Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suaalii loaned back to rugby league in 2026.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Suaalii loaned back to rugby league in 2026.


    Rugby considered unique loan deal for Suaalii to play NRL in season 2026
    Story by Michael Chammas
    • 1h • 3 min read
    The Sydney Roosters and Rugby Australia held recent talks about a unique deal that would have seen Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii loaned back to rugby league in 2026.

    The high-level discussions between senior officials at the NRL glamour club and Rugby Australia chief executive Phil Waugh took place last month.

    Suaalii is contracted to Rugby Australia until after the 2027 World Cup – and potentially for a further two years if he takes up a $4 million player option in his favour for seasons 2028 and 2029 – but sources talking anonymously to protect confidentiality said the 21-year-old was recently the subject of talks between his current and former employers over a cross-code sabbatical.

    While it is not unusual for rugby players to be granted sabbaticals to play Japanese or French rugby, RA considered the unprecedented idea of loaning its star signing to a rival code in a deal that would have seen Suaalii playing for the Roosters in between the marquee years of a 2025 British and Irish Lions tour and a home Rugby World Cup in 2027.

    Waugh told the Herald he was approached by the Roosters about the idea, but that it didn’t go much further. The Roosters declined to comment. Suaalii’s manager Isaac Moses did not respond to attempts to contact him.
    Waugh confirmed he had given brief consideration to an arrangement that could have seen Suaalii’s monster five-year, $8.5 million deal partly financed by a rival code.

    However, the talks fell over when the Roosters learnt that Suaalii had a two-year player option in his favour for 2028 and 2029 to remain in the 15-a-side code for almost $2 million a season.

    The Roosters paid Suaalii close to $800,000 in 2024 and would not have been willing to pay him much more if he was to return to the sport.

    RA was equally reluctant to tip in a large amount of Suaalii’s contract for him to play another sport and the two parties agreed to end the conversation. RA remains open to the idea of Suaalii serving a sabbatical playing rugby overseas despite it having no contractual arrangements to do so.

    RA currently owns the Waratahs, the team Suaalii will play for in the Super Rugby competition next year. A deal with an overseas rugby club could alleviate the financial toll Suaalii’s salary might have on the sport’s bottom line, especially with an $80 million loan hanging over its head.
    Sydney Roosters billionaire chairman Nick Politis was last year quoted as saying that Suaalii was “always a Rooster”, despite him inking a deal with the Wallabies.

    “Joseph is a good guy, a good kid,” Politis told Channel Nine last year. “It’s sad that we’ve lost him to union, but he tells us he’s coming back in 2028.”
    The Roosters are now privately resigned to Suaalii not playing in the NRL until at least 2030, when he will be 26 years old coming into the season.

    While Waugh was coy on his conversations with the Roosters, he admitted rugby league wasn’t the enemy.

    “We need to co-exist with rugby league,” he said. “I’m less concerned about girls or boys playing league and AFL - as long as they are experiencing rugby. You’re not going to get me going head-to-head with Roosters and I think we can co-exist successfully and have done since rugby league was started.”

  • #2
    > ... sources talking anonymously to protect confidentiality said the 21-year-old was recently the subject of talks between his current and former employers over a cross-code sabbatical...

    > ... Waugh told the Herald he was approached by the Roosters about the idea, but that it didn’t go much further...

    Great bit of journalism there Chammas.

    > The Roosters paid Suaalii close to $800,000 in 2024 and would not have been willing to pay him much more if he was to return to the sport.

    Daaaaamn... we paid massive overs then!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by ism22 View Post
      > ... sources talking anonymously to protect confidentiality said the 21-year-old was recently the subject of talks between his current and former employers over a cross-code sabbatical...

      > ... Waugh told the Herald he was approached by the Roosters about the idea, but that it didn’t go much further...

      Great bit of journalism there Chammas.

      > The Roosters paid Suaalii close to $800,000 in 2024 and would not have been willing to pay him much more if he was to return to the sport.

