Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

rumours match review panel to hit JWH with reckless high tackle charge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by fletch View Post
    should find out in about 2hrs what exactly JWH gets charged with, still think it will end up around 6 weeks due to loading/carry over points.
    I think you are right mate.

    I'm expecting 4-6 now.

    Comment


    • #17
      Given they sentenced SBW so quickly, why are they taking so long to find a charge with JWH?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by ism22 View Post
        Given they sentenced SBW so quickly, why are they taking so long to find a charge with JWH?
        Why ask that question here jism???



        The FlogPen .

        You know it makes sense.

        Comment


        • #19
          In the Bulldogs game Reynolds hits the Storm winger with a similar tackle at about 32 minutes in. If anything there is more intent in Reynolds tackle. Tonumaipea gets up gingerly after the hit, which at the time was called a great tackle by Warren Smith.

          Comment


          • #20
            I've been refreshing the nrl.com site for an hour now! Hurry up!!

            **** I live a sad life.

            Comment


            • #21
              Stewart head butted JWH's shoulder..

              It was a ridiculous decision to even award a penalty to Manly..

              If anything we should have got a penalty for an obvious head butt & Stewart would be on report..

              Comment


              • #22
                Sydney Roosters ‏@sydneyroosters
                Judiciary Update: JWH has been charged with a Grade 2 Careless High Tackle by the NRL Match Review Committee

                That's 1 week with early plea or 2 weeks if he contests and loses. We'll take the one week.

                Comment


                • #23
                  wow I'm shocked, get that early guilty plea in as early as possible, maybe they thought they screwed us enough on Friday night.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    One week is fair enough

                    He did a great job getting rid of Stewart but we still lost
                    "Qui audet adipiscitur"

                    WHO DARES WINS

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      The committee needs to have separation - no ex players.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        the committee should be one from each team involved and one xref/nrl rep.
                        1911 1912 1913 1923 1935 1936 1937 1940 1945 1974 1975 2002 2013 2018 2019 2020

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by bondi paul View Post
                          The committee needs to have separation - no ex players.

                          Bingo we have a winner. Unfortunately common sense and NRL are not allowed in the same sentence.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            totally disagree that he be charged at all but will take just the 1 week

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              On the money Fletch! Well done

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Never should've even been a penalty! I can't believe they didn't contest it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X