Sydney Club Salary Cap Investigation.

[elo]

Seriously mate???

What is the John Dory with that, I've heard nothing???

Let's just say the $1.6 million loan Souths owes to Rusty is nothing compared to the shit PHACWIT has put him in over a botched business deal he made under their proxy business Blackcourt League Investments Pty Limited. Crowe giving one year notice wasn't to South Sydney members, it was to PHACWIT to fix his shit because he wants out of it.

[stsae]

Let's just say the $1.6 million loan Souths owes to Rusty is nothing compared to the shit PHACWIT has put him in over a botched business deal he made under their proxy business Blackcourt League Investments Pty Limited. Crowe giving one year notice wasn't to South Sydney members, it was to PHACWIT to fix his shit because he wants out of it.

LOL, I gotta say that's some serious Karma for the Phonechukka to deal with.

He wanted Phacwitt, he got what he paid for.

[Guest]

LOL, I gotta say that's some serious Karma for the Phonechukka to deal with.

He wanted Phacwitt, he got what he paid for.

who is phacwitt?

[Salvatori Grubber]

P H a' C

[Chookies74]

or google...
Blackcourt League Investments Pty Limited.

[Guest]

P H a' C

cheers SG.

[stsae]

who is phacwitt?

Another fake arsed blowin trendy Souffs fruit.

Poita JohnHolmes a Carnt.

[elo]

http://www.rebelrabbitohs.com/hutch/...g-In-His-Chips

Here's some good old background information on the original falling out between Rusty and PHACwit.

[Bansai Pipeline]

would be a very boring comp without it, and some clubs (including even us) could be broke by now

some additional exclusions for developing players, long standing players etc are needed no doubt, but the overall cap itself is very necessary

Cry me a river.

You can't manage your player payments, see you later.

[Bansai Pipeline]

that will never happen mate.
no salary cap means all the richest teams will buy all the best players by offering them money that other teams cant.
then it'll turn in the epl, where you have the same teams at the top year after year, and the same teams at the bottom year after year. if one of your players does well, they get offered 5 times as much to play for a richer club, and they go.

I honestly reckon clubs should be able to operate to the best of their abilities.

If they're more successful than other clubs, they're more successful than other clubs.

I'm for dynasties.

[Salvatori Grubber]

I kind of managed to follow that linked article - to the culmination part where it positions PHaC (and, I think, Crowe) as dodgy businessmen who strategically made arrangements with Stadium Aust to buy their other private companies in exchange for Souths' commitment to the ground for 10 years.

It also posits that much of Souths' early losses were influenced by a culture of jobs-for-the-boys, nepotism and good old fashioned laundering.

I'm not sure how much of this I buy into, tbh. Perhaps it's all true and the story will come out one day, but in my opinion the article feels too much like the scrawled-in-purple-crayon meanderings of a conspiracy theorist living in his mother's house, with no company but for his awesome legion of all-knowing, subterranean renegade comrades who, with index fingers tapped knowingly against the sides of their noses, waste nanobytes of bandwidth masturbating over the ills brought on to Souths, post Piggins.

Not that I don't want it to be true, mind...

[Bansai Pipeline]

I think it's nonsense.

Rugby League is full of paranoid imbeciles with ridiculous ideas.

[roosterproud]

http://www.rebelrabbitohs.com/hutch/...g-In-His-Chips

Here's some good old background information on the original falling out between Rusty and PHACwit.

yuk
i need to wash my eyes out , after seeing sooooo much red n green together...ah this bucket of sand will do

[stsae]

http://www.rebelrabbitohs.com/hutch/...g-In-His-Chips

Here's some good old background information on the original falling out between Rusty and PHACwit.

Thanks elo.

I do tend to agree with Pipe, lots of crazies with crazier ideas in RL, especially Souffs. But if true with what's written, there are some shady deals that have been done by Phacwitt. Glad he's not our problem.

[Guest]

I kind of managed to follow that linked article - to the culmination part where it positions PHaC (and, I think, Crowe) as dodgy businessmen who strategically made arrangements with Stadium Aust to buy their other private companies in exchange for Souths' commitment to the ground for 10 years.

It also posits that much of Souths' early losses were influenced by a culture of jobs-for-the-boys, nepotism and good old fashioned laundering.

I'm not sure how much of this I buy into, tbh. Perhaps it's all true and the story will come out one day, but in my opinion the article feels too much like the scrawled-in-purple-crayon meanderings of a conspiracy theorist living in his mother's house, with no company but for his awesome legion of all-knowing, subterranean renegade comrades who, with index fingers tapped knowingly against the sides of their noses, waste nanobytes of bandwidth masturbating over the ills brought on to Souths, post Piggins.

Not that I don't want it to be true, mind...

Mate to many big words for me to google to find out the meanings.

So who still lives in there mothers house, phonechucker or PHACwit?