Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Penalty Theory

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Ox Baker View Post
    You've hit the nail on the head of our whole defensive strategy under Robbo. When under pressure hold down for as long as it takes for the line to reset. If it results in a penalty so be it. Those who can't see that we do that as a very deliberate tactic are just missing the obvious.
    That's it! It also frustrates the opposition because any momentum they had is now gone and they have to start over again, whilst we reset the defense. The day they start introducing sin bins for repeat offences is the day we will suffer more from penalties.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Ox Baker View Post
      You've hit the nail on the head of our whole defensive strategy under Robbo. When under pressure hold down for as long as it takes for the line to reset. If it results in a penalty so be it. Those who can't see that we do that as a very deliberate tactic are just missing the obvious.
      I have noticed that in these situations the penalties that are given away are not for holding down in the play-the-ball but rather for offside which the opposition are not allowed to take quick tap restarts under the changed regulations.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Ox Baker View Post
        You've hit the nail on the head of our whole defensive strategy under Robbo. When under pressure hold down for as long as it takes for the line to reset. If it results in a penalty so be it. Those who can't see that we do that as a very deliberate tactic are just missing the obvious.
        Maybe if it was an early tackle on the line. But the bulk of the tackles are elsewhere.

        Do you really think they would do that when the other side is still in their half?

        And you say it's our defensive strategy under Robbo. How do you explain the previous eight years?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post
          Maybe if it was an early tackle on the line. But the bulk of the tackles are elsewhere.

          Do you really think they would do that when the other side is still in their half?

          And you say it's our defensive strategy under Robbo. How do you explain the previous eight years?
          Our 2002 premiership was won off the back using the Dominant (gang) Tackle to keep our defensive line set. I can still remember the heated debate between Stick and Opes over the interpretation of the Dominant Tackle which ultimately decided the premiership.

          Sticky and Freddy make up most of those "unexplained" years.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by kegs2 View Post
            To quote Braith Anasta: 'You're off your head'.
            Just out of curiosity, did Braith get into strife for "offending" Ben Cummins?
            SUPER DRAGON!

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Ox Baker View Post
              You've hit the nail on the head of our whole defensive strategy under Robbo. When under pressure hold down for as long as it takes for the line to reset. If it results in a penalty so be it. Those who can't see that we do that as a very deliberate tactic are just missing the obvious.
              Still doesn't explain why we don't get penalties though....where's the obvious answer to that question?

              Comment


              • #67
                Bingo.

                10 points to Kingsgrove-Loiner.

                So say it just so happens that we do indeed like giving away penalties for the fun of it.

                Now explain why we receive the fewest. Why we received the fewest between 2008-2013 and, oh look, are currently receiving the fewest in 2014.

                Is that a genius Robbo tactic as well?

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post
                  Trust me when I say that I feel your frustrations!! According to certain people on here, the bias by the refs against us is ok/acceptable for a few reasons such as cause of the tip sheet theory which they have been using the same tip sheet for 10 years. Only problem being we only have one player still with us through that time and have had 5 different coaches. Another reason why it is seen as justifiable by them, is that the refs don't like us because our team is from the Eastern suburbs, a rich area, and this is ok for the refs to think like that.

                  And of course this obvious bias against us by the refs is in no way at all seen as corrupt in any way.
                  Bullshit.

                  I've heard no Easts fan say its in any way okay or acceptable or justifiable.

                  It is simply an explanation/opinion as to why the numbers stack against us in the way they do.

                  I see no point in whinging about it.

                  Period.

                  I'd rather be viewed as following an illdisciplined team than a team of whingers.

                  Same as with the 'lay down Sally' stuff. Same with the 'repeat set' theory.

                  I'm proud the clubs taken the stance to fight fire with fire rather than whinge about shit we can't control and from last seasons results (and the 6GFs in 14 years indicates) it is just another roadblock we obviously are able to overcome.

                  You have put words into people's mouths and you ass-u-me incorrectly.

                  You are wrong in this instance mate.



                  The FlogPen .

                  You know it makes sense.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by stsae View Post
                    Bullshit.

                    I've heard no Easts fan say its in any way okay or acceptable or justifiable.

                    It is simply an explanation/opinion as to why the numbers stack against us in the way they do.

                    I see no point in whinging about it.

                    Period.

                    I'd rather be viewed as following an illdisciplined team than a team of whingers.

                    Same as with the 'lay down Sally' stuff. Same with the 'repeat set' theory.

                    I'm proud the clubs taken the stance to fight fire with fire rather than whinge about shit we can't control and from last seasons results (and the 6GFs in 14 years indicates) it is just another roadblock we obviously are able to overcome.

                    You have put words into people's mouths and you ass-u-me incorrectly.

                    You are wrong in this instance mate.

                    Yes it is your explanation/opinion as to why the numbers stack against us in the way they do. And guess what maaaate...... it is a total 'bullshit' explanation/opinion!! Basically you don't have the 'balls' to say that there has to be something else more to it for the refs to be continually f***ing us over for the past decade!! I don't profess to know what exactly is going on, but it is so f***ing obvious with everything that has continually gone on for years now, and yes I will come out and call foul and not hide behind some pussy explanation/opinion!!

                    As Kingsgrove-Loiner said, "Still doesn't explain why we don't get penalties though....where's the obvious answer to that question?" Try and explain that one champ??

