Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why the club need to challenge JWH's charge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    JWH's tackle on Rose was the same type of tackle that was deemed legal in the 2010 final against the Tigers, ironically against JWH.

    The next stitch up will be when one of our players throws a punch.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by milanja View Post
      this must be a post from the 1980's? nothing wrong with spearing a head into the ground either, if the cant handle a good spearing then they should go find a harder sport to play.
      It's nothing like the same. Nothing like it at all.

      5 weeks for a smack around the chops. For chrissakes.

      I'm not blaming the players, mind you, I'm blaming the soft in the gut desk jockeys who run the game these days.

      What a sad, pathetic rabble.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Tom Verlaine's Ghost View Post
        It's nothing like the same. Nothing like it at all.

        5 weeks for a smack around the chops. For chrissakes.

        I'm not blaming the players, mind you, I'm blaming the soft in the gut desk jockeys who run the game these days.


        What a sad, pathetic rabble.
        mate you still got to remember the tackle itself is only a 2 week charge, the other 3 weeks is on jwh's previous record.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by milanja View Post
          mate you still got to remember the tackle itself is only a 2 week charge, the other 3 weeks is on jwh's previous record.
          Which is also rediculous,as it is carry over from 2 years ago...

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by milanja View Post
            mate you still got to remember the tackle itself is only a 2 week charge, the other 3 weeks is on jwh's previous record.
            Does this mean now that after 5 weeks he will have no carry overs?
            " A man can only walk as far as he can see"

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by SConcierge View Post
              Does this mean now that after 5 weeks he will have no carry overs?
              No he will still have carry over points, not sure how many but I do know that for every game he plays and doesn't get charged they take 5 points off when he comes back.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by SConcierge View Post
                Does this mean now that after 5 weeks he will have no carry overs?
                pretty sure the loading offences acrue but after 2yrs they are taken away, so by the time jwh has his 5 week break his loading will be back to 100% loading, then i think in august his other 2yr loading goes away so he is left with this one he just copped for another 2yrs which may be a 50% loading. confused yet???

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by milanja View Post
                  pretty sure the loading offences acrue but after 2yrs they are taken away, so by the time jwh has his 5 week break his loading will be back to 100% loading, then i think in august his other 2yr loading goes away so he is left with this one he just copped for another 2yrs which may be a 50% loading. confused yet???
                  thats farked do the crime serve the time game over this carry over shyte is BS
                  " A man can only walk as far as he can see"

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X