Just heard a bloke named Tim Gore talk about the Roosters and penalties. Basically, his argument is:
The Roosters have the best defence.
The Roosters are the most penalised.
Therefore the Roosters have the best defence BECAUSE they are the most penalised.
In other words, they are cheating in defence and getting away with it.
His solution:
Sin bin Roosters players if they concede 3 penalties in a game.
Suspend Roosters players if they concede a certain number of penalties in the course of a year.
(Then, presumably, it will be much easier for Souths to win the comp.)
The Roosters have the best defence.
The Roosters are the most penalised.
Therefore the Roosters have the best defence BECAUSE they are the most penalised.
In other words, they are cheating in defence and getting away with it.
His solution:
Sin bin Roosters players if they concede 3 penalties in a game.
Suspend Roosters players if they concede a certain number of penalties in the course of a year.
(Then, presumably, it will be much easier for Souths to win the comp.)
Comment