Josh Massoud v Easts

[Guest]

After his embarrassing effort on the footy show the other night, hours after which he was on twitter back tracking, he now comes out with a story where he talks about how two of the players families were impacted directly after the stories his papers ran earlier in the week trying to mask it behind a galvanising story.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226728871284

Some of you may also be interested in one of his pictures from twitter and his feelings on Easts, which go to support everything backwards (stsae) has said when talking refs.
https://mobile.twitter.com/josh_mass...927488/photo/1

#weak
#prick

[Guest]

Pathetic. Very disappointing reporting this week. Massoud on the Footy show with his scoop about Roosters and party drugs that was apparently a slip of the tongue should be hung out to dry. What a sad excuse for a reporter. Has any papers had big headlines on how it was all a mistake?

[Guest]

Pathetic. Very disappointing reporting this week. Massoud on the Footy show with his scoop about Roosters and party drugs that was apparently a slip of the tongue should be hung out to dry. What a sad excuse for a reporter. Has any papers had big headlines on how it was all a mistake?

I wonder who he supports.

[Chook Norris]

Deadset wanker of the highest order

[stsae]

Anyone else find it interesting that McWhatever woman reports this exclusive???

I've never seen her report on a game or any actual footy.

This is another perception.

I mean she must be right, that's what the sheeple think.

She's not a RL person. She has no club bias we know of. No agendas we can see. She is trying to find the truth, for the sheeple, cos she cares.

It's funny how the manipulation goes. Those newspaper bosses are smart. They keep their shareholders happy.

Any means necessary.

We are a newspapers wet dream. They've built it up so as they can now trot out almost any headline about our club and without proof it's believable.

Perceptions.

Have a look on the NRL section of the smh site. Have a look at what team has over 5300 articles some 600+ more than the next most written about club.

And that's only the smh, I shudder to think how many articles appear in the Tellucrapp.

For a club with supposedly no fans we seem to be front and centre when it comes to front and back page headlines. We sell papers.

We must be a sponsors wet dream.

Perceptions.

EASTS

[chook 56]

The headlines stick.
Small apologies at the end of an article aren't seen & absorbed by the masses.
It's amazing the number of people that will pass by our shop & look at the headlines on display out front & then come in, read the first part of the story.......wander away being "fully informed" of the breaking story.

I've had to put a few of my customer straight on this whole peptide issue.
Whether they take it on board is another matter. They are, as my old mate says, sheeple.

[Guest]

Anyone else find it interesting that McWhatever woman reports this exclusive???

I've never seen her report on a game or any actual footy.

This is another perception.

I mean she must be right, that's what the sheeple think.

She's not a RL person. She has no club bias we know of. No agendas we can see. She is trying to find the truth, for the sheeple, cos she cares.

It's funny how the manipulation goes. Those newspaper bosses are smart. They keep their shareholders happy.

Any means necessary.

We are a newspapers wet dream. They've built it up so as they can now trot out almost any headline about our club and without proof it's believable.

Perceptions.

Have a look on the NRL section of the smh site. Have a look at what team has over 5300 articles some 600+ more than the next most written about club.

And that's only the smh, I shudder to think how many articles appear in the Tellucrapp.

For a club with supposedly no fans we seem to be front and centre when it comes to front and back page headlines. We sell papers.

We must be a sponsors wet dream.

Perceptions.

EASTS

Or how gullible are the public that we participate in swallowing their hook and that we (the general public) let them play us like they do. Same with gossip mags, same with advertising, take the petrol discount for example.

I mean I don't know how many text messages I received from educated friends on Thursday and Friday quoting the DT and the footy show. Taking their shit a gospel. As much as they play on our emotions we let them as society.

[stsae]

The headlines stick.
Small apologies at the end of an article aren't seen & absorbed by the masses.
It's amazing the number of people that will pass by our shop & look at the headlines on display out front & then come in, read the first part of the story.......wander away being "fully informed" of the breaking story.

I've had to put a few of my customer straight on this whole peptide issue.
Whether they take it on board is another matter. They are, as my old mate says, sheeple.

I love how they always run with "inquiry" or "investigation" as headlines and at the start of articles.

But repeatedly we have been told by the club, the NRL and ArSeADA that they have looked at all the evidence and have found zero cause for any investigation.

It's the key words and phrases that create perceptions in the sheeple.

You must see so many that are headlineharrys maaaaaaaaaaaaaate.

[stsae]

Or how gullible are the public that we participate in swallowing their hook and that we (the general public) let them play us like they do. Same with gossip mags, same with advertising, take the petrol discount for example.

I mean I don't know how many text messages I received from educated friends on Thursday and Friday quoting the DT and the footy show. Taking their shit a gospel. As much as they play on our emotions we let them as society.

Sheeple maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaate.

Unable to look past the sensationalism of the headline. Unable to question why something's been written. What the writer has to gain. Are there any actual quotes or is there any actual evidence attached. Etc.

I bet those who watched the footy show are those same ones who NEVER watch it, haven't for 20 years now, but surprisingly Friday morning can quote word for word what the Fat was wearing. All the while complaining they left their Tellucrapp on the train.

Pointing and laughing, laughing and pointing.

[Guest]

What does the Massoud message say it isn't working for me.

[stsae]

What does the Massoud message say it isn't working for me.

It says "Chechin and Massoud sitting in a tree, K I S S I N G......."

[Guest]

It says "Chechin and Massoud sitting in a tree, K I S S I N G......."

lol

What's this place coming too maaate?

Can't even get a straight answer.

[Johnny.]

lol

What's this place coming too maaate?

Can't even get a straight answer.

If that was intentional, then I will send over Jessica Gomes to sit on your face.

[Guest]

Pathetic. Very disappointing reporting this week. Massoud on the Footy show with his scoop about Roosters and party drugs that was apparently a slip of the tongue should be hung out to dry. What a sad excuse for a reporter. Has any papers had big headlines on how it was all a mistake?

I was discussing the footy show with people at work who are not roosters fans, and they thought this Massoud was a disgrace. One of your finest moments footy show, with your expert panel. Pleeese!!!

Do you think after his performance, even the footy show thought, geez lets not invite this bloke back?

[Guest]

If that was intentional, then I will send over Jessica Gomes to sit on your face.

LOL

I'm surprised my maaaaate Backwards didn't pick it up.