Originally posted by Vasco
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
thoughts on how to beat Manly?
Collapse
X
-
(1)/(2) is given a much harder draw, previously it only had to beat 8 to get the week off. Under the currently system you've got to beat 4 (or in your case 3). Its a much harder match and sets up the situation where 1 or 2 are more likely to go out in straight sets.
Under the old system , (3) was unlikely to go out first up, but if it did so what?Proud member of the Ricky Stuart Appreciation club - Laurie Frier walks on water tra lal lala lar la la lar.
A Rooster is a cocky strutting bird that will not take a backward step!
Comment
-
Originally posted by tony the wheel View PostIf finish in the top 4 and lose 2 semis, you deserve to be out
Under the old system, the team that finished 3rd after the regular season could be out after losing just their first semi, which is totally unfairWhen you trust your television
what you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
they can bend it all they want
John Mayer
Comment
-
Originally posted by tri-hard View Post(1)/(2) is given a much harder draw, previously it only had to beat 8 to get the week off. Under the currently system you've got to beat 4 (or in your case 3). Its a much harder match and sets up the situation where 1 or 2 are more likely to go out in straight sets.
Under the old system , (3) was unlikely to go out first up, but if it did so what?
IMO we should be playing top 6 only, with 1 and 2 getting the first week off while 3 v 6, 4 v 5. But the NRL would lose a bucket load of money if it did that. Teams coming 7 and 8 usually only with 50% of their games. I can't see how this should be enough to play semifinal football.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fleabag Fletch View PostThats right. The system we have now is worse for teams 1 and 2, better for teams 3 and 4, worse for teams 5 and 6 and better for teams 7 and 8!
IMO we should be playing top 6 only, with 1 and 2 getting the first week off while 3 v 6, 4 v 5. But the NRL would lose a bucket load of money if it did that. Teams coming 7 and 8 usually only with 50% of their games. I can't see how this should be enough to play semifinal football.
1 You do not play each other twice
2 Sides whom are heavily representerd at SOO time can be majorly disadvanatged throughout the year
Adress these two issues then a top 6 ios the way to go
This isnt directed at you as I am not sure wheer you have stood on this I find it amusing now that we have finished 1st people are now trotting out this line that we are disadvantaged Yet aprt ffrom myslef I cannot really remeber anyone on here who was in favour of the Macintyre system that we previously had when it was in place All i recall is peple saying it should be replaced with the AFL systemWhen you trust your television
what you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
they can bend it all they want
John Mayer
Comment
-
Originally posted by Andrew Walker View PostI agree with this But a couple of crucial things that you are not touching on make it fair for there to be a top 8
1 You do not play each other twice
2 Sides whom are heavily representerd at SOO time can be majorly disadvanatged throughout the year
Adress these two issues then a top 6 ios the way to go
This isnt directed at you as I am not sure wheer you have stood on this I find it amusing now that we have finished 1st people are now trotting out this line that we are disadvantaged Yet aprt ffrom myslef I cannot really remeber anyone on here who was in favour of the Macintyre system that we previously had when it was in place All i recall is peple saying it should be replaced with the AFL system
the top side should be given more advantages not less. And I didn 't mind the fact that if you lost it kept you on the edge of your seat all weekend barracking for |Wests or Parra.Proud member of the Ricky Stuart Appreciation club - Laurie Frier walks on water tra lal lala lar la la lar.
A Rooster is a cocky strutting bird that will not take a backward step!
Comment
Comment