Refs, commentators, and tactics

[liver1971]

name calling? 1971 = last time souffs won a premiership, it was just the first thing that came to my mind.
I said I accept that it was a penalty because that is the rule, I that said that they should change the rule, in my opinion.
understand?

I was born in that year
So let me " understand '' you want the nrl to change the rules so when a player passes after there ball carry arm has come in contact with turf , they can give the ball back to that player ? Great idea whilst they are at it just get rid the double movement rule too

[Guest]

Nobody missed it, it was shown several times on replay & it was agreed by all it was a try. As i said before, not even the souffs players complained but i suppose they probably wernt watching the play

it could easily have been called held.

[Guest]

So you think we were more than twice as ill discplined as souffs. Fark me i give up.

we conceded twice as many penalties...

[roostersrule2]

So you think we were more than twice as ill discplined as souffs. Fark me i give up.

The eye gouging, leg twisting, nut grabbing souffs are the bestest at dishiplin.

[Guest]

He had the jersey on his head/neck and does walking off the mark even get policed anymore? I haven't seen a penalty for it all year and it happens in every game.

no it doesn't, inglis exploits it badly, I would hope that some captains get in the refs ear about it...

[kurtsherlock6]

it could easily have been called held.

And it would of been yet another incorrect call against us.

[Guest]

I was born in that year
So let me " understand '' you want the nrl to change the rules so when a player passes after there ball carry arm has come in contact with turf , they can give the ball back to that player ? Great idea whilst they are at it just get rid the double movement rule too

he passed it as his arm touched the ground, obviously he cant be on the ground for 5 seconds, then get up and pass it.
if it simultaneous, similarly to when the ref calls held and an offload is given, it should just go back to playing the ball.

[Guest]

And it would of been yet another incorrect call against us.

50/50

[kurtsherlock6]

50/50

If you say so.

[roostersrule2]

If you say so.

He probably doesn't even think that he just likes to have a different opinion, probably so he can argue with people.

[liver1971]

he passed it as his arm touched the ground, obviously he cant be on the ground for 5 seconds, then get up and pass it.
if it simultaneous, similarly to when the ref calls held and an offload is given, it should just go back to playing the ball.

I believe part of the reason they give players benefit of the doubt with passing whilst tackled is because they may not hear them .Thats why its different with passing off the ground

[Guest]

He probably doesn't even think that he just likes to have a different opinion, probably so he can argue with people.

youre always going to get debates* on internet forums, as much as I piss ks6 off I would much rather debate with him than the rooster moronacle.

[kurtsherlock6]

He probably doesn't even think that he just likes to have a different opinion, probably so he can argue with people.

LOL, he loves the attention.

[Guest]

I believe part of the reason they give players benefit of the doubt with passing whilst tackled is because they may not hear them .Thats why its different with passing off the ground

true, but when it is simultaneous like the SBW penalty was, I think it should be a play the ball.

[roostersrule2]

youre always going to get debates* on internet forums, as much as I piss ks6 off I would much rather debate with him than the rooster moronacle.

That's right, you do get arguments on forums, one more gold star and you'll be student of the week.