Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

James Maloney says South Sydney Rabbitohs ruled the roost no matter what the rules

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • James Maloney says South Sydney Rabbitohs ruled the roost no matter what the rules

    Sydney Roosters five-eighth James Maloney has described his side's 28-8 loss to South Sydney in Thursday night's NRL season opener as a reality check for the defending premiers.

    Despite going on to win last year's grand final after losing the opening match of the season to the Rabbitohs by the almost identical scoreline of 28-6, Maloney suggested the Roosters had been guilty of looking too far ahead as they attempt to become the first club in NRL history to win back-to-back grand finals.

    After beating Super League champions Wigan in the World Club Challenge two weeks ago, the NSW playmaker said the defeat by Souths was a reminder of how hard the Roosters had to work to achieve the success they did last season.

    "It's different to last year," Maloney said. "That game [on Thursday night] was a wake up call that we probably needed.

    "There has been a lot of talk about stuff that was going to happen a long way away so it brings it home and makes us realise we have got a lot of work to do. We will take some lessons out of that and start working hard."

    Roosters coach Trent Robinson conceded Souths had dominated the rucks when they had the ball and in defence and said the domination of the Rabbitohs had enabled them to take better advantage of the new rules changes in force this season.

    However, Maloney said the Roosters were outplayed in almost every facet of the game.

    "I think they were just better across the board in general," he said. "I don't know whether it is the new rules, I don't think it would have mattered what rules we were playing under they were just better than us."

    The Roosters only completed 68 per cent of their sets of tackles and the errors were compounded by a 12-6 penalty count in favour of Souths - continuing last season's trend in which they were the most penalised team in the NRL.

    Those simple statistics highlight why the Roosters were sapped of energy in the second half but Maloney said the high number of penalties was just one area they needed to address.

    "There were some silly ones we need to cut out, ones that you can't accept, but at the end of the day that is how things roll," he said. "We can just do our best and make sure we minimise them as much as possible but there are a lot more issues there that we need to fix up before we worry too much about that."

    With the scores locked at 6-all early in the second half, Maloney kicked a penalty goal from close range before the Greg Inglis-inspired Rabbitohs piled on 22 unanswered points but he insisted it was still the right option.

    "At the time it was probably a tight game and it put us in front but we didn't do what we needed to do afterwards to make it the right decision," Maloney said.ends

    http://www.greatlakesadvocate.com.au...e-rules/?cs=12

  • #2
    "It's different to last year," Maloney said. "There has been a lot of talk about stuff that was going to happen a long way away so it brings it home and makes us realise we have got a lot of work to do. We will take some lessons out of that and start working hard."
    Good news.
    Yes, one game at a time, a short time away, is the way to go.
    Surprising they didn't know that, and act on it.



    The Roosters only completed 68 per cent of their sets of tackles and the errors were compounded by a 12-6 penalty count in favour of Souths - continuing last season's trend in which they were the most penalised team in the NRL.
    Nothing's changed, it's the same refereeing tripe as last year, and all the years before that.



    Those simple statistics highlight why the Roosters were sapped of energy in the second half but Maloney said the high number of penalties was just one area they needed to address.
    That's the whole idea, isn't it?



    "There were some silly ones we need to cut out, ones that you can't accept, but at the end of the day that is how things roll," he said.
    Well it's time club management started squealing like stuck pigs and taking legal action...so it's not how things roll.



    With the scores locked at 6-all early in the second half, Maloney kicked a penalty goal from close range before the Greg Inglis-inspired Rabbitohs piled on 22 unanswered points but he insisted it was still the right option.

    "At the time it was probably a tight game and it put us in front but we didn't do what we needed to do afterwards to make it the right decision," Maloney said.


