Time for legal action

[player 1]

It would seem the rule in regards to agenda pushing on here has been scrapped or no longer enforced.

It seems to depend who you are and who you know - a bit like life!

But, eventually "The Pendulum"/Tobin was punted - or did he die?

[Geohood]

No player is bigger than the club, my love is the club.

I want what is best for the club.

IMO this bloke is neither good for the club on or off the field.

His form on the field is proof enough, his form off the field will shortly catch up with him!!!!!!!

Having Maloney here next year will be a massive help. Pearce isn't someone that you want as the focal point of your attack. He has moments of brilliance but can't seem to keep it up for 80 minutes when he's the main person relied on.

[Ray Stehr]

We should be off to court, sueing the Roosters for impersonating a footy team.

[Geohood]

We should be off to court, sueing the Roosters for impersonating a footy team.

Providing the comedic relief as usual haha

[kurtsherlock6]

Providing the comedic relief as usual haha

Yeah, clowns are good for that.

[Guest]

It would seem the rule in regards to agenda pushing on here has been scrapped or no longer enforced.

yep

[Guest]

Its blindly obvious to even the biggest rooster hater that we are cheated,....if its a 50 50 call it goes against us, if its a big hit, were penalised, if were quick off the line, were offside, if the defender lays all over the guy playing the ball, hes milking it, vice versa we get penalised. Sick to death. This is costing us wins, free to air game time, crowds, publicity, sponsorship and loss in revenue. As a business surely we have grounds to take legal action? the evidence is there for all to see....we have atleast 5 yrs of video evidence. When will this end? Its time for an inquirey as this is starting to get blatant.

If you intend to use video evidence in the court of law ... I can tell you now that any benefit of the doubt will go against us

[Andrew Walker]

Punching a bloke and receiving a penalty.

Staying down after getting your legs taken out and receiving a penalty (this happens at least 20 farken times a game. WTF IS A CANNONBALL TACKLE ? I ASSUMED THAT IT WAS A DIVE INTO A STATIONARY ATTACKERS LEGS WHO IS BEING HELD UP BY OTHER PLAYERS. Someone explain to me why Mose is not allowed to tackle the legs of a player who is still trying to eat metres ?)


Those two were by far the worst decisions tonight. I am literally at a loss to even fathom as to how they will justify these penalties.

I also thought the forward pass prios to the JWH shot penalty was a bit sus but i don't really know the rules as to which one overrules the other.

The expmanation given We are concerned with the force he used The explanation is far more more baffling than the actual penalty

[theGman]

Having Maloney here next year will be a massive help. Pearce isn't someone that you want as the focal point of your attack. He has moments of brilliance but can't seem to keep it up for 80 minutes when he's the main person relied on.

I totally agree with that statement. Maloney's maturity & experience would have won us that type of game imo. Something positive to look forward too i guess