Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ted talks: Sydney Roosters' top priority after exodus

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ted talks: Sydney Roosters' top priority after exodus

    I'm very pleased to see that there is an acknowledgement that our defence needed to be prioritised. From msn,com (Ted talks: Sydney Roosters' top priority after exodus)


    James Tedesco has vowed to ensure the Sydney Roosters put an emphasis back on defence, labelling it more important than overcoming any attacking impacts of the club's player drain.

    The Roosters face the biggest challenge of any of last year's top-eight teams in 2025, losing a combined 1279 games in experience at the end of the 2024 season.

    Most of those have been in key attacking positions, with five-eighth Luke Keary and centres Joey Manu and Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii all gone.

    Halfback Sam Walker and hooker Brandon Smith will also miss the first third of the season, after suffering ACL ruptures in the same game late last year.

    That leaves Roosters captain Tedesco as the last man standing from their first-choice 2024 spine.

    Regardless, Tedesco is adamant the Roosters' attacking structures do not need to change.

    Instead, it is defence that has been a bigger focus in the summer.

    "We scored a lot of points last year, I think we scored the most tries, but our defence wasn't up to standard," Tedesco told AAP.

    "That's how we win big games.

    "The main focus for us has been the defence, getting that right, and then our attack can build off the back of it.

    "That structure doesn't need to change either. A couple of guys are learning the system a bit.

    "But it is more (about) getting more steely on our line and not leaking as many points, and then letting our attack come good at the end of the year."

    Tedesco hailed the impact of Chad Townsend as an experienced voice in the halves, likely to partner Sandon Smith at the start of the season.

    He also believes Robert Toia can be an out-and-out star at the club for several seasons, with the 20-year-old to get his chance at centre after back-to-back ACL ruptures.

    The Roosters had their best attacking year of any of their 12 seasons under Trent Robinson in 2024, ranking first in the NRL with 30.75 points per game on their way to a preliminary final.

    But their defence is a long way from what it was when the Tri-colours were top-two regulars between 2013 and 2019.

    The club have conceded more than 400 points in each of the past four seasons, after only doing so twice in Robinson's first seven years at the club.

    That has shown to be more problematic against fellow front-runners Penrith and Melbourne, who the Roosters have leaked 28 points per game to since 2020.

    "You look at the premierships in 2013, 2018 and 2019, our attack wasn't the greatest at the start of it and it got better in the middle," Tedesco said.

    "But the defence has to be on from the start.

    "That progress has been our main focus. Obviously we are working on combinations in attack, but it's not our sole focus."


  • #2
    In fairness Robbo and Teddy spoke about needing to improve their defence after most press conferences last season and we saw little improvement. In this case I would say “ actions speak louder than words “

    Comment


    • #3
      Be nice if there is an emphasis on holding the ball... just sayin

      Comment


      • #4
        I automatically assumed the Ted Talk was Robbo talking about locking in, playing Roosters footy and that there is a deeper meaning behind how we play footy like he usually does... let's not forget... "we're ready to go".

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Random Rooster View Post
          Be nice if there is an emphasis on holding the ball... just sayin
          Need to be careful with how far we go with this kind of thinking, one of our strengths during Robinson's era has been our attack.

          We had one of the best all time attacks last year and I would say over the last 15yrs we've comfortably been the best attacking side in the comp.

          Making safe football a priority is a sure fire way to make your attack less effective.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

            Need to be careful with how far we go with this kind of thinking, one of our strengths during Robinson's era has been our attack.

            We had one of the best all time attacks last year and I would say over the last 15yrs we've comfortably been the best attacking side in the comp.

            Making safe football a priority is a sure fire way to make your attack less effective.
            I actually completely agree with this. Our seasons of success under Robbo weren't focused around ball security. In fact we made a heap of errors but the trade off was we had an amazing and unpredictable attack when it all clicked.

            The major difference has been our inability to defend our errors like we used to. Probably because of the 6 again rule compounding errors in a teams own half.

            Comment


            • #7
              Well, considering the strike we’ve lost it’s not a bad idea to scrap the attacking flair gameplan and focus on the hard stuff.

              I remember a few years ago we also came out saying similar stuff and our D wasn’t all that great, so it is one thing saying it and then another thing coming out and putting it to work.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ChookMaster View Post
                Well, considering the strike we’ve lost it’s not a bad idea to scrap the attacking flair gameplan and focus on the hard stuff.

                I remember a few years ago we also came out saying similar stuff and our D wasn’t all that great, so it is one thing saying it and then another thing coming out and putting it to work.
                Weaker sides who have based their game on defence and completion rate alone have faired terribly in the modern day game, I think that is bad advice.

                I think the difference this year with our defence is there's no out for the players. It's only human nature that with the freedom of which we scored points at last year there was probably less desire for the commitment that great defence requires.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Bring back Fitzy.

                  BTW is it true that Boyd's early coaching career is red hot? The man of few words could be the future.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The best defensive team over the full year is going to be the Premiers or runners up which I can live with.
                    If your defence is the best or second best in the comp your attack will have enough in it to win games because youre the best defensive team.
                    Winning the comp with attack can only be done on being 1 of the 2 best defensive teams.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

                      Need to be careful with how far we go with this kind of thinking, one of our strengths during Robinson's era has been our attack.

                      We had one of the best all time attacks last year and I would say over the last 15yrs we've comfortably been the best attacking side in the comp.

                      Making safe football a priority is a sure fire way to make your attack less effective.
                      I think a problem with V'landys-style 'speed' footy is that you get punished more regularly/harshly for making mistakes. Thus I can see why somebody would say 'oh just hold onto the ball and be safe'.

                      However, last year our attack was amongst the best in the comp because we were adventurous. IMO there's a fine balance between playing enterprising footy (which involves taking calculated risks) and not doing stupid shyte.

                      My preference is that we roll the dice when we have numbers (or in an attempt to bread a deadlock where we're behind + pinned against the ropes so need something special) rather than playing 80's style 'run hard and keep it in the bread basket, son' kinda footy.

                      If Cleary's pinning you with his long kicking game and your forwards are losing their legs then you've gotta try SOMETHING. Unless you're Souffs. Then I'm happy for you to just hold onto the pill and get a cricket score put on you. IMO we're better than that though...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I recently watched some semi football from 20 years ago during the Stuart and Murray era. Those games were fast. So V’Landys speed game is absolute bullshit. The tampering of the rules pre season and during a season undoubtedly was a quota requirement within Engineer V’Landys agreements with gambling agencies and media.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X