Originally posted by Cockadoodledoo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sydney Roosters refuse to put a deadline on chase for Michael Jennings
Collapse
X
-
id like to see ayshford back at his homne club, born and bred in renny st paddington with his uncle a rooster, hed fot right back into the culkture! and would show pride in the jersey he grew up with! another bonus is he wouldnt have to play with braith!
Comment
-
Originally posted by stephenj View Postid like to see ayshford back at his homne club, born and bred in renny st paddington with his uncle a rooster, hed fot right back into the culkture! and would show pride in the jersey he grew up with! another bonus is he wouldnt have to play with braith!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geohood View PostIt's obvious from the press conference video that Jennings is coming.
R6 you're fishing right? ;-)
1) When a promising young centre goes down with injury at your club you don't sign a 24 year old rep player on big money and a lengthy contract. That's overkill, we need to add some depth no doubt but I'm not convinced quality is the issue.
2) Having 1 mil of your cap tied up on two centres is poor cap management imo.
3) He's not even what I'd consider one of the elite centres and he'll be earning those wages in the 2nd, 3rd & 4th ears of his contract.
I rate him highly, after Inglis & Lyon I think he's ranked in a group of blokes as the next best centres in the game (all be it quite a drop in quality). I have little doubt he'd perform for us but when you look at the best clubs over the past 5-10 years they've valued depth over quality and it's worked.
Melbourne certainly didn't suffer this year from not having star 3/4's but they had a lot of depth, and decent quality depth at that. That's where we should be heading imo.
Linnett & Graham were smart buys for our club in 2010... this is what we should be looking to do again. Don't have to be superstars but blokes who are ready to perform at first grade level.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostNot at all and for a few reasons.
1) When a promising young centre goes down with injury at your club you don't sign a 24 year old rep player on big money and a lengthy contract. That's overkill, we need to add some depth no doubt but I'm not convinced quality is the issue.
2) Having 1 mil of your cap tied up on two centres is poor cap management imo.
3) He's not even what I'd consider one of the elite centres and he'll be earning those wages in the 2nd, 3rd & 4th ears of his contract.
I rate him highly, after Inglis & Lyon I think he's ranked in a group of blokes as the next best centres in the game (all be it quite a drop in quality). I have little doubt he'd perform for us but when you look at the best clubs over the past 5-10 years they've valued depth over quality and it's worked.
Melbourne certainly didn't suffer this year from not having star 3/4's but they had a lot of depth, and decent quality depth at that. That's where we should be heading imo.
Linnett & Graham were smart buys for our club in 2010... this is what we should be looking to do again. Don't have to be superstars but blokes who are ready to perform at first grade level.Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vasco View PostI think we need class out wide, not toilers.Last edited by TDK; 01-13-2013, 12:30 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roid Rage Rooster View Post1.Sheck
7.Pearce
9.Friend fit and running is plenty
Spending 1mil+ on our centre pairing is just a band aid fix to a spine that lacks creative ball playing options. And that's nothing against Maloney, Pearce, Friend or RTS who I think are all great players there's just not a great balance there imo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roid Rage Rooster View PostLets just wait and see how RTS turns out i think he could be like a Hayne+Johnson in one
I'm certain he's a great ball runner but I'm not so convinced he has the vision to ever be a good ball player.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostHe's certainly something special, the sooner he gets a go at fullback the better.
I'm certain he's a great ball runner but I'm not so convinced he has the vision to ever be a good ball player.
friend will look good if the forwards play good, i dont think he has a creative bone in his body but nobody will bag him if the forwards make him look good by just making yards.
Pearce (if jennings signs) should now have confidence to throw the ball out wide with skd,mj,rts and sbw lurking somewhere in the open instead of having to rely on inside short balls to mini.
this could be the one yr where pearce excels because we have never had as much speed and potency in a backline since maybe hodges,mini fletcher and mullins were around together? I think 2013s is more potent but there is no freddie to distribute it, so maloney should be able to chime in enough to help pearce compensate.Last edited by milanja; 01-13-2013, 09:33 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by milanja View Postthats a massive statement about a 19yr old kid who has played 4 or 5 first grade games and played league for only one yr. hope u give him a chance to get to 24-25 before u really lose faith in him.
friend will look good if the forwards play good, i dont think he has a creative bone in his body but nobody will bag him if the forwards make him look good by just making yards.
Pearce (if jennings signs) should now have confidence to throw the ball out wide with skd,mj,rts and sbw lurking somewhere in the open instead of having to rely on inside short balls to mini.
this could be the one yr where pearce excels because we have never had as much speed and potency in a backline since maybe hodges,mini fletcher and mullins were around together? I think 2013s is more potent but there is no freddie to distribute it, so maloney should be able to chime in enough to help pearce compensate.
Comment
Comment