Originally posted by Billy Gunn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pearce to Manly | A question not a rumour
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Reg Clough View PostCongratulations PWN
Out of your 608 posts you've managed to include an anti Pearce rant in 603 of them. I guess your name is a give away.
Can you give us a clue why. Your posts are well beyond just a dislike of a footballer.
Was Mitchell a neighbour and ran over your kids puppy?
Did you you catch him with with a finger in an orifice belonging to your mum?
There must be a deeper reason.
Let us all know - you'll feel better.
and i take offence at that 608 anti pearce posts, it should top 650 at least.
I dont like the guy plain and simple, i dont like blokes that couldnt give a flying **** about this club.
I dont like blokes who refuse kids autographs because they are looking for their next drink
I dont like blokes who cannot realise that when your club is last and you are needed to be at your top you feel the need to get out on the town getting shattered in the process.
I dont like blokes who cannot learn by their mistakes
I do not like blokes that promise show much but offer so little
I do not like blokes that are present at EVERY club indiscretion last season, but get off scot free whilst other "lesser" profile blokes are slaughtered for it.
That just about does it
Comment
-
Originally posted by Billy Gunn View Postso salary is no basis for expectation?
Are you saying you expect the same from players on $50k as you do from those on $400k?
My expectations are based on where they are in their career. At the moment Pearce is a very young half who still has a lot of developing to do. If anyone I'll compare him to Sandow, Walsh & Wallace.
If players aren't performing to their salary then the people who should be judged on that are the ones who gave it to them... not the player. It was their misjudgment after all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostNo salary shouldn't be. Why should Pearce be subject to inflated expectations because of a possible salary that no one can confirm.
My expectations are based on where they are in their career. At the moment Pearce is a very young half who still has a lot of developing to do. If anyone I'll compare him to Sandow, Walsh & Wallace.
If players aren't performing to their salary then the people who should be judged on that are the ones who gave it to them... not the player. It was their misjudgment after all.
When does the time come that he is not young, when exactly in time does that happen? age 22, 25 or 30?
Or is it 50, 75 or 100 games ?
Many young players have never had that many games or reached those ages before being kicked to the curb. All I want is that there be the best player in each position regardless of age, salary and or experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster_6 View PostNo salary shouldn't be. Why should Pearce be subject to inflated expectations because of a possible salary that no one can confirm.
My expectations are based on where they are in their career. At the moment Pearce is a very young half who still has a lot of developing to do. If anyone I'll compare him to Sandow, Walsh & Wallace.
If players aren't performing to their salary then the people who should be judged on that are the ones who gave it to them... not the player. It was their misjudgment after all.
Pearce needs to make some significant improvements to his game next season, and he needs to start having some genuine impact on matches. And from what some on here say, he needs to pull his head in off the field too. Under Smith, he's a chance of doing all those things. I'm sure pearcesworstnightmare would love to see that too. Surely everyone on here, even if they are critical of players or management, would love to be proven wrong about said player or said management person. Everyone on here loves the Roosters.
But if Pearce can't do it, he'll be moved on and Politis will just spin the wheel again. Perhaps he'll offer massive overs for an ageing Thurston? Nick's gotta get lucky on a buy someday. Surely. He's certainly due.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Billy Gunn View PostOk I will make it simpler
When does the time come that he is not young, when exactly in time does that happen? age 22, 25 or 30?
Or is it 50, 75 or 100 games ?
Many young players have never had that many games or reached those ages before being kicked to the curb. All I want is that there be the best player in each position regardless of age, salary and or experience.
Nice to see a player getting a go before getting kicked to the curb... especially one with so much potential and one who was put into FG way too early. Ideally he should've been blooded into FG slowly last season, I'm not going to judge a player because of mistakes made by the club.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pearcesworstnightmare View PostAll i care about is the club and our performance, if Pearce can contribute to that in some positive way then great, if he wants to stay part of the problem he can fark off with anyone else that chooses to screw up.
Comment
Comment