Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lassick

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lassick

    facing 4 weeks if he takes the plea

    SBW gets 3

    what a disgrace

    Lassicks was a lot worse - based on SBW 3 weeks he should get a minimum of 6 weeks

  • #2
    so a clumsy shoulder charge is more dangerous than an intentional/reckless high tackle, good to see the NRL have got things under control.

    Comment


    • #3
      NRL setting a worrying precedent with this...
      But as we all know, the NRL are never consistent in their rulings.

      Utter bullshit..............

      Comment


      • #4
        if JWH had made that hit they would of sent him off and give him 8 weeks

        if it was in the days of Morley they would of called the cops onto the field to arrest him and lock him up

        Comment


        • #5
          Grade 4 reckless is pretty much on the mark, without an early guilty plea it's a 6 week ban.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by pelli69 View Post
            facing 4 weeks if he takes the plea

            SBW gets 3

            what a disgrace

            Lassicks was a lot worse - based on SBW 3 weeks he should get a minimum of 6 weeks
            All really depends how much loading both had, which can make one look more unfair than the other.

            Comment


            • #7
              In good news Josh Mcguire is ruled out for this week for the Broncs
              Rise Again. Represent 1908. Tick Tick Boom!

              Premiers 2013 - What a night! Bondi Junction till dawn! #BackOnTop

              Easts to Win.

              Comment


              • #8
                beware marty k

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't know if there is a more devestating ball runner than JWH, he is like a runaway truck, there's no easy way to tackle him. Go high at your own peril the results for getting it wrong are usually catastrophic, look what happened to poor old Danny Buderius.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    kane v marty...hehehehehehehehehe. go kane.

                    I could see naps having a shot as well on marty. im picturing rts stepping n weaving marty , and im hearing the beep beep beeping of martys reversing beeper while he is turning around to see where rog went


                    lussic backed up another recklees head hi on jwh and got nothing. but I did love the moa, evan square up on him.
                    1911 1912 1913 1923 1935 1936 1937 1940 1945 1974 1975 2002 2013 2018 2019 2020

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Lasics...I need to get that.
                      SUPER DRAGON!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        La Sick indeed
                        "Qui audet adipiscitur"

                        WHO DARES WINS

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well Darcy Lussick will be happy he got someone else to take the rap.
                          The Internet is a place for posting silly things
                          Try and be serious and you will look stupid
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            According to sean my pies taste like $hit garlick who is on the judiciary panel and is a well known to be a Roosters hater and $ouff$ lover, you get a huge discount if the incident was done on a Roosters player.

                            Why didn't f***wit garlick phone up fox sports to ask for footage of the lussick head high soon after it happened, like he did when SBW did that much much more minor incident in round 1??
                            The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                            Here's looking at you, kid.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post
                              According to sean my pies taste like $hit garlick who is on the judiciary panel and is a well known to be a Roosters hater and $ouff$ lover, you get a huge discount if the incident was done on a Roosters player.

                              Why didn't f***wit garlick phone up fox sports to ask for footage of the lussick head high soon after it happened, like he did when SBW did that much much more minor incident in round 1??
                              Didn't realise that Garlick was the one that phoned for the footage. Seems he is still dirty on the Roosters and someone eating his partners's pie.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X