    True. We should've kicked the second one too!
    We didn't, and all our momentum disappeared into the dark sky, never to be seen again that night.
    Last edited by bondi-boy; 03-08-2014, 10:08 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      yes its about time we legally challenged a number of referee decisions that may havew cost us a lot of money? eg the trip on sbw when poised to score , also why not sin bin used for blatant foul play! two instances that may have impacted big time on the final score? if the nrl have rules in place they must play by them too! very quick to cite our players after the game eg sbw for apparent shoulder charge in last tackle but they dont site two souffs players for blatant sin bin fouls!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by stephenj View Post
        yes its about time we legally challenged a number of referee decisions that may havew cost us a lot of money? eg the trip on sbw when poised to score , also why not sin bin used for blatant foul play! two instances that may have impacted big time on the final score? if the nrl have rules in place they must play by them too! very quick to cite our players after the game eg sbw for apparent shoulder charge in last tackle but they dont site two souffs players for blatant sin bin fouls!
        Exactly.

        Comment


        • #5
          I blame the coaching staff for not having the players in the right frame of mind.. Sack the lot of them!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by turk-283 View Post
            I blame the coaching staff for not having the players in the right frame of mind.. Sack the lot of them!
            Proably a bit difficult for the coaching staff to have the players at the top of the "up meter" again so soon...after having them there for the WCC [like playing another GF].
            Souths home game, 12-6 penalty count in Souths favour, we didn't really have any chance of winning that one.
            Souths are a big team...we should be so big.

            Is there a giant of a forward in Newtown we can use as a battering ram against the Eels?
            It's 'bash em, smash em, trash em' time...[legally of course]
            The refs and NRL have shown their hand in the first game of the season.

            Time for 'rough-house' tactics...show no mercy!
            Too many opposition players being allowed to get the ball away in tackles.

            Souths threw our players around like rag dolls, time we did the same.

            FPN made some strong runs against Souths...there's plenty of metres to be gained by him thru the centres.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by bondi-boy View Post
              Proably a bit difficult for the coaching staff to have the players at the top of the "up meter" again so soon...after having them there for the WCC [like playing another GF].
              Souths home game, 12-6 penalty count in Souths favour, we didn't really have any chance of winning that one.
              Souths are a big team...we should be so big.

              Is there a giant of a forward in Newtown we can use as a battering ram against the Eels?
              It's 'bash em, smash em, trash em' time...[legally of course]
              The refs and NRL have shown their hand in the first game of the season.

              Time for 'rough-house' tactics...show no mercy!
              Too many opposition players being allowed to get the ball away in tackles.

              Souths threw our players around like rag dolls, time we did the same.

              FPN made some strong runs against Souths...there's plenty of metres to be gained by him thru the centres.
              Your a cunning-linguist-in-hongkong..

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by stephenj View Post
                yes its about time we legally challenged a number of referee decisions that may havew cost us a lot of money? eg the trip on sbw when poised to score , also why not sin bin used for blatant foul play! two instances that may have impacted big time on the final score? if the nrl have rules in place they must play by them too! very quick to cite our players after the game eg sbw for apparent shoulder charge in last tackle but they dont site two souffs players for blatant sin bin fouls!
                Because apart from fighting, the Sin Bin is not supposed to be used for foul play.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I personally don't think Maloney had a good game.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mickey Lane View Post
                    I personally don't think Maloney had a good game.
                    Maloney had a shocker,

                    Our pack was light on
                    "Qui audet adipiscitur"

                    WHO DARES WINS

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Mickey Lane View Post
                      I personally don't think Maloney had a good game.
                      How cold anyone play behind Thursdays pack?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Maloney is child-size...how can he be expected to tackle Inglis, Burgess etc in full flight.
                        The big huge monsters in the Souths pack could, and just about did, pick him up in one hand, swing him around by the jersey collar and slam him into the ground.
                        Obviously Maloney was targeted.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I just keep reminding myself that 2013 started out the same way and end rather well, or as Captain Backwards puts it - dejapoo.
                          "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

                          Thomas Jefferson

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by TheLoneRooster View Post
                            I just keep reminding myself that 2013 started out the same way and end rather well, or as Captain Backwards puts it - dejapoo.
                            As I said last season my friend, if we are still playing that way in round 10 or 18 or 26 then we are farked and I will cry like the rest of the sooks on this forum.

                            Till then it's all DeJaPoo.



                            The FlogPen .

                            You know it makes sense.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X