I think that would make sense.
Obviously, if Carney is being signed, Braith is going to be shifting to lock.
If that is the case, we really need a 40+ tackler like Fitzgibbon.
However, if Carney didn't sign, and Braith stayed at five-eighth, then yes, we should definitely play Mitch Aubusson at lock, then we could shift Myles to the backrow and play an extra-prop like Waerea-Hargreaves or Mose Masoe.
Obviously, if Carney is being signed, Braith is going to be shifting to lock.
If that is the case, we really need a 40+ tackler like Fitzgibbon.
However, if Carney didn't sign, and Braith stayed at five-eighth, then yes, we should definitely play Mitch Aubusson at lock, then we could shift Myles to the backrow and play an extra-prop like Waerea-Hargreaves or Mose Masoe.
Comment