Sorry for the double vision (could fix it but have put that in my too hard basket for doing on my mobile phone this morning).
In short I think the tackle is unconventional as opposed to being a shoulder charge (as they claim) or a swinging arm to the head. His chest MIGHT make some contact with the head at some point (MIGHT) but that's not how the tackle made contact:
- He came in with a low arm that's undisputedly below the head.
- His other arm stays by his side the whole time and he does NOT point a shoulder out towards Walsh's head.
- Walsh was not knocked out as he passed his HIA.
- At worst there is contact between old mate Jo's chest and Reecie Booooi's head. I don't think this is a penalty so long as there's no swinging arm, there's a valid attempt to wrap an arm around him to impact the tackle and it isn't a shoulder charge.
Worth challenging IMO.
In short I think the tackle is unconventional as opposed to being a shoulder charge (as they claim) or a swinging arm to the head. His chest MIGHT make some contact with the head at some point (MIGHT) but that's not how the tackle made contact:
- He came in with a low arm that's undisputedly below the head.
- His other arm stays by his side the whole time and he does NOT point a shoulder out towards Walsh's head.
- Walsh was not knocked out as he passed his HIA.
- At worst there is contact between old mate Jo's chest and Reecie Booooi's head. I don't think this is a penalty so long as there's no swinging arm, there's a valid attempt to wrap an arm around him to impact the tackle and it isn't a shoulder charge.
Worth challenging IMO.
Comment