                    I don't agree with Johnny Tobin in that conversation he had with you about Mini, but I certainly agree with him that you are so f***ing boring with your constant repetitive crap about Newman, megabosdenreserves blah blah shit and Maubs. Change the broken record FFS champ, I have been skimming past your posts for many months now cause of the same old shit waste of time they are!!

                    Btw, it was so predictable for me that I didn't require being an Oracle, that you would come out like you did there, after I had a go back at your chum!! F***ing love it that you are so predictable and fell for it!!
                    The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                    Here's looking at you, kid.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Well the Ref attitude probably happened because we sacked the refs boss son ... simple as that. It was your beloved leaders fear by sacking him we would suffer and we did immediately .Thats all that caused the rot.
                      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post
                        Yes it is your explanation/opinion as to why the numbers stack against us in the way they do. And guess what maaaate...... it is a total 'bullshit' explanation/opinion!! Basically you don't have the 'balls' to say that there has to be something else more to it for the refs to be continually f***ing us over for the past decade!! I don't profess to know what exactly is going on, but it is so f***ing obvious with everything that has continually gone on for years now, and yes I will come out and call foul and not hide behind some pussy explanation/opinion!!

                        As Kingsgrove-Loiner said, "Still doesn't explain why we don't get penalties though....where's the obvious answer to that question?" Try and explain that one champ??

                        I don't agree with Johnny Tobin in that conversation he had with you about Mini, but I certainly agree with him that you are so f***ing boring with your constant repetitive crap about Newman, megabosdenreserves blah blah shit and Maubs. Change the broken record FFS champ, I have been skimming past your posts for many months now cause of the same old shit waste of time they are!!

                        Btw, it was so predictable for me that I didn't require being an Oracle, that you would come out like you did there, after I had a go back at your chum!! F***ing love it that you are so predictable and fell for it!!
                        Change the broken record? CHANGE THE BROKEN RECORD?

                        Youve been sprouting he same shit for more than 12 months now, and you come up with that pearler?

                        **** me you are one ****ed c*nt.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post
                          Yes it is your explanation/opinion as to why the numbers stack against us in the way they do. And guess what maaaate...... it is a total 'bullshit' explanation/opinion!! Basically you don't have the 'balls' to say that there has to be something else more to it for the refs to be continually f***ing us over for the past decade!! I don't profess to know what exactly is going on, but it is so f***ing obvious with everything that has continually gone on for years now, and yes I will come out and call foul and not hide behind some pussy explanation/opinion!!

                          As Kingsgrove-Loiner said, "Still doesn't explain why we don't get penalties though....where's the obvious answer to that question?" Try and explain that one champ??

                          I don't agree with Johnny Tobin in that conversation he had with you about Mini, but I certainly agree with him that you are so f***ing boring with your constant repetitive crap about Newman, megabosdenreserves blah blah shit and Maubs. Change the broken record FFS champ, I have been skimming past your posts for many months now cause of the same old shit waste of time they are!!

                          Btw, it was so predictable for me that I didn't require being an Oracle, that you would come out like you did there, after I had a go back at your chum!! F***ing love it that you are so predictable and fell for it!!
                          bOraclesworstnightmare.

                          Lets look at it.

                          Maubs was re-signed plays well every week, despite making no-ones pre-season threads 2 years running.

                          SuperMegaBosden was cut.

                          Mini who we won a comp with as FB and captain despite Newmans predictions.

                          And we won the comp despite your constant whinging about reffing bias and predictions about Souffs bias, which you said we'd never do.

                          And I'm being a repetitive pussy???

                          Wow.

                          You're on fire bOracle.

                          Tell us more.

                          Last edited by stsae; 05-27-2014, 01:10 PM.


                          The FlogPen .

                          You know it makes sense.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            The explanation is that refs go into our games with pre-conceived ideas that lead to lots of penalties against is.

                            They should referee the game in front of them without bias.

                            Get used to it though. It will take years to turn that bias around.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by kegs2 View Post
                              I find those stats ourtageous, but let's try it from a different angle.

                              the two worst teams are us and manly. since 2008, manly have made 3 grand finals for 2 wins, and we have made 2 grand finals for one win. on the other hand, the two best teams are cronulla and souths, who have not only not made a grand final in this time period, but theyve havent won a grand final since colour tv!
                              Interesting angle, but in that time Saints have also won and Melba as well.

                              Saints are near the top and Melba in the middle in terms of favourable penalties. So from this angle you can say penalties do matter. Also, if Easts and Manly had a fairer share of penalties, maybe we'd have won more GF's - 2010 comes to mind - if the refs were on the ball, (and Carney didn't choke and kicked that very easy conversion). the halftime would have been 10-0. Who knows what the outcome might have been from there?

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by stsae View Post
                                bOraclesworstnightmare.

                                Lets look at it.

                                Maubs was re-signed plays well every week, despite making no-ones pre-season threads 2 years running.

                                SuperMegaBosden was cut.

                                Mini who we won a comp with as FB and captain despite Newmans predictions.

                                And we won the comp despite your constant whinging about reffing bias and predictions about Souffs bias, which you said we'd never do.

                                And I'm being a repetitive pussy???

                                Wow.

                                You're on fire bOracle.

                                Tell us more.

                                Yes yes we get it tnucyssupevititepergnirob, you have told us all over a hundred thousand times about Maubs, something supermegacrap and Mini ffs!!
                                Please tnucyssupevititepergnirob for the love of God, don't tell us any more!!
                                The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

                                Here's looking at you, kid.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X