I was at the game and have watched the first half of the game on tv. Both sides were awesome in defence.
However, Manly were allowed to get away with leg pulls, standing a step in front of the ref (especially when we were working it off our line) and were often offside at kicks but allowed to get involved in the play (on one occasion they got a dropout despite Foran being offside by a metre and Cummins did ask the vidiots to check this).
We did get away with the occasional thing but nowhere near as much as Manly. In fact, I thought we made a conscious effort to try & not give away penalties. I don't believe in conspiracy theories but we are not getting a fair go.
Our halves rarely had the time, space or position - especially in the second half - to do much more than bomb. Hard to be a dominant half when your pack's not dominant. As for being similar to origin, the best creative halves are Queenslanders. We all saw in the Souffs game that Reynolds is no better than Pearce at trying to break a game open when his forwards aren't dominant.
However, Manly were allowed to get away with leg pulls, standing a step in front of the ref (especially when we were working it off our line) and were often offside at kicks but allowed to get involved in the play (on one occasion they got a dropout despite Foran being offside by a metre and Cummins did ask the vidiots to check this).
We did get away with the occasional thing but nowhere near as much as Manly. In fact, I thought we made a conscious effort to try & not give away penalties. I don't believe in conspiracy theories but we are not getting a fair go.
Our halves rarely had the time, space or position - especially in the second half - to do much more than bomb. Hard to be a dominant half when your pack's not dominant. As for being similar to origin, the best creative halves are Queenslanders. We all saw in the Souffs game that Reynolds is no better than Pearce at trying to break a game open when his forwards aren't dominant.
Comment