Guerra

[Guest]

Guerra took an early plea last year for a 100 point offence. If my understanding is correct it means he has 75 carry over points plus 20% loading.

Grade 1 - 195 points - 170 with early plea
Grade 2 - 375 points - 312 with early plea


Roosters would contest a Grade 2 for sure.

[stsae]

Guerra took an early plea last year for a 100 point offence. If my understanding is correct it means he has 75 carry over points plus 20% loading.

Grade 1 - 195 points - 170 with early plea
Grade 2 - 375 points - 312 with early plea


Roosters would contest a Grade 2 for sure.

Didn't Teo cop heaps of loading from being charged 5 times this season???

IMO Che didn't attack the arm anywhere near as badly as Teo. I still question if he uses his hands, I reckon his body rolled his arm that way.

[fletch]

Guerra took an early plea last year for a 100 point offence. If my understanding is correct it means he has 75 carry over points plus 20% loading.

Grade 1 - 195 points - 170 with early plea
Grade 2 - 375 points - 312 with early plea


Roosters would contest a Grade 2 for sure.

I'm not sure if its the NRL or AFL but one code reduces the carry over points by 5pts for each week without suspension and the other code just wipes out the carry over points after 12 months, in both occasions he would be without carry over points, however the loading causes another problem all together, it means 2 weeks is going to be the best case scenario, but 3 weeks will be more likely.

[Tommy Smith]

If Matai can get off for a blatant shoulder charge then anything can happen.

However, I'm pretty sure though it'll be a grade two charge. And given how he continued to place pressure on the arm I don't think he'll get off.

[stsae]

I'm not sure if its the NRL or AFL but one code reduces the carry over points by 5pts for each week without suspension and the other code just wipes out the carry over points after 12 months, in both occasions he would be without carry over points, however the loading causes another problem all together, it means 2 weeks is going to be the best case scenario, but 3 weeks will be more likely.

Seriously that's out there mate.

In comparison to Teo he's a cleanskin and that tackle was nowhere near as bad as Teos.

What did Teo cop??? 4 weeks???

I'm sure he'd have only got one without the loading.

[fletch]

unfortunately our season could now rest in the hands of the MRP, if they really wanted to kill us off they could take out Guerra/Napa and JWH.

even the smallest grade 1 careless high tackle charge would sit JWH for two weeks, we all think there was nothing in it, but if they want to be picky he did make contact with the head.

with Napa/Guerra its just a matter of how hard the MRP swings the sledge hammer.

[kurtsherlock6]

unfortunately our season could now rest in the hands of the MRP, if they really wanted to kill us off they could take out Guerra/Napa and JWH.

even the smallest grade 1 careless high tackle charge would sit JWH for two weeks, we all think there was nothing in it, but if they want to be picky he did make contact with the head.

with Napa/Guerra its just a matter of how hard the MRP swings the sledge hammer.

Geez mate you got real negative mind set tonight. I'm glad you're not on the MRP, you'd have half our team suspended after tonight. Oh & you do realize we actually won?

[shagger]

burgess head slam on jwh last tackle of the match. They have to look at that.

[Rooster_6]

I don't think Guerra has too much to worry about, it was more a twist of the torso than the arm. Still need to get it out of the game but anything more than a grade 1 would be excessive IMO.

Would need to see the Napa one again before commenting.

[Rooster_6]

Just seen it again, if Napa misses a game for that the game has dead set lost it. The way people have been carrying on I thought he must've collected him high. No chance he'll miss a game for that.

[Guest]

Just seen it again, if Napa misses a game for that the game has dead set lost it. The way people have been carrying on I thought he must've collected him high. No chance he'll miss a game for that.

I didn't think a he's was that bad either but I still think they slap him with a charge and 1 week ban.
I think there is a screw or two loose in young Napa though. Every game he try's to put on a shoulder charge. As soon as he gets it out of his game and focuses on just making the tackle the better. Barring those 2 shoulder charges I actually think he was better the JWH that first 20 min. His defence was awesome in the middle and he set the tone off the kick off when he launched straight into Burgeass

[roosterproud]

guerrs gfabbed the souffs left arm and yet immediately after the tackle he held his right and when he went up the tunnel he was holding his right shoulder. 1 week for guerrs and one for napstar. hope he only get charged for one of his shoulder charges....enter kane

[Guest]

Fark all in either tackle imo.

If they get charged, challenge the grading and claim their kids needed feeding and they were fearful for their lives.

Chook.

[Guest]

I'm not sure if its the NRL or AFL but one code reduces the carry over points by 5pts for each week without suspension and the other code just wipes out the carry over points after 12 months, in both occasions he would be without carry over points, however the loading causes another problem all together, it means 2 weeks is going to be the best case scenario, but 3 weeks will be more likely.

Yeah. Just reading that carry-over points last twelve months. The loadings last two years. So it becomes:

Grade 1 - 120 points - 95 with early plea
Grade 2 - 300 points - 225 with early plea

[Thirteen]

Fark all in either tackle imo.

If they get charged, challenge the grading and claim their kids needed feeding and they were fearful for their lives.

Chook.

My thoughts exactly!