Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SBW out, O'Donnell likely to play

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SBW out, O'Donnell likely to play

    Take your pick of articles

    http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/l...218-2enkc.html

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226580671840

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226580686614

    Trent Robinson on SBW;
    "He won't play," Robinson said. "I don't want to play cat and mouse with anyone here because there are already too many games going on.

    "Sonny only starts tackling (today) and then we will get an idea of how strong he is. We will make a call then.

    "But I would be saying right now that he is not going to be playing this weekend.

    "If he jumps out of the blocks (today), and he could do, well, that leaves the door slightly open.

    "But that's the only thing that could change things here, if he does some tackling (today) and (tomorrow) and the (medical staff) say; 'Look, he can play 20 minutes or something'. But we haven't trained this week yet."

    Trent Robinson on Luke O'donnell
    ''He has just got [off] the flight so he will do a bit of running and train with us on Wednesday and we will see how he is,'' Robinson said of O'Donnell.
    Advertisement

    ''He has already played but it would be nice to get him into our structures and that sort of stuff for 20 or 30 minutes.''

  • #2
    ''He has already played but it would be nice to get him into our structures and that sort of stuff for 20 or 30 minutes"

    ...gee isn't it refreshing to hear we actually have structures in place !

    Comment


    • #3
      wow we now have structures? how times have changed? we looked very structured last saturday night compared to last year!

      Comment


      • #4
        fascinating insite into the cor[porate culture of both newspapers, news corp telegraph all how dare sbw not play injured thus costing the fox network some viewers! Fairfax used to opportunity to introduce lod in to the mix, probably a much more factual report? this of course is just a prelim report furor a footy game trial, just imagine the differing bias when the real news is reported? no wonder the alp are furious with the Murdoch press!

        Comment


        • #5
          I never expected SBW to play this week as he needs a bit more time from getting his head smacked in...but you never know he may get on for 10 minutes after he does his fitness thing this morning
          Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by stephenj View Post
            fascinating insite into the cor[porate culture of both newspapers, news corp telegraph all how dare sbw not play injured thus costing the fox network some viewers! Fairfax used to opportunity to introduce lod in to the mix, probably a much more factual report? this of course is just a prelim report furor a footy game trial, just imagine the differing bias when the real news is reported? no wonder the alp are furious with the Murdoch press!

            lol

            Comment


            • #7
              Steve seriously mate not everything is a News Limited/ALP conspiracy.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by stephenj View Post
                fascinating insite into the cor[porate culture of both newspapers, news corp telegraph all how dare sbw not play injured thus costing the fox network some viewers! Fairfax used to opportunity to introduce lod in to the mix, probably a much more factual report? this of course is just a prelim report furor a footy game trial, just imagine the differing bias when the real news is reported? no wonder the alp are furious with the Murdoch press!
                what a lot of gibberish "your" report is

                nowhere does the article state or imply anything like "how dare sbw not play"

                all it says is him not playing will cost fox viewers, which is true

                and the other DT article gives Robinson the opportunity to explain that they're managing his injury etc etc

                your irrepressible desire to bag everything the paper does at every opportunity is affecting your ability to read

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by tony the wheel View Post
                  what a lot of gibberish "your" report is

                  nowhere does the article state or imply anything like "how dare sbw not play"

                  all it says is him not playing will cost fox viewers, which is true

                  and the other DT article gives Robinson the opportunity to explain that they're managing his injury etc etc

                  your irrepressible desire to bag everything the paper does at every opportunity is affecting your ability to read
                  Yes but in SJ's defence Slothfield goes out of his way to discredit and disrupt our side .....the other reporters are ok ..The sloth wont earn any respect if he give any ........He is basically terrible an I dont know how he holds his job.
                  Bring back Frilingos .
                  So I feel SJ will do the same in return -fair game.
                  I couldnt give a shit about sloth I usually skip his shit but end up reading it here in its complaint form -That guy needs to grow up too.
                  Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    How a 'man' in a sporting world/environemnt can take solace and pride in being a gossip columnist is beyond me.. He doesn't even hide from the fact that's all he is, proudly writting about gus' hair, who is shagging who in toilets.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      ok fitzy , i agree with your point , im happy to delete the post if you wish? ok my 'gibberish report is now deleted, ill bet the cant delete the gibberish generated by newscorp so easily? everything in the murdoch press is calculated to impact on their corporate goals, if you dont believe that you are a fool!
                      even though murdochs support for the republicans and tea party in the recent us presidential election was a disaster murdoch who has more money than he or his family could ever spend now only does it for control, the thrill of power, gina rheinhart desires the same but on the way shed like to make some more cash too? yes football , politics and news media are very closely intertwined?
                      Last edited by stephenj; 02-19-2013, 12:36 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by The Brain View Post
                        Yes but in SJ's defence Slothfield goes out of his way to discredit and disrupt our side .....the other reporters are ok ..The sloth wont earn any respect if he give any ........He is basically terrible an I dont know how he holds his job.
                        Bring back Frilingos.
                        So I feel SJ will do the same in return -fair game.
                        I couldnt give a shit about sloth I usually skip his shit but end up reading it here in its complaint form -That guy needs to grow up too.
                        After 9 years dead he'd still be a better journo than alcho cheeks.

                        Chook.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by stephenj View Post
                          fascinating insite into the cor[porate culture of both newspapers, news corp telegraph all how dare sbw not play injured thus costing the fox network some viewers! Fairfax used to opportunity to introduce lod in to the mix, probably a much more factual report? this of course is just a prelim report furor a footy game trial, just imagine the differing bias when the real news is reported? no wonder the alp are furious with the Murdoch press!
                          Kent was invited as a panelist on the drugs in sport special last week,but Rothfields absence (as self professed editor in charge) said it all...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            by losing market share, ie viewers watching surely that is costing foxtel, an arm of newscorp money? by inference how dare sbw and the roosters dare to cost news money? its a long bow but possably a very valid one? why else would a half backed sports hack employed by the murdoch press renew his vigorous anti roosters cry? you might remember if you are old enough that it was easts who stopped the newscorp super league from winning the battle initially? so in essence we did cost news a lot of money!so in the eyes of buzz, thats continuing?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by stephenj View Post
                              by losing market share, ie viewers watching surely that is costing foxtel, an arm of newscorp money? by inference how dare sbw and the roosters dare to cost news money? its a long bow but possably a very valid one? why else would a half backed sports hack employed by the murdoch press renew his vigorous anti roosters cry? you might remember if you are old enough that it was easts who stopped the newscorp super league from winning the battle initially? so in essence we did cost news a lot of money!so in the eyes of buzz, thats continuing?
                              Hence Rothfields continual diatribe attacks of Nick Politis

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X