Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cordner to have a blinder against Manly.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by elo View Post
    Cummins was up to the same tricks down in Melbourne yesterday.

    The guy can't be this incompetent, surely not - Sandow is on to him.
    Refs want action over Sandow
    NRL referees are keeping a closer than normal watch on the judiciary charge sheet to see if Chris Sandow is hit for questioning the integrity of referee Ben Cummins during the Eels' 46-20 loss to Melbourne. The cheeky Parra No.7 was sin-binned for asking Cummins 'how much are they paying you?' after a penalty went against his team. Parramatta coach Brad Arthur tried to dismiss the incident as 'trivial' but the whistle-blowing fraternity has taken a much dimmer view and expect some sort of action.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Johnny Tobin View Post
      Just one penalty for Lyon running Toups off the ball would be enough for me. Just one. Please.
      Wishful thinking JT! Lyon, along with the rest of womanly, will be allowed to get away with murder against us at $hitvillebrookie!!
      The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

      Here's looking at you, kid.

      Comment


      • #18
        Penalty counts won, Away games: 2008-2013

        Sharks ------- 36
        Broncos -------31
        Rabbitohs ---- 28
        Dragons -------27
        Raiders --------23
        Titans ---------23
        Tigers ---------22
        Eels ------------21
        Storm ---------20
        Cowboys ------20
        Sea Eagles ----19
        Knights --------17
        Warriors -------16
        Bulldogs -------15
        Panthers -------15

        ...
        ...
        ...

        Roosters --------8

        So yeah, don't get your hopes up of a positive penalty count at Brooky!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by fletch View Post
          Refs want action over Sandow
          NRL referees are keeping a closer than normal watch on the judiciary charge sheet to see if Chris Sandow is hit for questioning the integrity of referee Ben Cummins during the Eels' 46-20 loss to Melbourne. The cheeky Parra No.7 was sin-binned for asking Cummins 'how much are they paying you?' after a penalty went against his team. Parramatta coach Brad Arthur tried to dismiss the incident as 'trivial' but the whistle-blowing fraternity has taken a much dimmer view and expect some sort of action.
          http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226963919558


          So Sandow has been deemed to have no case to answer - he must be another Dodo Bird on the NRL Protected Species list. This creates a strong precident and opens up the case for Mini to step up the strength of his comments if we are being rolled by the Refs on Friday.

          Refs must be spewing that Sandow gets off.
          Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Tommy Smith View Post
            Penalty counts won, Away games: 2008-2013

            Sharks ------- 36
            Broncos -------31
            Rabbitohs ---- 28
            Dragons -------27
            Raiders --------23
            Titans ---------23
            Tigers ---------22
            Eels ------------21
            Storm ---------20
            Cowboys ------20
            Sea Eagles ----19
            Knights --------17
            Warriors -------16
            Bulldogs -------15
            Panthers -------15

            ...
            ...
            ...

            Roosters --------8

            So yeah, don't get your hopes up of a positive penalty count at Brooky!
            As sure as you can bet on the sun rising tomorrow, you can bet that we will not be winning the penalty count on Friday night!! Those stats that you have shown are very damning evidence that the refs just love to ream us right up the keister! Only a total DC can't see the bleeding obvious of what goes on!!
            The year 2013 marks the beginning of the Roosters next 'decade of excellence', and it will prove to be more successful than the last!

            Here's looking at you, kid.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by The Rooster Oracle View Post
              As sure as you can bet on the sun rising tomorrow, you can bet that we will not be winning the penalty count on Friday night!! Those stats that you have shown are very damning evidence that the refs just love to ream us right up the keister! Only a total DC can't see the bleeding obvious of what goes on!!
              You can point out your 'damning evidence' until the cows come home mate but until the referees, the NRL, the whole damn organisation gets done for corruption (which doesn't look like happening any time soon), you will be forever be the lunatic that cried 'conspiracy'. And I'm glad that's you, not me.

              Oh look, Chrissy Sandow asked Ben Cummins how much he was getting paid. How can that be? I thought only the Roosters were hard done by? I thought it was just Souths and the Bulldogs that got all the favours? Explain NOW Moronacle.

              Comment


              • #22
                Dregs trying to twist and turn the subject to deflect from Tommys damming stats
                When you trust your television
                what you get is what you got
                Cause when they own the information
                they can bend it all they want

                John Mayer

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                  Dregs trying to twist and turn the subject to deflect from Tommys damming stats
                  Do Tommy's stats say the NRL is corrupt? No.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    And try this for a stat:

                    The team that won the Premiership last year: Sydney Roosters.

                    Even after certain individuals on this site were convinced to the point of burst blood vessels that the NRL was doing everything in it's power to prevent us from winning, we still won.

                    How the f*ck does that work, if the NRL is corrupt?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by kegs2 View Post
                      Do Tommy's stats say the NRL is corrupt? No.
                      But they imply it!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by kegs2 View Post

                        How the f*ck does that work, if the NRL is corrupt?
                        They are incompetent - tried their hardest but failed.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by BallyChook View Post
                          They are incompetent - tried their hardest but failed.
                          If you truly think that, you are stupid. There is no other way i can put it.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Kegs. I get the fact that you do not think it is a conspiracy. I respect the right you have to voice it.


                            But surely by now, you do not need to insult the people that do believe this to be the case. It's getting pretty tiresome. How about a little respect for fellow posters.
                            Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by The Axe View Post
                              Kegs. I get the fact that you do not think it is a conspiracy. I respect the right you have to voice it.


                              But surely by now, you do not need to insult the people that do believe this to be the case. It's getting pretty tiresome. How about a little respect for fellow posters.
                              Does this rule not apply to Moronacle?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by kegs2 View Post
                                Does this rule not apply to Moronacle?
                                Yes mate. And me as well
                                Just time we all respected our points of difference, I feel.
                                Written and published on behalf of the Liberal Party, Queensland

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X