Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sitili

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    It's the lesser of two evils !


    Pick one = Angus or Sitili ?


    Even if Angus was in shithouse form, I think we'd all be leaning towards him anyways. Since Sitili did his ACL and then there was some complications with a neck disc bulge (I think) ... he hasn't appeared to be confident in his game. Also, if the reported salary he's on ($650k) is true then yeah that's way too much for a player to be playing reggies and behind others in the pecking order.


    He's served us well since 2018 and had some good moments but it's probably best for his career that he finds a new club that will give him the required game time (as long as he doesn't go to Souths !).

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Inflictor View Post
      I hope we do a swap this year for Fifita if we have the money for the difference and Sitili is happy to move to that dump of a state. Gives the Titans first and only crack at Sitili.
      Could you imagine the uproar haha
      Red, White and Bluesters!!!

      Comment


      • #18
        Sit still will be staying due to the Fifita backflip.




        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Easts75 View Post
          Can't we fark that grape Nat Butcher off instead
          I was wondering if Nat brushed you at a fan day or took your car parking spot at a shopping centre, as you sure bang on Les Miser style with your dislike of Nat.

          Nat is a very good player. All teams need a player like Nat who can play 80 minutes each week. He saved 2 or 3 tries in D vs. the Warriors, but you obviously missed that.

          When the Roosters signed Nat old Souths were that mad they banned Roosters Junior sides from playing in the combined Roosters/Souths Junior Comp.

          It was well documented at the time a fed-up Souths booted the four Roosters junior clubs out of their competition at the end of 2016 after they broke a gentleman’s agreement and signed Butcher.

          Souths Sydney Junior Rugby League CEO Luke Curry maintained on Thursday there had been a few little issues brewing between the two districts, but Butcher’s signature “was the final straw”.




          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Kelby View Post
            Sit still will be staying due to the Fifita backflip.




            Wong is already ahead of him. He would be silly to stay even if Angus goes.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Easts75 View Post
              Can't we fark that grape Nat Butcher off instead
              He’s got those photos of Robbo so no chance.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by King Salvo View Post

                I was wondering if Nat brushed you at a fan day or took your car parking spot at a shopping centre, as you sure bang on Les Miser style with your dislike of Nat.

                Nat is a very good player. All teams need a player like Nat who can play 80 minutes each week. He saved 2 or 3 tries in D vs. the Warriors, but you obviously missed that.

                When the Roosters signed Nat old Souths were that mad they banned Roosters Junior sides from playing in the combined Roosters/Souths Junior Comp.

                It was well documented at the time a fed-up Souths booted the four Roosters junior clubs out of their competition at the end of 2016 after they broke a gentleman’s agreement and signed Butcher.

                Souths Sydney Junior Rugby League CEO Luke Curry maintained on Thursday there had been a few little issues brewing between the two districts, but Butcher’s signature “was the final straw”.



                Well said Salvo. He is a very under appreciated player. Teams need players with a high work rate just as much as they need the X factor type game breakers.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by dice View Post


                  Wong is already ahead of him. He would be silly to stay even if Angus goes.
                  won't have a choice if we want him to stay

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Stili sadly has reached his potential. Nice guy but honesty isn’t anyones starting team or is an effective sub

                    i wish him the best

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by King Salvo View Post

                      I was wondering if Nat brushed you at a fan day or took your car parking spot at a shopping centre, as you sure bang on Les Miser style with your dislike of Nat.

                      Nat is a very good player. All teams need a player like Nat who can play 80 minutes each week. He saved 2 or 3 tries in D vs. the Warriors, but you obviously missed that.

                      When the Roosters signed Nat old Souths were that mad they banned Roosters Junior sides from playing in the combined Roosters/Souths Junior Comp.

                      It was well documented at the time a fed-up Souths booted the four Roosters junior clubs out of their competition at the end of 2016 after they broke a gentleman’s agreement and signed Butcher.

                      Souths Sydney Junior Rugby League CEO Luke Curry maintained on Thursday there had been a few little issues brewing between the two districts, but Butcher’s signature “was the final straw”.



                      Hear hear.

                      greatly put love butcher. Even though he doesn’t set the world alight hes an important cog

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by zac View Post

                        won't have a choice if we want him to stay
                        Even though we gave him permission to field offers from other clubs?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by milanja View Post

                          Even though we gave him permission to field offers from other clubs?
                          you'd figure. no way was he contract ripped up - sitili certainly wouldn't have wanted that

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Robbo mentioned the sitili part where he could look elsewhere for next year was false tonight

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Chook2 View Post
                              Robbo mentioned the sitili part where he could look elsewhere for next year was false tonight
                              Yes I just saw that presser. Good to hear.
                              Red, White and Bluesters!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X