not get him flush so does that let him off? I do not see how an accidental head contact (high tackle) can get time on the sidelines and an intentional contact does not.
                For mine if he get off this it clearly shows that there is no integrity in the process and the fix is on.
                I love your avatar.
                FVCK CANCER

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Renman View Post
                  Did he hurt Tyson.. no he didn't. Did he mean to hurt Tyson... yes he did ,you can see him cocking his elbow and going for the back of his head. This is a litmus test for me on the MRC and Judiciary. To intentionally attack the head of an opponent deserves citing and time on the sidelines.. no matter who the player is. LM did not get him flush so does that let him off? I do not see how an accidental head contact (high tackle) can get time on the sidelines and an intentional contact does not.
                  For mine if he get off this it clearly shows that there is no integrity in the process and the fix is on.
                  If it was any other player I'd be confident he'd cop a week. But there is no doubt they want the media darling and great hope to play against us for the ratings. There was intent in what he did. As you said, no it didn't hurt Frizell but he was trying to. It was completely unnecessary foul play.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post

                    I love your avatar.
                    What Avatar? It's a selfie!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by rented tracksuit View Post

                      You started out well with your first comment but your second paragraph fell into a huge pile of shyt.
                      Got it in one.
                      1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
                      1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Latrell Mitchell charged and facing a week.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Dangerous contact grade 2....downgrade incoming.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Renman View Post

                            What Avatar? It's a selfie!
                            I think I love you.
                            FVCK CANCER

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Interesting when watching the highlights to see that Latrell and Frizell had a coming together late in the first half. It speaks to intent on Latrell's later actions.

                              Also interesting is how few times Latrell is in frame when the Knights score a try. His defensive positioning is atrocious at times.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Waylander View Post
                                Interesting when watching the highlights to see that Latrell and Frizell had a coming together late in the first half. It speaks to intent on Latrell's later actions.

                                Also interesting is how few times Latrell is in frame when the Knights score a try. His defensive positioning is atrocious at times.
                                He's not giving 100%. He wants more money!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X