Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MERGED: Mason to Cowboys Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MERGED: Mason to Cowboys Discussion

    http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,...018866,00.html

    North Queensland Cowboys officially make Willie Mason an offer

    February 03, 2010 North Queensland Cowboys have made an offer to former Test forward Willie Mason on the same day Newcastle Knights officially expressed an interest in the 29-year-old.

    The Cowboys said after unanimous support of the players and coaching staff, the board decided to make Mason an offer, but they refused to release any further details.

    Earlier on Wednesday, the Knights confirmed their interest in Mason by recommending him to the club board.

    Newcastle's football committee held a meeting on Wednesday morning over whether to pursue the former representative player, and Knights chief executive Steve Burraston said the response was strongly in favour.

    "The overall majority felt it was the right decision and believed we can provide the best environment for Willie to return home, rebuild his career and shake off the negative perceptions," Burraston said in a statement.

    Cowboys coach Neil Henry, who met with Mason over dinner on Tuesday, said Mason would be a welcome addition to the Townsville club.

    "It was a fairly positive conversation, I know Newcastle have weighed in fairly heavily for him too and he is from that area and he's got family up there so he'll have to make a decision but it is looking positive for us."

    Henry also ruled out any chance of a bidding war between the Cowboys and Newcastle, saying the club wasn't in the financial position to do so.

    Burraston said several opinions had been sourced before deciding to ask the board to open negotiations with Mason.

    "We considered all feedback from club stakeholders ... we also contacted our 10 major sponsors and received their feedback.

    "While there were a couple who were 50-50, the overall majority felt it was the right decision.

    "The emails sent to us were slightly in favour of Willie Mason coming here so we decided to run a poll on our website to give our members and supporters a say.

    "The poll results were overwhelming with 83 per cent in support of having Willie Mason at the club in 2010."

    Burraston stressed the board must give approval before any negotiations can actually get underway between the club and Mason's management.

    And he said any agreement will be subject to strict guidelines for the Hunter Valley product.

    "Any contract that we draw up will have strict behavioural clauses included and we will have the availability to terminate if the need did arise,'' he said.

    "Having said that we are extremely buoyed by the feedback we have received from club stakeholders during the last week."

    AAP

  • #2
    We might offload him for more than we originally thought!

    Comment


    • #3
      the less we pay the better.

      Delecto Oriens est odio Meridianus
      To love Easts is to hate Souffs

      Originally posted by Bill Shankley, Liverpool FC
      At a football club, there’s a holy trinity – the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don’t come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques.
      Originally posted by Andy Raymond Commentating Souffs V Manly 18/04/09
      The fireworks at the Easter show are making more noise than the crowd tonight

      Comment


      • #4
        We shouldnt be paying a cent for him to play elsewhere. He should take what he can get or get paid his $400K to play for Newtown.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Dolphin View Post
          We shouldnt be paying a cent for him to play elsewhere. He should take what he can get or get paid his $400K to play for Newtown.
          We don't really want him near our players. North Qld or Newcastle will suit us fine.
          Born and bred in the eastern suburbs.

          Comment


          • #6
            Let's just hope it's finalised very very soon

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Billy Gunn View Post
              Let's just hope it's finalised very very soon
              My mail is he will sign with Newcastle as soon as tomorrow BG.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by spanner View Post
                My mail is he will sign with Newcastle as soon as tomorrow BG.
                I hope you're right with your mail spanner and at the same time I agree with Dolphin in that the Roosters "shouldnt be paying a cent for him to play elsewhere." Can't wait for this to be over and this cancer is finally cut from the mighty Roosters, never to return.
                "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

                Thomas Jefferson

                Comment


                • #9
                  He can sign with either of them but he and his manager still need to get a release from his Easts contract.

                  That would be a conversation worth listening to.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Wherever he goes, I hope we aren't paying him a cent.


                    I rather let him rot on the sidelines for 12 months than pay him a couple hundred to play against us and prop up someone else's team. Rest assured he will destroy us in the 1-2 games he plays us this year, much like he did against the bulldogs when joining us.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It seems a pretty confusing process.

                      On the one hand he asks for a release, gets it, and whoever signs him is responsible for all his payments. He ends up getting nothing like $400K a season

                      On the other hand, he asks for a release, gets it, and the Roosters reach an agreement with the other club to pay part of his 2010 salary. This way he might end up getting something appraoching $400K, as per Finch, Stuart, and God knows who else

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Danish View Post
                        Wherever he goes, I hope we aren't paying him a cent.


                        I rather let him rot on the sidelines for 12 months than pay him a couple hundred to play against us and prop up someone else's team. Rest assured he will destroy us in the 1-2 games he plays us this year, much like he did against the bulldogs when joining us.
                        Rubbish All you have to do to stop the pea heart is hit him hard early and he goes missing.I cant wait till we play him so our guys can belt the shite out of him whenever he touches the ball
                        When you trust your television
                        what you get is what you got
                        Cause when they own the information
                        they can bend it all they want

                        John Mayer

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Andrew Walker View Post
                          Rubbish All you have to do to stop the pea heart is hit him hard early and he goes missing.I cant wait till we play him so our guys can belt the shite out of him whenever he touches the ball
                          Correct weight.. it's a shame JWH isn't going to there to give out some pain...
                          ...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Tries Off Kicks View Post
                            It seems a pretty confusing process.

                            On the one hand he asks for a release, gets it, and whoever signs him is responsible for all his payments. He ends up getting nothing like $400K a season

                            On the other hand, he asks for a release, gets it, and the Roosters reach an agreement with the other club to pay part of his 2010 salary. This way he might end up getting something appraoching $400K, as per Finch, Stuart, and God knows who else
                            We have already paid part of his 2010 salary whilst he's been sitting on the sidelines. I don't think the Roosters will be looking to pay too much more. They will give the Wanka the choice of moving on and taking what he's already received and nothing more and his new Club can pay whatever they choose, or sitting on the sidelines and getting his $400K.

                            If he wants to be greedy, he will end up playing for Newtown/Bundy Cup.


                            NC
                            Supporting the RW&B, through good times and bad times.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by novice chook View Post
                              We have already paid part of his 2010 salary whilst he's been sitting on the sidelines. I don't think the Roosters will be looking to pay too much more. They will give the Wanka the choice of moving on and taking what he's already received and nothing more and his new Club can pay whatever they choose, or sitting on the sidelines and getting his $400K.

                              If he wants to be greedy, he will end up playing for Newtown/Bundy Cup.


                              NC
                              And if the Roosters want to be greedy, they'll end up paying more than 10% of their entire 2010 salary cap for a guy who won't be on the field at any stage for them during the season.

                              There'll need to be give and take on both sides

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X