Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

League's Top 50 issues according to Rothfield

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Lemon_Goat View Post
    Lol

    Do something about the Roosters employing a cap chaet

    Get Johns Grant head off television

    Get rid of Phillip Ronald Gould

    Stop Maroons from singing their victory song

    Engrave Sharks name on the 2013 trphy


    IMO he doesnt classify as a journalist dont know why all these SMH readers rate him so highly. OPEN YOUR EYES!!!!!

    Hes terrible. Im referring to the people who read SMH who rate him
    Is that a picture of you in your avater?

    You look Italian.

    Comment


    • #32
      Who cares if POS knew. The Storm were just looking after the guys that they had developed & paying them what they were worth to stop the Broncos Roosters Dogs & every other club from poaching them. The Storm should have been given concessions for playing in the AFL heartland like the Swans get up here.

      If a club develops a player they should be allowed concessions.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Lemon_Goat View Post
        Lol

        Do something about the Roosters employing a cap chaet

        Get Johns Grant head off television

        Get rid of Phillip Ronald Gould

        Stop Maroons from singing their victory song

        Engrave Sharks name on the 2013 trphy


        IMO he doesnt classify as a journalist dont know why all these SMH readers rate him so highly. OPEN YOUR EYES!!!!!

        Hes terrible. Im referring to the people who read SMH who rate him
        He doesn't write in the SMH, you plum......

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Kingsgrove-Loiner View Post
          He doesn't write in the SMH, you plum......
          He knows that. He loves a wind up, so do I. He is a laugh.

          Comment


          • #35
            Lol at Rothwitt. Just the usual drivel from the beetroot cheeked fool.

            Comment


            • #36
              I like the referee having to do a post match press conference, and i think video replays should only be viewed in normal speed.

              But yeah roth is a dead set fckstain and his picking on POS is a cheapshot. nothing bout bellamy not being allowed to coach in there or that his beloved corporation tried to bring down the entire game with the superleague? He is living in the past so why not bring up these issues?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Mickey Lane View Post
                He knows that. He loves a wind up, so do I. He is a laugh.
                But you're just no good at it.

                Chook.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Vasco View Post
                  O'Sullivan was at the Storm.
                  Rothfield is protecting his bosses. O' Sullivan is a player scout. How can a player scout be responsible for that fiasco? Do the player scouts control the finances at the storm? No. Who controlled the finances at the storm at the time of the scandal? Rothfields employer, News Limited. Enough said.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Mickey Lane View Post
                    He knows that. He loves a wind up, so do I. He is a laugh.
                    I suspected that, but to be honest....I'm not sure he's smart enough.

                    I like your posts though when you write them in his 'Jimmy Dymock should be next coach as long as we get rid of BJ, Mose, FPN, sign Sonny Bill to wear the grey jumper without any logo' style.......

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by The Eggfather View Post
                      Rothfield is protecting his bosses. O' Sullivan is a player scout. How can a player scout be responsible for that fiasco? Do the player scouts control the finances at the storm? No. Who controlled the finances at the storm at the time of the scandal? Rothfields employer, News Limited. Enough said.
                      O'Sullivan's signature was on a number of the contracts that's the reason he was heavily implicated in it.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Headless Chook View Post
                        O'Sullivan's signature was on a number of the contracts that's the reason he was heavily implicated in it.
                        The players signatures are on those contracts too, but they dont seem to be as heavily implicated. O' Sullivan would not have spent Ruperts money without consent or knowledge. There is a disturbing pattern with News Limited when they get caught out. They always plead stupidity or ignorance.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by The Eggfather View Post
                          The players signatures are on those contracts too, but they dont seem to be as heavily implicated. O' Sullivan would not have spent Ruperts money without consent or knowledge. There is a disturbing pattern with News Limited when they get caught out. They always plead stupidity or ignorance.
                          Correct, but are we not hit with the full force of the law if we are in breach & plead ignorance of such laws/rules?

                          Ignorance is no excuse in the eyes of the law, nor should it be.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by The Eggfather View Post
                            The players signatures are on those contracts too, but they dont seem to be as heavily implicated. O' Sullivan would not have spent Ruperts money without consent or knowledge. There is a disturbing pattern with News Limited when they get caught out. They always plead stupidity or ignorance.
                            I agree regarding the players. Bellamy is in that boat too. I find it hard to believe that the players and coaches had no inkling what was going on. If that was the case, why did Slater's manager insist on ensuring all his 3rd party deals were included in the one contract? I think he smelled something fishy and did his best to protect his client from implication.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Headless Chook View Post
                              I agree regarding the players. Bellamy is in that boat too. I find it hard to believe that the players and coaches had no inkling what was going on. If that was the case, why did Slater's manager insist on ensuring all his 3rd party deals were included in the one contract? I think he smelled something fishy and did his best to protect his client from implication.
                              Exactly.
                              And what happened to the so-called 'chief rat'? Where is he now? Gone very quiet hasn't he. Scapegoat? Not to be confused with lemongoat.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                The only Melb player to have his signature on both contracts was Cameron Smith.

                                Neither Slater nor Inlgis signed their covert contracts, their managers did on their behalf. But as Smith doesn't have a manaager he signed both with full knowledge of the rort. Strange he's not on Buzz's list?

                                Chook.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X