disgraceful media driven agenda regarding JWH and Burgess

[Guest]

wrong

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226714710373

It's irrelevant elbow or forearm to me it was a bit of both.

But as I said before did you see the Pomeroy incident?

If they charge Jared after letting him off it's a clear double standard.

Surely you can at least acknowledge that?

[bondi-boy]

Paul Crawley is calling it an elbow... so now the elbow extends all the way down to the hand does it?

Honestly, these people do need to go to 'OPSM' and get some glasses/new glasses.

Or get a clear tv screen, with a freeze frame facility.


Or they're just making mischief...have agendas.

[Waerea-Beast!]

wrong

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226714710373

Seriously, get your eyes checked!

[Johnny.]

In the still shot of that hit, you clearly see JWH's elbow hit McQueen's collarbone.

That's not the throat.

[Guest]

Come on Tony watch that and you tell me if Jared should be suspended.

[Andrew Walker]

On that Hargreaves has no case to answer

[Tommy Smith]

you should have seen him carry on during the game. here are a few from his twitter account:

BUZZ ROTHFIELD @BuzzRothfield 6 Sep
Has SBW ever been hooked? #padstow #maccas
(after SBW missed the tackle on inglis)

BUZZ ROTHFIELD @BuzzRothfield 6 Sep
I'm going to vomit if these blokes don't shut up about SBW.

BUZZ ROTHFIELD @BuzzRothfield 6 Sep
He was tackled.
(after Maloneys second try)

BUZZ ROTHFIELD @BuzzRothfield 6 Sep
Shoreline not true indication. Walker and Farrell should have scored. Sam Burgess went close. Different result next time.
(obviously had money on souffs)

lol What a clown.

It makes the taste of victory so much sweeter.

[Waerea-Beast!]

In the still shot of that hit, you clearly see JWH's elbow hit McQueen's collarbone.

That's not the throat.

I would call "hit" a major over statement. Secondary contact due to the initial contact - his arm can't disappear after contact. Penalty sufficient.

[The Rooster Oracle]

wrong

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226714710373

That photo is deceiving bull$hit! That photo is a split second slow from showing the initial contact which was the forearm. Because that photo is a split second later, naturally because JWH is moving forward his arm scrapes along the top of macqueen's upper chest/collarbone so at the point of that photo was (conveniently for the dailytellucrap) taken at the time of when JWH elbow was in line with macqueen's upper chest/collarbone after he had moved further forward.

The anti roosters brigade in the media are trying to make out as though JWH's elbow was cocked with a closed fist and he deliberately did it. Nothing could be further from the truth, but hey, let's not allow facts to get in the way of a good story which is the motto created by phil rothwit for the dailytellucrap!!

[Muffdaddy]

Depends what the definition of an elbow and a forearm is.
Is the fore arm from your wrist to the point of the elbow? If so, JWH gets him with his fore arm.
Is the elbow just the pointy bit? if so, no elbow.
If the elbow extend to more than 3-4cms from either part of the pointy bit then JWH elbowed him.

[The Rooster Oracle]

On that Hargreaves has no case to answer

Exactly, the precedent has been set.

[Johnny.]

I would call "hit" a major over statement. Secondary contact due to the initial contact - his arm can't disappear after contact. Penalty sufficient.

Yes. Forgive the poor choice of word.

[Guest]

It's irrelevant elbow or forearm to me it was a bit of both.

But as I said before did you see the Pomeroy incident?

If they charge Jared after letting him off it's a clear double standard.

Surely you can at least acknowledge that?

didn't see the Pomeroy one

is there a link?

[chook 56]

didn't see the Pomeroy one

is there a link?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djHvLHa3TvA

[Thirteen]

When will we hear if JWH is being charged or not?