Gould on Pearce today

[Guest]

Given up on Soward have you? Reynolds is now your mister master?

Chook.

Soward was a Good mate, haven't spoken to him 2 yrs.

Reynolds is a much better all round player, who is a winner

Apart from him being a Souffs player, i have no shame in admiring his football talents

The Kid has got it, he is made of the right stuff

The Teflon Kid has not

[Guest]

Which says alot about the Teflon Kid doesn't it

How many field goals has this bloke nailed to get them home, at least 3 or 4

Pearce's attempts are closer to the corner post.

Some of you blokes need to extract your hand from his pants and smell the roses

All I can smell is your bullsh!t

[Rooster_6]

Yet has single handedly won more games than The Teflon Kid in that short time frame.

Sadly he will win a premiership before The Teflon Kid

You can keep on posting your favourite Rugby League clichés but it doesn't make them any more true. Try watching a game, analysing it and then actually posting your opinions on it for once. Your repetitiveness does get a little boring, Reynolds is just your latest fad after Sandow, Mullen, Walsh & Soward. Did I miss anyone else?

[Guest]

All I can smell is your bullsh!t

Truth hurt does it ?

Comeback with an argument that relates to your theory that pearce is better than Reynolds.

Before the street lights come on, i know it would be passed your bedtime otherwise

[Guest]

Soward was a Good mate, haven't spoken to him 2 yrs.

Reynolds is a much better all round player, who is a winner

Apart from him being a Souffs player, i have no shame in admiring his football talents

The Kid has got it, he is made of the right stuff

The Teflon Kid has not

And yet you can't or won't see the similarities between the two. Soward played in a structured, well coached side and looked like a winner to all and sundry, including you. Reynolds is exactly the same, plays in a structured, well coached side and looks like a winner to all and sundry, again including you.

What about Soward now? No structure, not well coached and looks like the dumb, overrated, tubby fark we all told you he was. Why don't you compare Pearce to him now? You don't have to answer, we all know the reason.

Chook.

[Rooster_6]

Soward had no running game in 09 and 10?

2009 & 2010 were two of his most prolific try scoring seasons, I don't know how a half with no running game scores 12 tries in 2009?

Both Soward & Reynolds are good support players but not much more else. They play way too deep to ever take on the line effectively.

[Guest]

You can keep on posting your favourite Rugby League clichés but it doesn't make them any more true. Try watching a game, analysing it and then actually posting your opinions on it for once. Your repetitiveness does get a little boring, Reynolds is just your latest fad after Sandow, Mullen, Walsh & Soward. Did I miss anyone else?

Mullen and Walsh???? They are on a par with Pearce, i rate none of them.

I want a matchwinner as a halfback

Soward let things go to his head and chose religion, his footy days are numbered IMO

A fit and happy Sandow is a much better player than Pearce, the bloke is a grub ( as has been Pearce in the past) but he knows how to win a footy game with a touch of magic.

Pearce relies on others

Twist the argument in favour of your wet dream all you like.

My argument is reynolds is better than and already won more games than Pearce with a clutch play.

[Guest]

2009 & 2010 were two of his most prolific try scoring seasons, I don't know how a half with no running game scores 12 tries in 2009?

Both Soward & Reynolds are good support players but not much more else. They play way too deep to ever take on the line effectively.

chip and chase? haha but seriously., most of his tries were from intercepts and backing up the line breaker....not from dummying and running and taking the line on himself

[Guest]

Truth hurt does it ?

Comeback with an argument that relates to your theory that pearce is better than Reynolds.

Before the street lights come on, i know it would be passed your bedtime otherwise

Yeah, because I want to spend my day debating an idiot.

[Guest]

2009 & 2010 were two of his most prolific try scoring seasons, I don't know how a half with no running game scores 12 tries in 2009?

Both Soward & Reynolds are good support players but not much more else. They play way too deep to ever take on the line effectively.

6, you said the Soward of 2009 and 2010 reminds you of Reynolds. Then you say Soward did have a running game then, but Reynolds hasn't.

Which is it?

[Rooster_6]

Mullen and Walsh???? They are on a par with Pearce, i rate none of them.

I want a matchwinner as a halfback

Soward let things go to his head and chose religion, his footy days are numbered IMO

A fit and happy Sandow is a much better player than Pearce, the bloke is a grub ( as has been Pearce in the past) but he knows how to win a footy game with a touch of magic.

Pearce relies on others

Twist the argument in favour of your wet dream all you like.

My argument is reynolds is better than and already won more games than Pearce with a clutch play.

I never said Pearce was a match winner, I'm not the one twisting the argument in my favour.

If you think Reynolds is the reason Souths are a top 4 side I can't wait for the day when Inglis spends a significant period of time out injured. It'll be Bennett leaving Soward all over again, you'll undoubtedly make up crap reasons like 'religion' again as opposed to admitting your were wrong all along.

Religion.... lol. You're so full of it.

[Guest]

Before the street lights come on, i know it would be passed your bedtime otherwise

Lol ....insults have never been lamer hahahahahaha, that is pathetic, ...stick with "i am rubber you are glue":

[Guest]

So when do we expect the "I lurve JuJu thread??"..

I'm loving the love shown in this thread..

[Rooster_6]

6, you said the Soward of 2009 and 2010 reminds you of Reynolds. Then you say Soward did have a running game then, but Reynolds hasn't.

Which is it?

No I didn't, I said Reynolds is a good support player like Soward.

Feel free to quote me but I'm sure I never said that...

[Guest]

And yet you can't or won't see the similarities between the two. Soward played in a structured, well coached side and looked like a winner to all and sundry, including you. Reynolds is exactly the same, plays in a structured, well coached side and looks like a winner to all and sundry, again including you.

What about Soward now? No structure, not well coached and looks like the dumb, overrated, tubby fark we all told you he was. Why don't you compare Pearce to him now? You don't have to answer, we all know the reason.

Chook.

Easy chook, if we were in a Grand final tomorrow against the vermin or the Merge.

Who would you honestly back to make the winning play via a 40/20, a field goal, a chip and chase etc.

Soward and Reynolds have it all over The Teflon Kid is this regard

Anybody that honestly answers Pearce has no idea.

Has has not got the clutch play in his kit bag, he has not got the Footy Brain to make the right play at the right time.

I have said all along he is an above average first grade footballer, no more no less

Having one of these as a halfback does not win you a comp these days.

I have also said as a hooker he would be the incumbant to Cam Smith, he is a hooker playing half, Joey got away with it because he was a freak, Teflon is far from that.