      Daaaaamn... we paid massive overs then!
      By my understanding his 4 year contract which he signed when he was 17 was the one he was on, and it was back loaded

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by FlamingRooster View Post

        By my understanding his 4 year contract which he signed when he was 17 was the one he was on, and it was back loaded
        Would've had performance clauses inserted too like making origin, reaching a certain amount of games etc.

        800k seems like a lot but wouldn't have been surprising had he been around the 600-700k mark

        Comment


        • #5
          So he might be available for 2030. He won’t be much good then given he won’t have made a tackle in five years.
          Interesting that he didn’t tell the Roosters about his two year option. This is one of the rare occasions where Nick has been dudded.
          Let’s move on from this mercenary.

          Comment


          • #6
            4 Years at the Roosters - 3 million
            5 Years playing Rugby if he takes up the 2 x 1 year options - 9 Million

            12 Million for 9 years.

            26 if he returns to League which is a big question mark when you think of the money could make playing Rugby Overseas. RA don't have the same rule as NZ Rugby that a player is only available for All Black Selection if they are playing domestic Rugby in New Zealand and or one of the NZ Super Rugby Teams.

            Giteau's law - Criteria for Wallaby selection for Australian players playing overseas - minimum 30 test caps and or 5 seasons at Super Rugby level - 3 overseas players can be selected per tournament /series

            Comment


            • #7
              I don’t want suaalii or Manu back if they keep switching back and forth, what kind of stability it that?

              first time in a while our club seems desperate.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by milanja View Post
                I don’t want suaalii or Manu back if they keep switching back and forth, what kind of stability it that?

                first time in a while our club seems desperate.
                I agree 100%. You are either committed to the club or you aren't. These 2 clearly weren't based on on field (Manu) and off field (Suaalii) actions.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Rooster_Mark View Post

                  I agree 100%. You are either committed to the club or you aren't. These 2 clearly weren't based on on field (Manu) and off field (Suaalii) actions.
                  Both of these guys will soon be overtaken, either by young blokes coming through or an astute purchase, then forgotten.
                  Suaalli = all effort with a bit of skill.
                  Manu = little effort with great skill.
                  Neither are the complete package.
                  I hate to say this, but at Easts, Latrell was better than both of them by a country mile.
                  We move on.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by milanja View Post
                    I don’t want suaalii or Manu back if they keep switching back and forth, what kind of stability it that?

                    first time in a while our club seems desperate.
                    Agree wholeheartedly. There's a handful of NRL players that you'd welcome back. JS and JM aren't on that list imo especially if they want $800k plus a season. Both are replaceable!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bates View Post

                      Agree wholeheartedly. There's a handful of NRL players that you'd welcome back. JS and JM aren't on that list imo especially if they want $800k plus a season. Both are replaceable!
                      Don’t get me wrong, I could welcome either back, but only if it’s on a fixed 2-3 year contract, not half a season on and off.

                      what I don’t understand with the Manu deal of potentially coming back halfway through the year is, if our centers are playing well, does Manu just take one of their spots automatically? I know we don’t have the best luck with injuries, but you can’t set aside 500k for a player who may have to force his way back into the side.

                      We’ll see what pans out, but 2025 is looking like a very odd season at the moment.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Steggles View Post

                        Both of these guys will soon be overtaken, either by young blokes coming through or an astute purchase, then forgotten.
                        Suaalli = all effort with a bit of skill.
                        Manu = little effort with great skill.
                        Neither are the complete package.
                        I hate to say this, but at Easts, Latrell was better than both of them by a country mile.
                        We move on.
                        Couldn’t agree more
                        suaali tries hard but at times you wish he would loosen up and play abit more attacking footy
                        Manu is crazy skilful but lacked interest unless playing fullback
                        Mitchell is a better centre then both

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Love Su but he can’t come and go as he pleases. He’s either in or he’s not.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Wow I thought the circus was over..

                            As good as both are individually,I’m happy to move on from them and focus on players dedicated to the Club!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Thirteen View Post
                              Love Su but he can’t come and go as he pleases. He’s either in or he’s not.
                              How was the Cricket?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X