Originally posted by kegs1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1 Outside Back Short
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Greedy666 View PostBecause I gave your Mrs the benefit of the doubt at first and it turns out she wasn't value for money.
I don't want to make the same mistake twice!
Comment
-
Originally posted by kegs1 View Postyouve brought this argument out again.
IMO rugby union players are better than rugby league players.
IMO, if the kangas played the all blacks in union, theyd get hammered, AND IN MY OPINION, if the kangas played the all blacks in league, the ab's would give them a run for their money.
rugby players are stronger, fitter, smarter and more resourceful.
ill give you an example:
in league, teams often go in with four props. two start, stay on for twenty minutes, get replaced, and come back on with twenty minutes to go. that means four props each play roughly 40 minutes each.
in union, teams often go in with three props. two starts, one plays the whole game and the other comes off with around 15 minutes to go. that means one prop plays 80, one plays 65 and the other plays 15
The FlogPen .
You know it makes sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kegs1 View Postyouve brought this argument out again.
IMO rugby union players are better than rugby league players.
IMO, if the kangas played the all blacks in union, theyd get hammered, AND IN MY OPINION, if the kangas played the all blacks in league, the ab's would give them a run for their money.
rugby players are stronger, fitter, smarter and more resourceful.
ill give you an example:
in league, teams often go in with four props. two start, stay on for twenty minutes, get replaced, and come back on with twenty minutes to go. that means four props each play roughly 40 minutes each.
in union, teams often go in with three props. two starts, one plays the whole game and the other comes off with around 15 minutes to go. that means one prop plays 80, one plays 65 and the other plays 15
You actually believe this?
Compare tackle counts, then get back to reality.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kegs1 View Postyouve brought this argument out again.
IMO rugby union players are better than rugby league players.
IMO, if the kangas played the all blacks in union, theyd get hammered, AND IN MY OPINION, if the kangas played the all blacks in league, the ab's would give them a run for their money.
rugby players are stronger, fitter, smarter and more resourceful.
ill give you an example:
in league, teams often go in with four props. two start, stay on for twenty minutes, get replaced, and come back on with twenty minutes to go. that means four props each play roughly 40 minutes each.
in union, teams often go in with three props. two starts, one plays the whole game and the other comes off with around 15 minutes to go. that means one prop plays 80, one plays 65 and the other plays 15
Comment
-
Originally posted by stsae View PostWith all due respect I am guessing you have played neither game, especially as a forward, mate???
i am a flanker in union and a dummy half in league, and i cant remmeber getting subbed off in my six years of playing. (im 17)Last edited by kegs1; 09-09-2012, 07:00 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Eggfather View PostWhat you fail to mention is that a rugby league player, due to the speed of the game and the defensive requirements, burns much more petrol per minute than a union player. It looks like those union players are standing around waiting for a bus for most of the game. Too many delays in union. They would have to adjust to constantly being in position making one on one tackles and then getting off the player quickly. These actions and the speed at which they need to happen would burn a union player.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bansai Pipeline View PostJesus Christ.
You actually believe this?
Compare tackle counts, then get back to reality.
Comment
Comment