The unwanted,smelly, underprivileged cousin moving in?

[Jacks Fur Coat]

I thought this was a thread about Jism

I must admit I did too, initially.

[roostermcgregor]

The software bloke and Crowe need to pay for scaffolding at Heffron and Redfern oval, so Souffs can play home games at both venues.
That way , their fans can get good vantage places when watching their games.

[The Brain]

just put Ratsak around the stadium and deodorant as well.

[horrie hastings]

The playing surface is hardly holding up at the moment with the Roosters, Waratahs and Sydney FC playing on it so imagine letting the Myxo/Methos play on it, the ground couldn't cope with 4 tenants sharing the pitch early in the season

[BondiBob]

They're not our cousin.

Souffs are scum of the earth!

Really it is the supporters that are punishing always full of excuses just crap

[Mickie Lane]

Allianz Stadium is owned by the Government so at the end of the day any club can play there.
The Roosters dont own it.

[Random Rooster]

Allianz Stadium is owned by the Government so at the end of the day any club can play there.
The Roosters dont own it.

True but i just think every team should play the majority of their homes games in the area they represent. Souths would get a full house every home game at Redfern Oval with the new capacity of 5000

[bondi.boy]

Allianz Stadium is owned by the Government so at the end of the day any club can play there.
The Roosters dont own it.

The Roosters have a contract with clauses.

[Arties Pie]

I know I will be in the minority here but personally I don’t particularly care one way or another, I used to love the old SFS home game of Roosters v Souths, Home game for us and we would be in the Members and vice versa when it was our away game, Half the time we all ended up in the Members anyway.
t was always good banter and rivalry

[SupermanSupportsEasts4Eva]

IMO the only place souffs should be allowed to play is in Perth. The further away the better.

[The Lip]

I know I will be in the minority here but personally I don’t particularly care one way or another, I used to love the old SFS home game of Roosters v Souths, Home game for us and we would be in the Members and vice versa when it was our away game, Half the time we all ended up in the Members anyway.
t was always good banter and rivalry

Agree I couldn’t care less - if all the teams contracted including the Vermin scum played in one week it would be 4 games a week - shit we used to have 3 in one day.

That would rarely happen rarely be lucky to average out at twice a week. I’d love to have extra games there to go to and vehemently support whomever souffs were playing.

[Jacks Fur Coat]

I think its outrageous that the idea of us sharing our spiritual home with the arch enemy is even mentioned. It makes a nonsense of tribalism in the game, which is what the competition was built on. Next we'll be picking composite teams and lending players to and fro.

[SamKerrSimp]

I know I will be in the minority here but personally I don’t particularly care one way or another, I used to love the old SFS home game of Roosters v Souths, Home game for us and we would be in the Members and vice versa when it was our away game, Half the time we all ended up in the Members anyway.
t was always good banter and rivalry

I agree. I couldn't care less if they play out of the new SFS or not the only issue I have with another full time tenant is that I don't think the pitch quality could handle more matches it's already proven to be terrible at times particularly when we get a decent amount of rain.

[The Lip]

I think it’s is tribalism outrageous that the idea of us sharing our spiritual home with the arch enemy is even mentioned. It makes a nonsense of tribalism in the game, which is what the competition was built on. Next we'll be picking composite teams and lending players to and fro.

AFL to be honest is the Cheif of tribalism - how many share the MCG as their home down there?

[Mickie Lane]

The Roosters have a contract with clauses.

Fill me in, like what?